Thornburg v. Bristol, VA City Jail, No. 7:2014cv00605 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/25/2014. (kab)

Download PDF

e m r:OFFS S. a CEU. aBr. ATROANA , VA FlED l - I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I T C O U RT C FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A R O A NO K E DI I O N V SI LARRY M I CHAEL TH ORNBURG , N2# '29 21 J A G. ULI . ERK CL BY; ' D CL ERK CASE NO .7: 4CV00605 1 Pl nt f , ai i f W. M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI BRI STOL VA CI JAI TY L, By: G l n E.C onr e ad Chi Uni St es D i ri Judge ef ted at st ct D e e nt f nda . La y M i ha Tho bur a Vig ni i t pr e di pr K ,fl t s cvi rght n. c el m g, r i a nma e oc e ng o ied hi i l i s a ton plrua t 42 U. C.j 1 ci zs nt o S. 983. Tho mbur alge t the si d i wae fom a laky g le s ha lppe n tr r e tie a te Brso Ci J i (teji' ,fl,a d b o e h sha d He a s rsta b c u ej i o lt t h it l t al dh al) el n r k i n . y : ' se t h t e a s al o t il ha k wn f rmo t t a t t i tha be nla n ,hej i wr n f ly c ag dhm f as d no o nhs h t he ol d e e kig t al o g ul h r e i k e f pa toft cos ofm e ca ca e he r eved f hi hand. He s e r mbur e e f s h or r he t di l r ec i or s e ks ei s m nt or uc c t a c pe a i f pa n a s f rng. U pon r vi w oft r or how e r t co t os s nd om ns ton or i nd uf e i e e he ec d, ve , he ur fndst tt a ton mus be s i ha he ci t umm a iy dim is d asl aly fi ous. rl s s e eg l rvol The c t i r quie t dimis a a ton or cli fld by a prs r agans a our s e r d o s s ny c i am ie ione i t gove n ent le iy or ofi e i t c tde e m i s t ac i n or c ai i f i ous m a i i , r m a ntt fc r f he our t r ne he to l m s rvol , lc ous o fist saea cam o whc rle ma b g a td. 28U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) To sae a r al o tt li n ih eif y e rn e S. 91 A( )1. tt c us of a ton unde j1 a e ci r 983,a pli if mus esabls t the has be de i d ofrght antf t t ih ha en prve i s gua a e by t Consiuton or lw s oft Unie St t s a t tt s d prva i r s t r nt ed he tt i a he td a e nd ha hi e i ton e uled Thornburg v. Bristol, VA City Jail fom c r onduc c t omm itd by a pe s n a tng unde c o ofsa e lw . W es v.At ns 48 U. te r o ci r ol r t t a t ki , 7 S. Doc. 12 42( 988 . Thej i,ast onl dee n Thom btr ha nn di t saci i notaû ro ' 1 ) al he y fnda t tg s me n hi ton, s û s n' pe s be tt s i u d rj 1 8 P e l Re o 2 3F.d8 , 0 0W L 2 5 , t*1( t Ci. a u j c o ut n e 9 3. rva v. n , 0 3 21 2 0 0 91 a 4h r J n. 2000) (mpubls d) ( i W ilv.Mihia De tof Stt Polc ,491 U. 58,71 t ihe quotng l c g n p' ae ie S. Dockets.Justia.com 1 ( 9 9 M c y v. e a e k Co rcin lCe tr 7 8F. p 8 0,8 3 9 ( D. .1 9 ) 1 8 :; co Ch sp a e re to a n e, 8 Su p. 9 9 -4 E. Va 9 2 (i igct almmu efo s t ndno ap ro f r r s so j 1 8 ) tndn iyj i i n rm uia t e s n o pupo e f 9 3 . Be a s Th r b r c n tp e ali aj 1 8 cam a ans t ej i,h c u t imis s c u e o n u g n no r v i n 9 3 li g i t h al te o r d s se h sc mplitwi u prj ie pzs a tt j1 5 b () a lg l fi oo s1 Th Clr i i o an t t eudc , l u n o 91 A() 1, s e al rv lu . e ek s ho r y diece t s nd c e oft smemor ndum o ni a ac om pa ng o de t pl i if r td o e opi s hi a pi on nd c nyi r r o antf. ENTER:Thi X s da ofNove r 201 y mbe, 4. ChifUnie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udge ' The c talo f t tThor g' c r ntale tonsf i t sae aconsiui ly sg tc ntcli our s mds ha nbur s ure lga i al o tt tt tonal inii a am aantay nea teji.Posbl ngi n eb otcas i fiijt rparo rpaetetito t tk ohe g is n o th al si e el c y fiil,n aln o e i r elc h ol ro ae t r ge e s ft pe a to s smpl d e n tgv rs t a c ntmto lcam ato a l t e j 1 3 S e eg, u t aey r cuin , i y o s o ie ie o ny o si ina ll cin be md r 98 . e , ..Co ny ofSacament v.Le s 5 U . . 8 3 8 9( 9 8 (1 h Co si to d e n tg aa ted ec r o t p r o r o wi, 23 S 3 , 4 1 9 ) (T) e ntt in o s o u rn e u ae n he at f g u sae ofk i s la lt f neglgen l i lced ha m i cae i ly be t t t e hol 'of c tt i tt t al; ibiiy or i ty nfit r s tgorcal neah he hr s d' onsiutonal p oe to ) rtcins. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.