Warren-Bey v. United States Of America et al, No. 7:2014cv00531 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 11/7/2014. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL ER/8 OFFI U. Dl COURT CE s. sm ATDANVILE, L vA . I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STR I CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON TO N Y ALEX A ND ER W AR REN BEY , Pett oner, ii Fu : Eoe zRI l V N0 C? 2 1 V 21 JULI C. LEM Cœ A D C sNo7:14-cv-00531 * %EPUW CLERK ae . V. M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI UNI TED STATES OF AM ERI CA,e a . t l, R espondent s. By: H on.Jac t o L.K i e ls n sr Se or Unie St e Di t c Judge ni t d at s s ri t By isOc obe 1 201 Or r t c tnotfed Peii rofisi e t co t e a t t r 0, 4, de ,he our ii ttone t ntnt o nsnl nd add es hi ûpe ii f aDe a a or J m e a f aJ cilNotc o La ' a apeii n r s s t tton or clr t y udg nt nd or udi a ie f ws' s tto frawrtofha asc pus ptrua t 28U. C.j2254.TheOr ra sdPeii rt the o i be or , ls nt o S. de dvie ttone ha s o l c mp eea drt m af r j2 4moini h itn e t r ieteag me t i hs h u d o lt n eu o m 25 to f e n e d d o as h r u ns n i ç tton f raDe a a or J m e a f aJ cilNotc ofLa ' a ac lt r lal ck on s ii o pe clr t y udg nt nd or udi a ie ws' s ola e a ta hssaes ne e Peiine h srs o d d i iaigta h o j cst tec u tsc nsr cin i tt e tnc . tto r a e p n e ,ndc t h t e b e t o h o r' o tu to n oft S tton fraDe lrtr J he % ii o pe caaoy udgmenta f aJ ca Notc ofLa 'asaj225 nd or udiil ie ws' 4 pe ii Thus Iwilno tea t ç tto f raDe l r t r J men a f a J calNotc tton. , l t r t he < ii n o pe c a a o y udg t nd or udii ie ofLa s'a a pe ii n f r a wr tofha a c pus w ' s tto o i be s or . Pe ii rc ttone ompli t tt Unie St t a Com monwe 1h ofVigi ai tf hi a ns ha he t d aes nd at r ni den iy m asaçbl k'Amerc n ctz i vi a i oft Unied St t Co tt i at h he s ac ' ia iien n olton he t aes nsiuton lhoug ac knowl dgest the w asbom i t Com m onw e lh ofVi gi a He a s a guest tt e ha n he at r ni . lo r ha he Co n at o Vign alc e u idcint p o e u ehm.Ifn ta 1lc u idcin mmo we lh f r ii a k dj rs ito o r s c t i i d h t a kj rs ito Warren-Bey v. United States Of America et al ove t fi ousS tton f aDeca aor J r he rvol t ii or pe lr t y udgme a f aJ cilNotc ofLa . nt nd or udi a ie ws' ' Doc. 5 Ac o dngy ti a to i ds se wi u p eu ie a dP tto e ' mo inf rcaiiai n c r i l,h s cin s imisd t t rj dc , n eiin rs to o lrfc to ho a m o i f l a t pr ee L f m apa i a ede e nd ton or e ve o oc d q or upers r ni d. EN TER : Thi s da ofN o m be , 4. y ve r 201 l S i rU nie St t s Di t i tJ o t d a e sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
