Wells v. Warden, FCCW, No. 7:2014cv00292 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 7/14/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ERKS OFFI U. DI COURT CE S. ST. AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I THE UNI S N TED TATES DI CT COURT STRI FO R TH E W ROANOKE STRI T O F V I I I ESTER N DI VIC ON RG N A DI SI JUL 1i 2 1 04 J I . UL L RK E BY; TI M ARI W ELLS, NA E CASE NO .7: 4CV00292 1 Pet toner, ii V. M EM O R AN D U M O PI I N N O W A RD EN -F. . W . C C. , By: H on.G l n E.C onr e ad C hi fU nie St e D i t i Judge e t d at s s r ct R e ponde . s nt Ti M a i W e l ,a Vi gi a i a e pr ee ng or K , fl d t s pe ii n f a w rt of na r e ls r ni nm t oc di o ie hi tto or i . ha s c pusptrua t 28 U. C.j2241 ppae l c le ng he c i me unde a bea or ls nt o S. ,a rnty halngi r onfne nt r j d me t aVign asaec u t l he p tto W el alg stef l wi : u g n of r ii tt o r. n r ei n, ls le e h ol ng i o Gr ound one:Btr n ofPr lde oof Suppori FACTS:Unie Stt sv.Robe tL. e s ve h c r ui J 25, tng td ae r Re d e nt ic t une 1 993.Lega l a t Idi no t r tnd i. l ns niy. d t mde sa t G ns niy' f pur e ofd e ntsi a t def ns ,waslga t r ;Coursof l a t ' or pos s ef nda ' ns niy e e l e l em t Appe sdi nota k whe he def nda wasi a by ps hiti orps hol c l al d s t r e nt ns ne yc a rc yc ogia sa r but r t r as onl wheher de e ntha esa ihed i a t a t nda ds , a he ked y t f nda d tbls ns niy s dei dbyl li a t Defns Reor Ac 1 U. C.j 1 fne ega ns niy e e f m t 8 S. 7. ( t 3. No.1. Pe. ECF ) Upon i ta r vi w of W e l' pl di t c rtc tonaly fl d t peii a niil e e ls ea ng, he ou ondii l ie he tton nd ad s d W e l t i c d notdic r a c z bl f r lha ascl m fom t alegai nsi vie ls hat t oul s e n ogni a e ede a be ai r he l to n he pe ii The co tdie t d W el t s r tton. ur r c e ls o ubmi a mor defnie sa e t e i t t t mentofhe cli swihi < am t n t n da . W e l di no r s e ys ls d t e pond. Ptrua t Ruls1a a 4oft RulsGove ngSe ton 2254 Cas ,t cour mus ls nt o e () nd he e mi ci es he t t dimisaha ascom uspe ii n t fi pl nl a a sfom t peii a a a tche e bis s s be tto t t ai y ppe r r he tton nd ny ta d xhi t i t t t pe ii r i not e il d t r i . . ha he ttone s ntte o elef Be us W e l aleg no c za e f der l ca e ls l es ogni bl e a ha as cor cai ,t c u' fnds t t i pli y a be pus l m he ot t i ha t a nl ppea s t t s i not e il d t r i 1 r ha he s ntte o elef Ac o dngy t c u tds se t sa to wih u p eu c t W el' p o tnt t rfl h r c r i l,he o r imis s hi cin t o t rj die o ls o p ru i o ei e y e pe ii tton. N EN TER: Thi l4. da ofJ y, 201 s ' ' y ul 4. ChifUnie Stt sDiti J e t d a e srct udge 1 M or ove , aj2 41h be sc r u p tto i o di rl t a opraer m e f a i aechalngi e r 2 a a o p s eiin s r naiy he ppr it e dy or n nm t le ng t e cui ofhe s t nc r t rt n t valdiyofherco c i ors nt e. I r J ,226 F. 328,333he xe ton r en e e, ahe ha he i t nviton e enc n e ones 3d 3 (t Ci. 0 )(mdngc le g t fd r lc n ito bard fo rve t e j22 a e tso n t t 4 4h r 20 0 f i haln e o e ea o vcin re rm e iw md r 41 bsn h wig ha t e potc n ito c a g i lw,p tto e ' ofn ec n u ti n lng rci n l. W el d e n tidct md r s-o vcin h n e n a eiin rs fe s o d c s o o e rmia) ls o s o n iae t the ofe eco ti no l rco i r d c i nald t a pos-onviton c ngei t l ll c ha r f ns nduc s onge nsde e rmi ue o ny tc ci ha n he ega ands ape. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.