Hart v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, No. 7:2014cv00400 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/30/2014. (lab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STRI COU RT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STRI O F V I N I CT RGI A ROAN OK E DI I ON V SI CLERK' OFFI U. . D$T COURT : CE S 3 . AT RG NOKE, VA FIED L SEF 3s 2 1 29 J A qJ Dt c UL D . < RO SS C .H ART,CON SERV ATOR J ELL E. O OLRI GE, EW W D BY; . / , ' t . Ci lA cton N o.7: vi i 14CV 00400 Pli tf , a n if M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI UNI TED OF OM AHA LI FE W SUR AN CE CO M PAN Y, By: H on.G l n E.Conr d e a ChifUnie St t Diti J e e t d aes srct udg D e e nt f nda . Thi ma tri be or t c ur o d e ntsM otont Dim is A he rngon t m oton s te s f e he o t n ef nda ' i o s s. ai he i wasc onduce ea le t y. t d ri r oda St t d s ci ty, ai tf Ros C. a t Es , sc e v t f J w el E. ool i ,fl a e uc nc l pl n i f s H r, q. a ons r a or or e l W r dge ied t sa ton aga ns U nied ofOm a Lie I ur nc Com pa s e ng t c us Unied o Om a t hi c i i t t ha f ns a e ny e ki o a e t f ha o t r i t t o a m iy po i e whi h we e pur ha e by W ooli s da e m na e w m t lci s c r c sd rdge' ught r a i whi h e , nd n c W o li g i lse a te o e ,wi h refa d h rd u he a tej ita n ia t. l i ord e s itd s h wn r t es l n e a g tr s h on n utns t s h undiput d t t hea t polc ess c fc lypr vi a s cii d be ttf t lf oft a t s e ha t nnuiy i i pe ii a l o de pe te ne i or he i e he nnuiy c nr c, n aen ts be tt tr n to p irt tee dof h s e i e c nr c peid. s d o ta ta d r o u jc o emiain ro o h n t e p ct d o ta t ro Ba e i u pon t c t r vi w oft am uiy co r c s a i m uch a i i e s i ly undipu e t he our ' e e s he l t nt a t , nd nas s t s s enta l s t d, he c u t o cu e t tt a te h v n c s v lea daen ts be t otnniain. o r c n ld s ha he mmiis a e o a h au n r o u j c t e n to De enda ' m oton t d s i si w e l a n.Thet r soft a t polc esw e e c e ry f nts i o i m s s l t ke em he nnuiy i i r lal sat d on t f e oft c r c s Furhe m or bot polci s c ai d a t e y day ' r l ' te he ac he ont a t . t r e, h i e ont ne w nt ' ee ook' f pr son.l i we l sa ihe t t unde Vigi aLa a a i nt orana t i c r edwih ovii t s l e t bls d ha , r r ni w, n pplca f nnuiy s ha g t notc oft s a em e sc a ne i t unde l ng c r c . Gene a I .Co.ofRoa i e he t t nt ont i d n he ryi ont a t r l ns noke. nc. l v. Hart v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company Doc. 9 Pag 250Va. ( 9 ) e, 409 1 95 . A ccor ngl t s acton m us be di i sed.A n appr i e or w ilbe ent ed t sday. di y, hi i t sm s oprat der l er hi The Cl r i he e die t d t s nd a ce tfe c oft s o de t al c e k s r by r c e o e rii d opy hi r r o 1 ouns lofr c d. e e or a h cl ' EN TER t s , ' da ofSe e be ,201 hi D% y pt m r 4. f r O '*UAY -' ' CH I UN I EF TED STA TES D I STRI JUD G E CT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
