Jones v. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulations and/or Board of Medicine and/or Nursing et al, No. 7:2014cv00524 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/30/2014. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL S OFF/ U. DI COURT ERK' G CE S. ST. AT ROANOKE, VA FJ LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI 02T 32 2 1 2j J A C. ULI BY; D O W A I A N M . N ES, I JO Pl ntf , ai if C i lA cton N o.7: :vvi i 14- 00524 V. , CL z M EM O R AN DU M O PI O N NI D EPA R TM EN T O F PR O FE SSI NA L O AND OCCUPATI ONAL REG ULATI ONS AND/ OR B O A RD O F M ED I N E A N D/ R N UR SI G ,eta . By: M i CI O N l, chaelF.U r banks i U ni e St esD i t i tJudge t d at src Dee fndants. t) Owain M . one ,pr ee ngpr K,tldacvi rght c ant purua t 42U. C.j ia J s oc di o ie i l i s ompli , s nt o S. 1 983,whie i a ce a e By isOr re e e Ocobe 1 201 t c ta s d pl i ift ta l nc r r t d. t de ntr d t r 6, 4, he our dvie antf ha f iur t upda e a m aii addr s afe at a f r o t ea e f o i r e a i wilr ul i di m i s l al e o t lng e s t r r ns e r el s r m nca c r ton l es t n s s a oft sac i n. hi to Thecour' mai t pli ifhasbe r t ned a unde i r bl ,a pl i ifha no c a t d ts l o antf en eur s lve a e nd antf s t ont c e t c ts ne Se e be 23, 4. Pl i i ff ie t c pl w ih t c tsO r rr qui i he our i e pt m r 201 a ntf a l d o om y t he our ' de e rng pl ntf t mai ai a ac ur t m a lng a e s The e or t c tfndst tpli iff ld t ai if o nt n n c ae ii ddr s . r f e,he our i ha antf aie o pr e ut t saci purua tt Fe a Rul ofCi lPr e e41b) byno c yi wiht os c e hi ton, s n o derl e vi oc dur ( , t ompl ng t he c u ts Or e .Ac o dn l I s s t ea to wih u p eu iea dd n a1 e igmoi n a o r', d r c r igy, dimis h cin t o t rj dc n e y lp ndn to s s moot SeeBalr v.Cars 882F. 93,96(t Ci.1 9)(ttngpr ltg nt aes bjc t tme . lad lon, 2d 4h r 98 sai o t iia s r u e t o i rquie t a r pe f co tor r a dimis i a a opraes nci f non- ompla el e rmens nd es ct or ur des nd s sal s n ppr it a ton or c inc ; Do n lvv J h - a v l S lsCo p, 7 F.d3 9 3 - (d Ci.1 8 )(e o n zn ad src n el . o nsM n il ae r .6 7 2 3 , 4041 3 r 9 2 rc g iig itit e c u t ys as o t ds s a a to p ts a tt Fe R. v. 41b ) o r ma u p ne imis n ci n t u n o d. Ci P. ( ). r Jones v. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulations and/or ...cine and/or Nursing et al Doc. 4 TheClr i die t d t s ndcopi oft sM e o a z Opi on a t a c pa ng Or r ek s rce o e es hi m r ndlm ni nd he c om nyi de t t pa tes o he r i . : t/ R EN TER :Thi - t day ofOc obe , 2014. s J t r 4 / -2.. /.?e 4+ ' # 2. r . , U nied St es Di t ctJ t at sri udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
