Peyton v. Clark, No. 7:2014cv00220 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 05/14/2014. (kab)

Download PDF

a FpÅ s OFFI t, Dl CÅ r CE Js. sm AT ROANOKE, VA FI P7 7 : L I TH E U M TED ST ATES D I N STR I T C O U RT C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI JACOB D.PEYTON, MAt 14 2 1 Ã¢j JULA C. I BK IE , . CLERK . ' i7 ' DEP CLERK CASE NO .7: 14CV00220 Pett oner, ii M EM OM NDUM OPI O N NI H A R O LD CLA R K , By: H on.Gl n E.C onrad e C hi fU nie St t s Di t i tJudge e t d a e s rc R e ponde . s nt J co D .Pe on,a Vig ni i a epr e ng pr K ,ha s itd a pl a ng e il a b yt r i a nm t oc edi o s ubm te e di ntted C I RULE 60 M OTI , as ng t s c tt vac t a r ce r i by t Supr m e Cour of ON ' ki hi our o ' a e e nt ulng he e t Vigi a. Bec us Pe o s al tons as a whol s r ni a e yt n' lega i e oughtt voi t uni ntfed sa e c t o d he de ii tt our c i na j rmi l udgmen unde whihhei c re l i ac r t t co tdoc tdhi pla nga a t r c s ur nty nc re aed, he ur kee s e di s peii frawrtofha asc pus purua t 28U. C.j225 tton o i be or , s nt o S. 4.Upon rviw oft r or , e e he ec ds howe r t co tc l st thi petton,by wha e rna e m us be s ve , he ur onc ude ha s ii t ve m , t umm miy dim is l s s ed f f l et sa ea g ound f r i .1 or aiur o t t ny r or elef Pe o a s rs t t durng sae c i i l pr e ngs i t Augusa Count Cic t ytn s e t ha i t t rm na oce di n he t y r ui Cour,t Com monwe t ofe e Peyt apl a ba gan f a s t nce ofs ve yea sa e g t he alh f r d on e r i or en e e n r nd i ht m on hsi prs n whi h co eldi no pr ry e an o r viw wih Pe on i wrtng.Afe t n io c uns d t ope l xpli r e e t yt n ii tr Pe on' co c i a die ta a s he fld a sae ha asc puspe ii i 2011 alegi yt s nviton nd r c ppe l , ie t t be or tton n , l ng t tc ha ouns lpr vi d i feci a ssanc wih r r t t pl bar n ofe . The Cic t e o de ne f tve s it e t ega d o he ea gai f r r ui Cour de e t pe ii wihout r viw of t m e is a Peyt s ha s a t nid he tton t e e he rt , nd on' bea ppea i t l n he Supr me Cou of Vigi a a hi f de a ha as cor peii we e alo uns c s u . e rt r ni nd s e r l be pus tton r s uc es f l 1 Un e Rue4()o te RulsGo rig j2 4 Cae ,tec utma smmai ds s a j2 4 dr l b f h e venn 25 ss h o r y u rl imis y 25 p tto <ifipli ya per fo tep tto a da y atc de hbt ta tepeio e i n te t ldt rle eiin tl t anl p as rm h ei n n n tahe x iis h t h tin r s o nie o eif l i t t i t dit i tcour . n he sr c t' ' Pe o te fldaÃ§ ( . d An )80 -28 Mo int Va ae- Se Asd Vod J d me t' ytn h n ie $ Va Co e n. .14 ) to o c t ( t ie i u g n, ' CL30001 00,i t Cic tCour,r ii t ss m ei f c i a ssa cli . The Cic t 467- n he r ui t a sng hi n nefe tve s it nce a m r ui Co tdimi s d hi pe ii a t Supr m e Cour ofVigi a r f e hi s e nta al ur s s e s tton, nd he e t r ni e us d s ubs que ppe , Re or No.1 320.Now,Pe on rle o Rul 60 ( oft Fe r Rul ofCi lPr dur c d 31 yt eis n e b) he deal es vi oce e a au hort f an or rfom t sc tva tng t Su e Cour ofVigni sor rr f i s t iy or de r hi our cai he pr me t r i a' de e usng hi appe l s a. Lo rfd r lc u t,lk t i o ,d n th v j rs it n t c n u ta p laer ve we e ea o rs ie hs ne o o a e u idci o o d c p elt e iw o o a y saec