Jones v. Roanoke City Circuit Court Judges et al, No. 7:2014cv00408 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/29/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL S OFFJ U.s. SX X URT ERK' CE DI ATROANOKE, VA FI LED à I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTE RN DI STRI T O F V I I I C RG N A RO AN O K E D I SI N VI O AUG 2! 2 1 24 JULA I aY; C i lA c i No.7: 4- vvi ton 1 c 00408 O W A I A N M .JO N ES, I Pl nt f , ai i f t , cl - M EM O M N DU M O PI O N NI V. By: M i chaelF.U rbansd l U ni e St e D i t i Judge t d at s s r ct RO ANOK E CI CI TY RCUI T CO URT JUDG ES!e al. t . De e nts. f nda t) Owa in M . one ,pr e ng pr K ,fl d aci lrght c ia J s oc edi o ie vi i s ompli ,pur ua t 42U . C. ant s nt o S. 91 8 .ByOr e e trdAu u t5 2 4 tec u t ie tdplitf t s b t t i 1 d y 93 d r ne e g s , 01 ,h o r dr ce anif o u miwihn 0 a s fom t dat oft Or ra sae e ofa s t a a e c e ve ii d sa e e f m , n r he e he de t tm nt s e s nd n xe ut d rte tt m nt or a i na e a c m t c ountf m ,a a c r ii d c ofpl ntf st us f a co s a e e f t s xor nd e tf e opy ai if r t und c unt t t m nt or he i m ont pe i i me a ey pr ce ngt flng oft c h rod m dit l e di he ii he ompl i ,ob a ne fom t a opra e ant t i d r he ppr it prs ofii lofe c prs a whih pli tf i orwa c i dtrng t sxion fc a a h ion t c a n if s s onfned zi hat i mont pe i h rod. On Augus 27, 4, antf onl r t nedt i a ea oun f m . ai ifwasa s t ta t 201 pl i if y eur he nm t cc t or Pl ntf dvied ha f itr t c a lle o ompl wih a 1oft r quied pa r k woul r s ti dimi s loft sa ton y t 1 he e r pe wor d e ul n s s a hi c i wi u p eudc . t t rj ie ho M or t n 20 da ha ea ed,a pli ifha f ie t c pl wih t des rbe e ha ys ve lps nd a ntf s al d o om y t he c i d c ndto .Ac o dn l t ec t t imis stea to wih u p eu iea d srke t ec s o iins c r igy,h ol ds se h cin to t rj dc n ti s h a e r fom t a tve doc toft c t Pl ntf m a r iet cli si as pa at a ton o e r he c i ke he our. ai if y efl he am n e r e ci nc pl i ifi pr pa e t c pl wih t not d c tons antf s e r d o om y t he e ondii . The Cl k i die t d t s a co oft s M em or ndlm Opi on a ac om pa ng er s r c e o end py hi a z ni nd c nyi Or rt pl i i f de o a ntf . E NTER:Thi AQ s d yof g s, 2014. a Au u t 4/ r imr .F f V ? ' ' r -- ' Unie Stt DititJ e t d a es src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.