Muniz v. Charlotte County Sheriff Office, No. 7:2014cv00294 - Document 88 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/7/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cLEM s OFFI U. DIT. UR' CE S. S X r ATO ' I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A R O A N O K E D I SI N VI O M A TTH EW M U NI Z, Pl ntf ai if, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V. CH A RL O TTE C O UN TY SHERI OFFI FF CE,e J/ t , Deendants. f t) I SONBURG VA FIFn I Aœ 2? 2 1 25 J I D au: cu ( A ë x Ec Ci lA c i No.7: 4- v- 29 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM O M N DU M O PINION By: Mi chaelF.U rbans ki Unie St e Dit i tJudge t d at s s r c M a t w M uni pr e ng pr K,iedacvirg sc the z, oce di o tl i l iht ompli ,ptrua tt 42U. C.j ant ls n o S. . 1 3.I a mu ha panifi n ln e a imae p an ifi n lng rs b e t ote 98 n s c s li tf s o o g r n n t, litf s o o e u j c t h pr son oft Prs rLii to Re or Ac ,whi h a l d pl ntf t pa t $350. ovii he ione tgai n f m t c lowe ai if o y he 00 flng f evi i t lm e s By Or rentr J y 23,201 t c ur diec e pl ntf t s i ii e a nsal nt . de e ed ul 5, he o t r t d ai if o ubm t wihi 1 da fom t dae o t Or rt f lflngf of$400. orot r s r s ndt t n 0 ys r he t f he de he ul ii ee 00 he wie e po o t Or rwihi tn( 0)da oft Or rsenr Fallet payt f i f lorot r s he de t n e 1 ys he de' ty. itr o he ee n ul hewie rs e pond a t m a nt i a a r s ofr cor s l r ul i t di m i s oft a ton wihout nd o i a n n dd es e d ha l es t n he s s al he c i t p eudc .Plitf wa a v sdt a afiu et c mpywo l r s l i ds s a o ti a to rj ie an if s d ie h t alr o o l ud e ut n imis l f h s ci n wih u p eu ie to t rj d c . M or t n 10 da ha elps d, nd pli ifhasf l t c e ha ys ve a e a antf aied o ompl wih t des rbe y t he c i d c n iin .Ac o dngy tec u t imis st ea t nwih u p eu iea dsrk st ec s o dto s c r i l,h o r d s se h ci t o t rj dc n tie h a e o f o t a tve doc oft c t Pl i ifm ay r fl t c a m si a s pa a e a ton once r m he c i ket he our . a ntf e ie he l i n e r t c i pl i ifi pr pa e t c pl w ih t no ed co tons a ntf s e r d o om y t he t ndii . Muniz v. Charlotte County Sheriff Office Doc. 88 The Cl k i die e t s nd a co oft s M e or ndum Opi on a a co pa ng er s r ct d o e py hi m a ni nd c m nyi o r t pl nt fder o ai if. EN TER ; Thi s C d yo Au ut2015. a f g s, Unie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udg Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
