Wyatt v. Clark, No. 7:2014cv00299 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 06/17/2014. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
R ppÅ sOFFI U. DI CÅ r CE S. ST. AT ROANOKE, A V Fl :D ! . I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI M I AEL E DW A RD W YA TT , CH Petii toner, J 1 21 UN 29 J A C. ULI BY: DEP L CLERK EY, CL ERK Ci lA cton N o.7: 4- vvi i 1 c 00299 M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O V. By: HAROLD CLARK, H on. Jam esC .Tur k Se orUnie St e Dit itJudge ni t d at s s r c R es pondent . e ii or M iha Edwar W yat aVigni i t pr ee ng pr K ,fl d a petton f m itof c el d t r i a nma e oc di o . ha ascor , s ntt 28U. C.j2254.Pettone c le st vai t ofhi be pus purua o S. ii r halnge he ldiy s c nfn me tpls a t oteDe e e 1 , 01 j g n o t eCic i Co r o Pityv ni o i e n t u n t h c mb r 9 2 2 ud me t f h r ut u t f ts la a r Cot y.Aferr viwi t peii t c tfndst ti s d be dimis d s ma iy mt t e e ng he tton,he our i ha t houl s s e um rl purua t Rul 4oft RulsGoveni j2254 Caesl s nt o e he e r ng s . A fdealco tma no grntaj2254ha speiinunls t peii re use t e r ur y t a bea tto e s he ttone xha td he r m e e a ia ei t co t oft sa ei whi h peii ne wa c c e 28U . C. e di s va lbl n he urs he tt n c tto r s onvit d. S. j225 1 Pr ie v. i z, U. 475( 973) Slvt v.Smih, U. 53( 971. 4(9; es r Rodrcue 411 S. 1 ; a on t 404 S. 1 ) Thee usi r ie e i s ts i by s e ng r vi w oft cam i t hi s sae c t xha ton equ r m nt s a ifed e ki e e he li n he ghe t t t our wihj rs ito t c nsd r h cam.O' u l nv Bo rk l5 6U. 8 8( 9 9 .I t u id ci n o o ie t e li S li . ec e, 2 S. 3 1 9 ) n va Vigni anon- a h r c c c n e us saer m e e i oneoft r ewa ,de nd ng on r i a, de t ow onvit a xha t tt e di s n h e ys pe i t na ur oft c am sr s d.Fis,t c c c n tl adiec a a t t Vigi a Co tof he t e he l i aie rt he onvit a ie r t ppe l o he r ni ur Appe swih a s e al t ubs quen a t ppea t t Supr m eCour ofVigi ai t Co tofAppeasr es l o he e t r ni f he ur l ul agans t c c.VA. i t he onvit CODE j1 1411.Se ond,hec c c nat kt conviton 7.c t onvit a tac he ci colat r l by t lng a s a e ha aspe ii w ih t cic tc t he e t c c was l e aly ii t t be tton t he r ui our w r he onvi t convitda t na ai a ad rede sont t Supr meCo tofVigi a.I j8. ce nd he ppe lng n ves cii o he e ur r ni d. 01 1A peii m a bedim is d pu s ntt Rul 4 i i i ce rfom t peii t tapeii ri no e il t tton y s s e r ua o e f t s la r he tton ha ttone s t ntted o r le . eif 6 4( ( ) Va S p. . 59 a .Fial t c n it a e h us r me i sb tln asae 5 A)1 ; . u Ct R. :() n l he o v c c n x a t e d e y iig tt y, habe peii diecl wiht Supr Cour ofVigi a.VA. as tton r ty t he eme t r ni CODE j8. - A)1) 01654( ( . W hihe rr e i tke t convituli t l m us pr s ntt c am st t Supr m eCour of c ve out s a n, he c tma ey t e e he l i o he e t Vigi a a r ceve arzi fo t tc t f e af de alditi tco tca c i rt r ni nd e i tlng r m ha our be or e r src ur n onsde he cl m s A ha aspe ii rha note used sa er medisi t pe ii rhast rghtunde ai . be ttone s xha t t t e e f he ttone he i r sae 1w t r i et q si n pr s t by a a ia epr ed ea f l t do s 28U. C. tt a o a s he ue to e en ed ny va lbl oc ur nd ais o o. S. j2254() c. Thepe ii c e ry s tton l a l howst tPeii rha no pr s nt cai st t Supr m eCou t ha ttone s t e e ed l m o he e r ofV igi a.2 Pettone ' f l et e us saer m e esm a t s r ni ii r s aiur o xha t t t e di ndaes umm a y dimi s lo t r s s a f he peii .3 Ba ed upont fndi t tPe ii ne hasnotm a t r quiie s t nta s tton s he i ng ha tto r de he e st ubsa il howi ng ofde alofa co tt i ni ' ns iutonalrghta r quied by 28 U .S. j2253/) ac ri t of i se r C. , e tt e ka a albiiy i de ed. ppe a lt s ni ' 7 / X V/ . EN TER : Thi s da ofl y une, 4. 201 > y ,. ' . ,. . 2 . , 7x j w, e o Unie Stt DititJ ni r t d a es src e 2Peiine pr e sonl cam sofi feci as itnceofc ms l A lho hefld adie ta a t t tto r es nt y li ne f tve ssa ot e. t ugh ie r c ppe l o he Supr Cour ofVigi a cli ofi fe tveasit nceofc ns lar r viwa evi onl aha aspr e ng eme t r ni, ams nef ci ssa ou e e e e bl a y be oc edi a dn tvadrc a pel Sg nv. r o teDe t fCor, 8 Va 5 6, 3 73 S. 2 9 5 9 (01 ) n o i iet p a. imo Di. fh p'o r.2 5 . 2 5 3, 9 E.d 0 , 08 2 3 . Pettone hasnotpur ued a ha sr m e w ih t Supr m e Cour ofVigi a A c r n y,i i c e t ii r s ny bea e dy t he e t r ni . co di gl t s l ar hat Peii rha no e use sa ec t e esf rt i fe i as itnc ofc ms cai . ttone s t xha td tt our r medi o he ne fctve ssa e ot el l ms 3Peiinerma r tl hi f de al bea pe ii i heuns ce s ul pr s nt t cli t t Su e Co t tto y eie s e r ha s tton f uc s f ly e e s he ams o he pr me ur ofV igi at ough oneoft t e r esdes i d.Peii ri advied,howe ,t thi tm et fl saea r ni hr he hr e out crbe ttone s s ver ha s i o ie tt nd fd rl b a peio si l td.S e28U. C. 2 4 4 VA. e ea ha e s tin s i e e t mi S. j 2 4*; CODEj80165 ( () Va S p. . 5:() . - 4 A)2 ; . u CtR. 9 a. 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
