Smith v. Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center, No. 7:2014cv00705 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 01/05/2015. (kab)

Download PDF

rapnœs oG l ,s. Dl cEu sm . AT RoM oKE, A V FIED L I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI R O A NO K E DI SI N W O D EV O N TA E SM I , TH J q7,25 AN 2 1 JULI C. A BK ,G .** K . Z : . CA SE N O .7: 14CV 00705 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O M N DU M O PI O N NI N O R TH W ESTERN R EG I NA L A DU LT O D ETENTI N C EN TER , O By: H on.G l n E .Conra e d Chi fU ni e St esD i t i Judge e t d at srd Dee f ndant . De ae Sm ih,a Vig ni i t pr e ng pr x ,fld t s cvi rght a ton unde vont t r i a nma e oc edi o ie hi i l i s c i r 4 U. C. 1 8 , g is teNo twe tr Re i n l utDee to Ce tr S t alg st t 2 S. j 9 3 a an t h rh sen go a Ad l tn in n e . mih le e ha whl o t r we emo ighi t a ohe l t h wa atc da ij r db a oh ri mae i fkes r vn m o n t r l , e s ta ke nd n u e y n te n t . e ni Upo r vi oft r co d,t c tc l s t tt c n e ew he e r he our oncude ha he ompli f is t sae a a tona e ant a l o t t ny c i bl c am and,t r or ,sl li he ef e lmmarl dim is t c e. iy s s es he as The c t i r quie t dimis a a ton or cli fld by a prs r agans a our s e r d o s s ny c i am ie ione i t gove n t e iy orofke i t c tde e mi st aci n orcai i fi ous m ai i , r men al ntt t r f he our t r ne he to l m s rvol , lcous o fis t sae a cam o whih rle ma be g a t d 2 U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) Th r al o tt li n c eif y rn e . 8 S. 91 A( )1. e panifsû a t a alg to smu tbe e ug t rie arg tt rle a o e te s c ltve litf û cu l le ain s m no h o as i h o eif b v h pe u ai lve,'t onet ti t a i e on isf c 'r t rt n m e e y ç nc i bl .' Be lAt.Cor .v. e l' o ha s t usbl pl t a e, a he ha ' r l i eva e' l l co p Twombl 550 U. 5 570 ( y, S. 44, 2007) To sae ac e ofa ton under51 apl ntf mus . tt aus ci 983, ai if t e tbls t the ha be n de i ofrght g r nt e by t Consiuton orl wsoft Unie sa ih ha s e prved i s ua a e d he tt i a he t d Smith v. Northwestern Regional Adult Detention Center Doc. 7 St t sa t tt sde i ton r s t d fom co a e nd ha hi prva i e ule r nduc c mitd by ape s aci t d rcol t om te r on tng m e or ofsaelw.W etv.At ns 487U. 42( 988) tt a s ki , S. 1 . The onl e iy t t Smih na y ntt ha t mes a a de e s f ndan i t de e i c nt r is l. The t s he t nton e e t ef d tnin c ne , o ve,i no at e s n's be tt s i u e j 1 8 . P e lv. n 2 3 ee to e tr h we r s t ç ro ' u j c o ut nd r 9 3 rva Re o, 0 p Dockets.Justia.com = q F. 821 2000 W L 20591 a *1( h Ci.J 1 2000)( i W ilv.M ihi n De tof 3d , , t 4t r an. 3, quotng l c ga p' S aeP lc , 1U. 58 71( 9 9 ) Mc vv. e a e k Co rcin lCe tr 7 8 F. p . tt o ie 49 S. , 1 8 ); co Ch sp a e re t a n e, 8 Su p o 8 0 8 3 9 ( D. .1 9 )(i dn ct j i i n fo s i a dno apes nf rp r o e o 9 , 9 - 4 E. Va 9 2 fn ig i al mmu e r m ut n t ro o u p s s f y j1 8 ) Theeo e t e c t'wils mmai ds s ti a to wi o tp eu ie p rua tt 9 3 . rf r , h out l u rl imis h s cin t u rj dc , u s n o y h j 1 5 b ( ) a lg lyfio o s'Ana p o raeod rwi is et i d y. 91 A( )1 , s e al rv l u . p r p it r e l su h s a l The Clr i die t t s nd co e oft s m e or ndlm opi o a a compa ng e k s r ced o e pis hi m a l ni n nd c nyi or rt pli tf . de o a n if ENTER :Thi S N da ofJ r , 2015. s y anuay Chi Unie St t sDititJ ef t d a e src udge * I a eve , Smih' s realegai dono i caet tt ofie whomovedhi fom onel ton n ny nt t s pa s l tons t ndi t ha he fc r m r ocai t a oh rwi i ted tninc ne ha o jciee ie c ta temo eplcd S t a a yrs o sro sh r o n te t n h ee to e tr d b etv vd n e h th v a e mi t n ik f eiu am h h fo a oh rimae Se Pars e rl Le v Clv ln 3 2 F.d 2 4 3 2 (t Ci.2 0 )(odn ta rm n te n t. e rih x e. e . e ea d, 7 3 9 , 0 4h r 0 4 h lig h t gove nm e ofi alvi aes c tt tonalrght ofpr tilde ane onl whe he know s of but dir r a r nt tci olt onsiui i s era t i e y n segads sg iia trs o sro sham t ted oie )(in Fame v Brn a ,51 U..8 ,8 7(9 4:; hte v infc n ik f eiu r o h e n e ct g r r . e n n 1 S 25 3 1 9 W i v . i l Ales 4 5U.. 2 31 ( 9 6 (odn ta d l rt i i rn er q rss wi ofû r ta o dn r lc b r, 7 S 31 , 9 1 8 ) h lig h t ei ae ndfee c e uie ho ng E e h n r iay ak be mo o d ecr frtepio e' itrsso s ft ) f u ae o h rs n rs neet r aef'. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.