Harber v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail- Duffield, No. 7:2014cv00675 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/11/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
Harber v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail- Duffield Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION BILLY HARBER, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL DUFFIELD, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:14cv00675 MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge Plaintiff Billy Harber, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming only the “Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Duffield” as a defendant. To state a cause of action under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts indicating that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988). As a jail is not a “person” subject to suit under § 1983, Harber cannot maintain his action against the defendant jail. See McCoy v. Chesapeake Correctional Center, 788 F. Supp. 890 (E.D. Va. 1992). Therefore, I will dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). ENTER: This 11th day of December, 2014. Dockets.Justia

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.