Ingram, Jr. v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2014cv00382 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/12/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ERKS OFF/ t,s. sE COURT C: l Dl AT RoAN(Ku,V ) 'A FI LED I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT M ROANOK E DI SI W ON ALC 12 2 1 24 J ZYUUA . , : L . . CASE NO .7: 14CV00382 JAM E S R .I M M , NG Pett o , ii ner M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI HAROLD W . CLARK, AL , :I By:Ho Gln E. nr d n. e Co a Chi Unie St esDit i tJudge ef t d at src Res ponde s nt . ied hi ii or i J mes R.l n ,a Vigi a i a e pr e ng pr K ,fl t s petton f a wrt of n ngr m r ni nm t oc edi o . ha e sc m u , zs n t 2 U. C. 2 5 c aln i te2 0 j d me to t eCic i Co r b a o s pl ua t o 8 S. j 2 4, h le gng h 0 3 u g n f h rut u t r f rt e Ci o Ro n k t e whih he sa d c n itd o ia mae o j c p n tain a d o h t f a o e md r c y tn s o v ce f n ni t be t e erto n s ntnc d t 40 ye r i prs n.1 The cou tfndst t peii n m us bes ma iy dim is d e e e o as n io r i hat he tto t um rl s s e 2 a s c e sv , u s a t o2 U. C. 2 4 (8. s u c sie p ru n t 8 S. j 2 4 1 Co r rc r sidc t ta I g a p e i u l fldaj2 5 p tto c nc mi gtes me u t e o d n iae h t n r m rv o sy ie 2 4 eiin o e n h a c n it n,I g n v. p rme tofCo rcins Cae No 70 CV0 3 4 ( . Va Oc.2 o vci n rm De a t n o re t , s . :5 0 3 W D. . t 0, o 20 5 . Th c r c nsr e l g a sc re tp tto a algn t tte p o e u in f i d t 0 ) e ou t o tu s n rm' u rn eiin s l ig ha h r s c to al o e e s i e a t s t vitm ' cot ng ie a a t lpur tdl us d t cla her a t rt e z nd e t he c i s l hi t ms nd owe pore y e o e n fe he c i a us d s a et c i t c r e I r m i o pladi g ly.The f c snec s r f t e rme nd e c r a tcs o oe c ng n nt e ng uit at es a y or hes cai swer r a l a l e t I a a t tm e ofti a a t tm e he fld hi pror lm e e diy vaiabl o ngr m t he i ral nd t he i ie s i j2254 peii a he fis t poi t a dee t i t pror j225 pr ee ngs Thus tton, nd al o nt o ny fc n he i 4 oc di . , 1Peii rorgi l fld hi aci n i t Unie Sut s Diti Cour f t Ea t m ttone i naly ie s to n he t d e srct t or he se DititofVigi a. He syld hi s src r ni t e s ubmison a a GM oton f r Evi nta y Hea i 'butt si s û i o de i r rnp' he Ea tm Ditit c t e a dockeed i as a j225 peii a ta f re t c e t t s se src onsnzd nd t t 4 tton nd r nse r d he as o hi c tbec us Roa our a e noke i l a ed i t sdi t i t s oc t n hi s rc . Un e Rue4 b o t eRue Go enn j2 5 Cae ,h c u t y s mmai ds s a d r l () f h ls v r ij 2 4 ss te o r ma u rl imis y 92 4 p tto %ll ipli y a pe r fo tepeiln a a y a tc d e hi t ta t peilne i no 25 eiin tif t anl p a s r m h tto nd n ta he x bis h t he tto r s t e il t r i i t diti cour .' ntted o elef n he srct t' E l am ' cure pe ii i a s e nt one, f lng unde t pr hi ton i 28 U. C. ngr s r nt tton s ubs que ali r he o bii n S. j224449 agans as ondors c svepeiin. 1 i t ec uc esi tto Ptrua tt j2244(9,af r dititcour ma c i ras co ors ce svej2254 ls n o 1 edeal src t y onsde e nd uc si pe ii onl i pe ii r s c le s cii c rii ton fom t Unie St t s Co tofAppe l tton y f ttone e tr s pe fc e tfcai r he t d a e ur as f rt Fo rh Cic tt t h camsi tep tto me t e ti c i ra j2 4 b ( ) Be a s o he u t rui ha t e li n h ei n e c ran rt i. 2 4()3 . c u e i e I a doesnotde onsr t t thehasob a ne s h c rika i by t Co tofAppea s t ngr m m ta e ha t i d uc e tf ton he ur l, he c u twi ds s tep tto wi o tp eu iea s c e sv . An a p o it o d rwile tr o r l imis h eiin t u rj d c s u c sie l h p r prae r e l n e t sda hi y. The Clr i dieced t s nd co es oft s me or ndlm opi on a a ompa ng ek s r t o e pi hi m a l ni nd cc nyi or rt pe ii ne . de o tto r F xTsR:n i 1 & d yo Au u t 2 4 s @ a f g s, 01 . Chi fUnie St t sDiti J e t d a e srd udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.