u ts u g n . Pllrv. o r ,1 9F.d7 , 31( t Ci.1 9 ) J s ito f n tt o r' j d me t ye M o e 2 3 28 7 4h r 9 7 . mi dcin f r a p lae rv e o sae c u tj d me t l se cusv l wi s peir sae c u t a d o p elt e iw f tt o r u g n s i x l iey t u ro tt o rs n , e h uli tl wih t Unie Stts Suprme Cour. J ;28 U. C.j1 tmaey, t he td ae e t #. S. 257. Buts j. a 73 ee .. t 2 /s (e o n zn lwe fd r l o rs j rs ito t rviw fn lu me t ofsaec u t i fd r l rc g iig o r e e a c u t' u id cin o e e ia j dg n s tt o rs n e e a e or o he xtnt ha ytn ee o zs ha asc puspr ee ngst rj225 . Ther f e, t t e e t tPe o s kst ptrue be or oc di mde 4)2 a a n ppea i t s c tfom ar i by t Supr m e Cour ofVigi a he sa e no gr und f l n hi our r ulng he e t r ni , t t s o or r le . e if Pe o as h sn g o n f rd rc rle fo asaec u t u g n t rRul 6 () ytn lo a o r u d o ie t eif ' m tt o r j d me t mde e 0b . r The Fede alRul ofCi lPr e le,by t rown tr ,onl Ã» r es vi oc dtr hei e ms y l l t pr dtr i a lci l gove. he oce le n 1 vi n a tons a pr e ngs i t Unie Stt sdititcours ... Fe R.Ci P.1 Ther f e, ci nd oc edi n he t d a e src t. ' d. ' v. . e or 2 To tee tn ta Pe tn itnd t se rlaefo ic reaint e te20 8j d me to te h xe t h t yo ne s o e k ee s rm n acrto t r h 0 u g n f h nd AugusaCount Cic tCou tc ci hi ofbr a ng a e e i andgrnd lr ny,hi pr entpe ii wo d t y r ui r onvitng m e ki nd ntrng a ace s es tton ul b po el c nsr e a d sl rl ds se a as c siej2 5 peiin. Ho v r c u t e odsi iae e rp r o tu d n ' y mmai imisd s uc esv 2 4 t o y t we e, o r r c r ndc t ta Pe o h sara ypls e j22 4rle rg r igt sud me t Se Pe o v. ak CaeNo 7:2CV0 7 h t ytn a led tru d 5 eif e adn hij g n . e vtn Clr , s . 1 05 4 ( . Va 20 3,a o a ds se ,No.1 -6 8 (t Ci.2 4 . s Pe o sc re tp tin i as b e u n W D. . 1 ) p e l imisd 37 5 4h r 01 ) Thu , ytn' u rn eio s u sq e t t o e fligu d rtepo iiini 28U. C. 2 4 *)a ans asc n o s c esvepeiin. n ,al n e h rhbto n n S. j 2 4 g i t e o d r u c si tt o P ru n t j2 4 49, fd rldsrc c u t y c n ie asc n o s c e sv j2 4peiin o y i u s a t o 2 41 a e ea itit o r ma o sd r e o d r u c sie 25 tt nl f o peiine s c e s ci ce tt ai fom t Unie Stt Cour ofAppeasf rt Fourh Cic tt tt cl ms tto r e m s pe t ri ton r he t d aes ic k t l o he t r ui ha he ai i te p tt n met cran ci ra j2 44 () P ytn d e n t d mo srt ta h h s o tie s c n h eii o e e ti rt i. 2 09 3. e o o s o e n tae h t e a ban d u h e c ttc tonby t Co tofAppeas erii ai he ur l. 2 t erl c hes ues nnnotpr de a ve cl by whi h a ltg m a s e r i fom a sa e c t ovi hi e c ii ant y e k elef ' r ny tt our rzi wha s ve ,c i i orcvi. t ng l toe r rm nal i l Be us Pe on' alegai i t s pe ii do not sae a gr ca e yt s l tons n hi tton t t ny ound on whih he i c s e il t r le i t s c rt hi pe ii mus be s m ma iy dim is d. An a opra e or r ntted o e if n hi ou , s tton t u rl s s e ppr it de wile e t sda l nt r hi y. The Clr i die t d t s nd c e of t s m e or nd o ni n a a ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi s hi m a um pi o nd cc nyi o de t pe ii r r r o ttone . ENTER:Thsll d yo Ma , 2014. i &- a f y Chi Unie Sut DititJ ef t d es src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.