Smith v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, No. 7:2014cv00686 - Document 27 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 3/4/2016. (slt)

Download PDF

CLERKS OFFI U. .DI O URI GE S SX AT ROANOG , VA FI LED I TH E UM TED STATES DI N STRI COURT CT #OR THE W ES TERN DI TRI OF W RGI A S CT NI RO AN O K E D I SION W LARRY W AW SM I TH, MA2 2i 2 1 26 J A ULI U BY: D P , ERK L K E CASE NO.7: 14CV00686 Pe ii ne , tto r M EM ORANDUM OPI ON M V. Dl cl' t U RGI A DEPU TM ENT u ol NI oFcouu l oxs Eè q , éy:GlnE. nr d e Co a C hi fU ni e St esD i t i tJudge e t d at src R espondent . La r W a Sm ih,aV igi a i aepr e ng pr K ,ha fl d a pe ii f a wrtof ry yne t r ni nm t oce di o s ie tton or i . ha e sc mu ,pls a tt 28U. C.j2 4. Afe aj r tili Le Comt Cicl Co r, ba o s t un o r S. 25 tr u y ra n e t y rtt u t i Sm ih wa co c e ofs c deg eem tr r ma ii wo mdi a t c mt ofus o a t s nvit d e ond r lde , lc ous t ng, nd wo ot s e f fr n i t c ie nn n he omm ison o a f l s i f e ony. Sm ih i s r i a s n e e of 53 ye r f t s t s e vng e t nc a s or he e c c i . Re ponde hasfld am o i n t dim is a Sm ih hasr s nde onvitons s nt ie to o s s , nd t e po d. The ma tr i pr e l be or t c ton t r po t a r omm e ton of U. te s es nty f e he our he e r nd ec ndai S. M a sr t J gitae udge J lC.Ho ,t whom t co tr f re tzs ca e ptruantt 28 U . C. oe ppe o he ur e e r d li s , ls o S. j6 @)1( . Th rpo tc n l e t a S t i n te t ldt rle t e j2 5 ,b c us 36 ( )B) e e r o cud s h t mi s o ni e o eif md r 2 4 e a e h t s ofhi cams ae pr e ly bar fo fde a ha asrviw a t sae c s ome s li r oc dmal red rm e r l be e e nd he tt oG ' a j d c to o l soh rcamswa n tG o ta yt'o G nt e s n b ea plc to o ,ce dy du iai n f l t e li i s o t nrr o' r G mr a o a l p iain f la c a e t bls d Fe r ll w' orç s d on a l e s bl detr i ton oft f t i lg oft sa ihe de a a ' t e ba n mr a ona e e m na i he acs n i ht he e ie c p e e tdi t Saec u t r c e ig' 28U. C. 2 5 ( Smihha fld t l vd n e r s ne n he tt o r p o e dn . ' S. j 2 4 *. t s ie i y me Smith v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Doc. 27 o j cin t p rin o t erp r; e p n e t a n to j ce t t erpo t b e to s o o t s f h e o trs o d n h s o b e td o h e r. o Afe X novo rviw oft c le d po tonsoft rpor and pe tne pa t o t tr e e he halnge ri he e t ri nt rs f he r c r ,t e c u tc n l e t tS t so j cinsaewih u mei o meey rpe tmatr e o d h o r o cud s ha mih' b e to r t o t rt r rl e a te s r ie i hi pro pladi t ta eade t l a e s d i t r por. The c ta s co l as d n s i r e ngs ha r qua ey ddr s e n he e t our lo ncudes Dockets.Justia.com t tt r por r ol sSm ih' ca msi a mn rconsse wih t r c d a a i bl lw. ha he e t es ve t s li n nne it nt t he e or nd pplca e a Th rfr ,f ig i a p o rae t d s ,te c u t l o e le S t so j cin a d a o t e eo e mdn t p r p it o o o h o r wil v m l mi be to s n d p h' t ma itaej d e sr p r a d rc mme d to i i e trt a teme rnd o nin o he g srt u g ' e o t n e o n ain n t niey s h mo a um pi o f s t c t An a oprae o derwili s t sda he our. ppr it r l s ue hi y. The Cl r i die t d t s nd c es oft s me o a lm opilo a a ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi hi m r nd l ri n nd cc nyi or rt peii r de o ttone . ENTER: Thi s V - dyo Mac , 2016. a f rh Chi fUnie Stt Diti tJ e td aes src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.