Thompson v. Zych, No. 7:2014cv00377 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 8/12/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U. Dt COURT S CE S. ST. AT ROANQKE, VA FI LED I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI R O A N O K E DI I O N V SI ALC 12 2 1 29 J UI . U A BX I Uf ' -' l' . .-. . , G OLDY TH OM PSON , CASE NO .7: 14CV00377 Pett oner, ii M EM O M N DU M O PI NION CH R I STO PH ER ZY C H , By: H on.G l n E .C onrad e C hi fU ni e St e Di t i tJudge e t d at s s r c R es pondent . Gol Thomps a f r i e pr e ng pr K ,fl t s pe ii f a wrt of dy on, ede al nmat oce di o ied hi tton or i ha s cor ,purua t 28 U. C. j22 ,c le ng t c c ai of hi tr of bea pus s nt o S. 41 halngi he alulton s em c i nt by t Bura of Prs Ct '. The c tfnds t t t peii mus be onfneme he e u ion BOP' ) our i ha he tton t s l m arl di m i s d. 'm iy s s e 1 Spe ii a l Thomps a gue t the i e ild t c e tagans hi s e f r t c fc ly, on r s ha s ntte o r di i t s entnce o he pe i o tme he s ntunde hom e confne e wih a elc r ni m o t i de c on hi rod f i pe r i m nt t n e to c niorng vie s a è f om M a c 3 t D e m be 1 201 H e i m i t ke nkl , ' r r h o ce r 9, 2. s s a n. Fe r l1 w r quiest t de a a e r ha ()d fn a ts l begv n ce i twad t s r ie o atr o i io me t a ee d n hal ie rdt o r he e vc f e m f mprs n n f r a y t h h s s e ti o cald tnin p ir t t e d t t sn e c o n i e a p n n y i ee t ro o h ae he e tn e me o c omme es( )a ar ul oft ofe ef rwhih t snt ewasi e or nc 1 s es t he fns o c he e enc mpos d ( )a ar s l o a y oh rc r ef rwhih t d fn a twa arse atrt e 2 s e ut f n t e hag o c he ee d n s ret d fe h c mi so oft ofe e f whi t s nt nc wa i om s i n he f ns or ch he e e e s mpos t tha no bee ed; ha s t n c e t d a ns a he s nt e. r die gai t not r e enc i pe n 1 U. C.j 3 8 (9 (mp a i a d d . l i wel es a ihed t t tcr tfor tmt s nt i 8 S. 5 5 1 e h ss d e ) t s l t bls ha t edi û fcildee i unde j3585 i a lbl onl t t edee nt whoweedeanedi a ofi a tnton' r *) s vaia e y o hos fnda s r ti n te lo c re to a fcl y'j 3 21b ,a d who wee s b e tt BOP' c nr l Re o v. p na r o r ci n l a ii , 6 () n t r u jc o s o to . n Ko a ,51 U. 5 ,5 ( 9 ) S n eç 3 8 ( )r d c sad fn a tsGmp io me t b t ry 5 S. 0 8 1 95 . i c t 5 5 b e u e e e d n ' i rs n n ' y he j 1 Se Ruls1b & 4, e Go r ngSe to 225 Cas s(u h ii dimis l ha a e e ( ) Ruls veni cin 4 e a t orzng s s a of be s peiinwhe ei plil a a sfom f c ofpeiint a p tto ri n te tte t ha e sr ig. tto r t any ppe r r a e tto h t eii ne s o nild o b a el e n ot o tm e s nti G fcilde e i n'be or hi s nt e,...t pe i ofpr s t nc m mt f i pe n ofi a t nto f e s e enc he rod e en e e t tnton'mus bee vaentt t tmprs dee i t qui l o he i ionmen 'is f' I a 59. çl-i s nto home t tel.' d. t û-lme pe n l c i m e wih elc r c m oniorng doe not c tt t tme s r ed i t fcilde e i ontne nt t e toni t i s onsiu e i e v n ofi a t nton' t e 1 U. C. 3 8 ()' Ge r ev. ad n, 10 CV1 7 2 0 W L 2 5 2 6a * ( D. md r 8 S. j 5 5b . o a W r e No. :7 4 , 0 8 ' 9 4 4 t 4 N. W . .2 0 )( u t Uni d S ae v.P i ,1 7 F.Ap x 9 2 9 2 ( t Ci. 0 )(i i n Va 0 8 q oi ng t tts rne 6 e p' 6 , 6 4h r 20 8 cito s omitd) te . Bec us Thomps i note ildt t rle hes kst rj2241- cedi a ns hi a e on s ntte o he eif ee mde - r t gai t s f r l c i i s nt nce f t m on hs he s t on hom e c i m e - t c t w il ede a rm nal e e or he t pen onfne nt - he our l s umm a iy dimi shi pe ii rl s s s tton.An a opra eor rwili s t sda ppr it de l s ue hi y. The Cl r i die t d t s nd c es of t s m e a um o ni a a co pa ng e k s r c e o e opi hi mor nd pi on nd c m nyi o de t pe ii r r r o ttone . ENTER:Thi lZ M dayofAugus, 2014. s t Chi fUnied St t D i t i tJ e t a es sr c udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.