Jones v. United States District Court for Western District et al, No. 7:2014cv00499 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/30/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
clElrs OFFI U.. SX COURT -k CE S DI AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E U N I ED STATE S D I N T STR I C O U RT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I O N V SI O W A I A N M .JO N ES, I SEF 32 2 1 29 JULA . I BY: , LE CA SE N O .7: 4C V00499 1 Pl ntf ai if, M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI U NI TED STAT ES D I STR I C O U R T CT FOR W ES TERN DI STRI c AL , CT, By: Gln E. nr d e Co a Chi U nied St e D i t i Judge ef t at s s r ct D ef endant s. e hi ompli a i tt s a nt gans hi Owai n M .J ,a Vigi a i e pr e ng pr K ,fl d t s c ia ones r ni nmat oce di o . fd r ldititc u ta d tre o isj d e ,t e Ro n k Ciy Cic i Co r,Ge rlDitit e ea src o r n h e f t u g s h a o e t rut u t nea src Co t a J nie Dom e tc Reltons Cour, al gi a c pia y t de J nes hi ur, nd uve l si ai t le ng ons r c o ny o s c tt tona rghtt a ce s t c t G i n t na tr of hi c a m s t co tco t ue a ons iu i l i o c s he our . ve he tle s l i , he ur nsr d nd d c ee hi p e dig a acvlrg t c mpan u d r4 U. C. 1 8 (st t esaec u t) o k td s la n s ii ih s o lit n e 2 S. j 9 3 a o h tt o rs a dBie v. i Un n wnNa dAa nso F d Bt e uo Nac tc , 3U. 38 ( 9 )( s n v ns Sx k o me e t f e . l a f r ois 40 S. 8 1 71 a r t ti f d rlc u ta d isj d e ) Up n rv e o te rc r t c u t i d t a t ea to o h s e ea o r n t u g s. o e iw f h e o d,he o r fn s h t h cin mus b s mmmiyd s se wi u p eudc . te u l imisd t t rj ie ho The c tm us di m i s an ac i n or cl i f l d by a prs r a i t a gove n e a our t s s y to a m ie i one ga ns r m nt l e iy o ofk e i t c tde e mi s t a ton orcai i çfi ous m a ii ,o f is t ntt r t r f he our t r ne he c i l m s ûrvol , lcous r a l o sa e a c am on whi r i m a be gr nt d;ors e mone a y r le fom a de e tt li ch elef y a e e ks t r e if r f ndan who i t s i mmunefom s hr le '28U. C.j 1 5A( () ( .A Crvol 'cam i one t ttlc r uc eif' S. 91 b) 1, 2) t i ous' li s f ha ta ks Jones v. United States District Court for Western District et al Doc. 2 a a g bl basseiheri l ori fc. Neizkev.W ila ,490 U. 31 325,3 ( 9) n r ua e i t n aw n a t' t ' lims S. 9, 27 198 (ntr tngtrvol 'i f rve sonof28U. C.j 1 5( ) i emei t i ous'n onne ri f S. 91 d). An i vi l ma brng a ci ls t agans a f de a ndi dua y i vi ui i t e r lor sae ofk e f da ag tt t r or m es se ng fom ac tt i lvi ai tmmi r onsiutona olton.Bi ns 403 U. a 392;42 U. C.j 1 ve , S. t S. 983. J es udg , Dockets.Justia.com h we e, n o a s lt i nt a an tcv l li f rmo ea ydn g sf ra to tke i o v r e j y b ou e mmu iy g i s ii cams o n tr ma e o cins a n n terj dca f n to s S u v S a k n 4 5 U. 3 9,3 4 ( 9 8 .Thewele tbls e h i u iil u cin . t mp . p r ma , 3 S. 4 6 1 7 ) l sa ih d pu pos ofa ol ei muniy i t o i ult t de i i r e bs ut m t s t ns ae he c sonma ng pr s fom t ha ms me o t ki oce s r he r s nt f p o p ci eltg to ' W e talv.Er n 48 U. 29 2 5 ( 9 8 (u e sd d b sau eo r s e tv iiain. sfl ' wi, 4 S. 2, 9 1 8 ) s p re e y ttt n oh rgo n ) M o e v r c u t aeno G f- es' u jc t s i u d rBi n o j 1 8 . t e r u ds. r o e , o rs r t t tc r's be t o ut n e ve s r 9 3 oi The c rtssa u or a hort t sl a iy dimi sfi ous c pli s i l ou ' t t t y ut iy o lmm rl s s rvol om a nt ncudestt the unus lpow e t pi r e t ve loft c pl i ' f c ua a l ga i a di m i s t e c a m s ua r o e c he i he om a nt s a t l le tons nd s s hos l i whos f dua contntons a e cea l ba e e s' or whih de c i t a a tc or de usona e a l e i r l ry s l s ' c s rbe t nt si f l i l s e a is' Netk ,4 0 U. a 3 7 28 J ne 'c n l s r camst tj d e a d c u t ae c n ro . i e 9 S. t 2 - . o s o cu o y li ha u g s n o rs r ' z c pii t pr ven hi fom flng a s c s u ci l a ton f l s r y i t s cl sl ons rng o e t m r ii uc es f l vi c i al qua el n hi as . Ac o dn l ,hec u t l s mmaiyds s t ea to wi o tp eu ieu d rj 1 5 b ( ) c r ig y t o r wil u rl imis h cin t u rj dc n e 91 A( )1 h as fi ous The Clr i die t d t s nd c es of t s memor nd rvol . ek s r ce o e opi hi a um opi on a ni nd a compa ng or rt pli if c nyi de o antf . ENTER:Thi 31 da ofSe e , 2014. s y ptmber Chi fUnied St t DititJ e e t aes src udg ' The c tsr or r fec t t m a ci i a tonsJ shasfld i t l ts r we kshavebee ie n he as eveal e our ' ec ds e l t hat he ny v l c i one n ha de u e t c u tssa d r p o e t efracvlato tldb aprsne panit pls n t 28U. C. n ld nd r he o r' tn ad r cdl o ii cin ie y io r litf l ua t o r l r S. j1 1 () I J n swih st pls eacvia to i ti c u qh wil rq ie t p o iea popit rc r s 9 5b . f o e se o t u i l cin n hs o r e lbe e urd o r vd p r rae e od r c er ng t a tviy i hi i et s ac un f t prorsx- h pe i a t c e t pa ntoft onc ni he c i t n s nmat nzt co t or he i i mont rod nd o ons nt o yme he f lflng fe be or t a ton goesf war l he fist do s i a pa tc a ca e t tc ewilbedimis ul ii e f e he c i or d. f al o o n ny riulr s , ha as l s sed wih u p eu ie to t rj dc .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.