Muhammad v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2014cv00424 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 10/20/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
F*ie. :% - ' i I * A > I ,a 4 kiv C FD 1# G T1 1t 1 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O AN O K E D I SI N VI O M A LC O LM M U H A M M AD , Pl nt f , ai i f JU A C nL BY; . DEPUW CL Ci lA c i N o.7: 4- v- 24 vi ton 1 c 004 M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O H A R O LD CLA R K E,e al, t . Dee f ndant . s By: H on.Jac on L.K i er ks s Se orUnie St esDit itJudge ni t d at s rc M a col M uha m a a V i gi a i a e pr e ng pr K,fld a Compli tpuruan t 42 l m m d, r ni nm t oce di o ie an s to . U. C.j 1 na ngva i safoft Vigni De rme ofCore tons(ç S. 983, mi rous tf he r i a pa t nt rci d VDOC' a t ' nd he ) Ke nM ot ai Core to lCe e (I CC' a dee t.Thi matri beo emef e mt n rcina ntr I KM ' s fndans s te s fr ) or s re ng,ptrua t 28U. C.j1 5A.Afe rvi ngPli ifss sin,Idimist ce ni ls nt o S. 91 tr e ewi antf ubmiso s s he Co an wi o t rj dc a fioo . mplit t u p eu ie s rv lus h Pl ntf c ai if ompl i t ton M a 2 a 1 201 et rKM CC m aloo orbusne sofi ans ha y nd 6, 4, ihe ir m i s fce saf o t f pene t e opesfom t sc tnoti Pli ifspr s nc whi h al ge y vi a e d wo nvel r hi our n antf e e e, c le dl olt s VDOC Op rtngPr c d r 8 3. (t '. Oneo Plitf' p io g iv n e wa d e d eai o e u e 0 1 ( )1 OP' f an ifs rs n re a c s s e me f und be aus m a loom sa fdi not1 g andpr es o oft e l pe asl ga m al o ed c e ir tf d o oc s ne he nve o s e l i. Pl i ifc ude t tDe e nt vi a e t Fis,Fourh,a Foure nt Am e antf oncl s ha f nda s olt d he r t t nd te h ndme soft nt he U nie St t s Cons iuton w he s a fvi a ed t OP by o ni l ga m a lnoti hi pr e e. td ae tt i n t f ol t he pe ng e l i n s es nc Im us dim isa aci n o cam fl d by a i m a ei 1de e mi t tt aci o cam i t s s n to r li ie n n t f t r ne ha he ton r li s fi ousorfist saeacli onwhihrle ma begrntd.Se 28U. C.jj 1 5e)2) rvol al o tt am c eif y a e e S. 91 ( ( , 1 5 b)1 ; U. C.j 1 () Thefrtsa r i l scai ba e uponû ni s a y 91 A( ( ) 42 S. 997ec . is tndad ncude l ms s d t ndiputbl a Muhammad v. Clarke et al Doc. 8 m e il sl alt y,'t a msofi rng m e ofa lgali er s whih clary doe note s,' rtes eg heor 'k i cl nfi e nt e nt e t c e l s xit'or c ai swhe e t k ac ua c en i a e c ea l bas l s . N eiz v.W ila s 490 U . 31 3 lm r he l t l ont tons r l ry e e s' f ' t ke li m , S. 9, 27 ( 989 .AlhoughIlberlyc tuepr â c ans Hai v.Kene,404U. 51 5201 ) t i al onsr o q omplit, nes r r S. 9, 21 1Pl i ifpr f r t t OP s ys ç l icomi lgalc r s a ntf ofe s hat he a , ç ln A ng e ore ponde s l beopene a s r d fr nce hal d nd eache o c r ba ...o y i t pr enc oft ofe rt whom i i a e s d. onta nd nl n he es e he fnde o t s ddr s t ' ' Dockets.Justia.com ( 972) ldono a tasa i t sa 1 , t c n nmae' dvocae s s edeveopi saut ya c tt inal t, ua pont l ng tt or nd onsiuto camsn t la l rie i ac mpan .S eBmc v Car l,1 7F.d2 , 4 ( t Ci.1 9 ) li o ce ry as d n o lit e k . rol 0 3 41 2 3 4h r 9 7 ( tg, .c ri ;Be tv.CivofHn on,775F. 1 4,1 ( h Ci.1 .s as Luti J, oncurng) audet t mpt 2d 27 278 4t r 985) ee lo , Go do v.Le ke 574F. 11 11 ( h Ci.1 (e og zngt tadititc ti not r n e , 2d 47, 51 4t r 978) rc nii ha src our s e xpec e t a s e t r e ofadvoc t f a pr K pli it t d o s um he ol a e or o antf). . Pl n ifptr uesi s a y m e ils l ga t ore i t saci Fis,i i wel aitf ls ndiput bl rte s e l he i s n hi ton. r t t s l e tbls d t tt f c prs ofi i l ha notf lwedt i own i pe ntpolcisor sa ihe ha he a t ion fc a s ve olo her nde nde ie pr edu e c r s e i aj1 3aci oc r s amot ucc ed n 98 ton.Se e. ,UniedStt v. ees 440U. 741 e. c. t aes Cac r , S. , 7 2 5 ( 9 8 ; c i v. t. fFara 9 7F.d 1 5 ,1 6 (t Ci.1 9 ) S c nd Plitf 5 - 5 1 7 ) Rico Cny o ifx, 0 2 4 9 4 9 4h r 9 0 . e o , anif c nno pr ee a i tDe e nt i t sa i unde r s n t oc d gans f nda s n hi cton r e ponde ts ror Se e. ,M onelv. a upe i . e. g. l De tofSoc.Se v .436U. 658, n. ( 978) Pl nifac p' r s, S. 663 7 1 . aitf knowldgest themus d crbe e ha t es i a a ta ij r t saea a c s t c u t cam.Ho v r h dse a d t ece rye tbih d n cu lnu y o tt n c e s o o rs li we e , e irg r s h lal sa ls e 1w a dag e ta teij r i meeysafsviwigteç o fd nil n e s r d a n r u s h t h nu y s rl tf e n h t n i e ta u c n o e c c mmu iain 'a dt t ei e c e fo s o n a a t a ij r Cf Le sv. sy, 1 o n c to s' n ha h s x usd r m h wig n cu l nu y. . wi Ca e 5 8 U. 3 3 3 3n4( 9 6 (e u itngt en t nt a t eç cu lnu y' e ur me t wav d, S. 4 , 5 . 1 9 ) rp dai h oi h t h s ta ij r 'rq ie n be i e o a e ni aprs rwa a ol el de i ofall almaeil) Furhemor t or r sntt ve f ione s bs ut y prved 1 eg tras. t r e,he des e o Pl i iffom t sc ta e publcr c d a notc i ntal Ac or ngl Pl i ifptrues antf r hi our r i e or nd onfde i . c di y, antf ls i s t bl me il sl lt oresi t sa ton a ndipu a y rtes ega he i n hi c i boutt aleg vi a i n ofaVDOC polc he l ed olto iy, a dti matri ds se wi u prj d c a fi oo s p ru n t 2 U. C. 1 5 b () n h s te s imisd t t eu ie s rv l u , u s a t o 8 S. j 91 A()1 . ho EN TER : Thi a ofOc obe , 4. y t r 201 Se rU nie St t sD i ti tJ ni t d a e sr c udge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.