Jones v. President of the United States of America et al, No. 7:2014cv00515 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/30/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
clERx' OFFI u. Dl COURT - s CE s. sT. AT ROANOKE, VA FI D LE I TH E UN I N TED STA TE S D I STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A RO AN O K E D I SI N VI O OW AI AN M .JONES, I SEP 32 2 1 24 J A . ULI BY: D U , CL R CASE NO.7: 14CV0051 5 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O PRE SI DEN T O F TH E U N I TED STATE S, c K , By: GlnE.Conr e ad Chi Unied St e D i t i tJudge ef t at : s r c D ef endant s. Ow a i n M .J ia ones a Vi gi a i a e pr e ng pr K ,tl t sr mblng a l g y , r ni nm t oc edi o ied hi a i nd r el . ic mp e e il c mplita ans 9 d f n a t,icu ig s h o dy j ie p risa t e n o r h nsb e o an g i t 6 e e d n s n ldn uc d l on d a t s h e P ei e to t e Uni d Sae ,f d rla d sae c u t a d j d e i Vigni,n ws p r, r sd n f h t tts e ea n tt o rs n u g s n r i a e pa e s e ho pi l,g o ey so e ,c re ta d f nn rs rfs j i o t as imae , n p o e u o si s t s r c r t rs u rn n o e heif, al fkil, n t s a d r s c t r n a Roa noke Ciy a St f d Cot t a a l ls of o he i vi ua s J s c a m s a a t t nd afor m y, nd ong i t t r ndi d l . one ' l i ppe r o a lge t tt de e nt a a gr ha co pie t é low' a br d s cr m of u ea e le ha he f nda s s oup ve ns r d o t l ' oa pe tu a nr lt d a r e e t t afe tJ ,i l ng hi c i i co c i ,i e f r nc wih ci laci ns dve s ven s o f c ones ncudi s rm nal nvitons nt re e e t vi to h h sfld u c mf ra ej i c n iins a d a s utb a o h ri t .Asr l f J n ss e e a ie , n o o tbl al o dto , n sa l y n t e nmae ei , o e e ks e $250, 000 û o eorl s ' i da 000, t r m e s' n mage . Gi n t naur ofhi c am s t co tco t e a s ve he t e s l i , he ur nsnz d nd d c ee h spe dn a acv l ihsc mp an u d r4 U. C.j1 3 ( st te saec u t) o k td i la ig s ii rg t o lit n e 2 S. 98 a o h tt o rs a Bi nsv.Si Unkno Na Age sofFe Bura ofNarotc ,403U. 388(1 )( nd ve x wn med nt d. e u c is S. 971 as t t i fd r l o r a i j d e ) Up n rv e o t rc r , h c u tfn st a t ea to o hs e ea c u t nd t u g s. o e iw f he e o d t e o r i d h t h cin s Jones v. President of the United States of America et al Doc. 3 mus b s mma i d s se wih u p eu ie t e u rl imis d t o t rj dc . y The co tmus dim is a aci n orcli fl by a prs r a ns a gove nme a ur t s s ny to a m ied ione gai t r nt l e iy o of i e i t cour de e m i s t a t o or c a m i l vol ,m a i i us or f is t ntt r f c r f he t t r ne he c i n li s ç gi ous lc o , a l o s a e a cl i o w hi h r le m a be g a e or s e m one a y r i f om a de e n who i tt am n c ei f y r nt d; e ks t r elef r f nda t s Dockets.Justia.com i n fo s c rle . 28U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) ( ) A û rv lus' li i o et a ça ks mmu e r m u h eif' ' S. 91 A()1 , 2 . t ioo 'cam s n h t t c f l a a gua e bass et r i 1w ori f c . N et v v.W ilpms 4 0 U. 3 9,3 ,3 7 (98 ) n z bl i ihe n a n a t' izk ' li , 9 S. 1 25 2 1 9 - (n eprtn trv l u ' i f r r veso o 2 U. C.j 1 5d ) The c u ts Sauo y itr ei g t io o s' n o me ri n f 8 S. f 91 ( ). o r' tt tr a hort t sl ut iy o lmmarl dimis fi ous c iy s s rvol ompli s i l s the unus lpowe t pi c t ant nc ude t t ua r o er e he veloft c i he ompl i ' f c ua al tonsa dimi st e cai swhos f c ua c e i nsa e ants a t l lega i nd s s hos l m e a t l ont nto r cea ba el s' whi de c i é a a tc o deuso ls e ros' Neizke 490 U. a 327l dy s es 'or ch s rbe t nt si r l i na c na i .' t , f S. t 28. J s c us y cai s t t t 96 def nda s he ha nan ed ha c pie t one ' oncl or l m , ha he e nt s A ve ons r d o v ongf ly co c a ot r s de i J sofc tt i l pr e t d rght,f ls ey u l nvit nd he wie prve one onsiutonaly ot c e i s al quar l i t i ca s1 Ac o dn l ,h c u t l s mma i d s s t a to wih u p eudc u d r n h s ls . c r igy te o r wil u rl imis he cin t o t rj ie n e y j 1 5 b ( )a fi oo s a d wild s s a mo thi moin fra p nme to c u s l 91 A( )1 s rv lu n l imis s o s to s o p oit n f o n e, dic r a a he rng. The Cl r i die t d t s c e oft sm e a um o ni a s ove y nd ai e k s r c e o end opi s hi mor nd pi on nd a compa ng o de t pli tf c nyi r r o a n if ENTER: Thi Zö da ofSe e s y pt mber 2014. , Chi fU nie St t D i ti tJ e t d a es s r c udge 1 Dimis lwih u peudc la e Jne fe t p ru hscamsi sp rt,po el pe e td cvl s sa t o t rj ie e v s o s re o u se i li n e aae r p ry rsne ii acins I J to . f oneswihe t chale t vai t ofhi c me nt hema r ies cl m si apetton f a s so lnge he ldiy s onf me , y etl uch ai n ii or wrto ha e sc mu u d r2 U. C.j2 5 , fe fl e h usino saec u t e de. I h b l v sta te i f b a o s n e 8 S. 2 4 atr ul x a to f tt o r rme is f e ei e h t h e acinsofoneormor oft Roanokea e deenda shasvi aedhi co tt i rght2hema tl anew a to e he r a f nt olt s nsiutonal i s y ie nd s part ci la i i t sc t aspa tofhi co ai ,hemus sat f t a tt a l ea h de e nthas e a e vi cton n hi our; r s mpl nt t t e acs bou he ctons c f nda unde tken,pe s ly,i vi ain ofhi rght a s why t cli and deenda sa epr ry r s i t ra r onal n olto s i s nd how he ams f nt r ope l aied n he s m e ca e. J sm a fl asm iar s part aci i t Unied Stt D ititCour f t Ea tr Dititof a s one y ie i l , e ae ton n he t aes src t or he se n src Vigi a a i t a ofhi Stfor Count defndant. J r ni gans ny s af d y e s onesma not howe ,ama s muli e,concl or y , ver s tpl us y, unr ae cai a ns unr lt defndan si t s melws t a heha at e t do i t sc e. Se Fed.R. eltd l ms gai t eaed e t n he a a ui, s s tempt d o n hi as e Ci P.18& 20. v. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.