Hinton v. O'Conner, et al., No. 7:2014cv00197 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/10/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ERK' OFFI U.S. ST. URT S CE DI O AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E U NI N TED STATES DISTRI T C O UR T C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANO KE DI SI VI ON D O N A LD LEE H I TO N , N Pl ntff ai i , O ' N N ER ,e aI, CO t . Dee n t) fnda ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JLN 12 2 1 29 JULA . I BY: . D cu z èi l to No. :4 c 0 1 7 viAc in 7 1 -v- 0 9 M EM O M N DU M O PI I N ON By: M i hae F.Urbans d c l l U ni ed St D i t ctJudge t ates s ri Donad Le Hi on,pr ee ngpr K ,fld a cvi rght co pl nt ptr ua t 42 l e nt oc di o ie i l i s m ai , ls nt o U. C.j1983.ByOr re eedonAprl24,201 t c tdie tdpl ntf t rt t t S. de ntr i 4,he our rce ai if o eum o he c t saeme ofa s t,a e c e ve ii d sae e f m a a i m a ea ot f m , our a t t nt s e s n xe ut d rte tt m nt or nd n n t cc mt or wih ac ri c ofpl i ifst s f ac ountsatm e f t sx- o h pe i t e tied opy antf nzt und c t e nt or he i m nt rod i me ael pr ce ngt flng oft c m di t y e di he ii he ompli ,obt ne fom t a o it prs ofk i l ant ai d ' he ppr pra e ion t a r ofe ch prs a w hi h pl ntf i orwasco i dt i t ts x- ont pe i w ihi 1 da a i on t c ai if s ntned l ng ha i m h rod t n 0 ys r f om t da e oft Or r Pl i i ff l a s a e e ofa s t a a e c e ve ii d r he t he de . a ntf ied t t m nt s e s nd n xe ut d r te sa e e f m, tpl ntf f ie t i l a i ae a co mtf m a r quie sx- ont t t m nt or bu ai if a ld o ncude n nm t c t or nd e r d i m h sa e e .Pl ntf fl am o i f e e i oftmet fl t r uie i t a ountf m t t m nt ai if ied ton or xt nson i o ie he eq r d nma e cc or a sx- ont s a e e son M a 5,201 By a s ond c tona l fl d Or re e e on M a nd i m h t t m nt y 4. ec ondii ly ie de nt r d y 6,201 t c tg a ed pl ntf 20da fom t daeoft Or rt c 4,he our r nt ai if ys r he t he de o ompl wiht y t he de i i i .Pl i ifwa a s d t ta f itr t c fcences antf s dvie ha alte o ompl woul r ul i dim is loft s y d es t n s s a hi a to wih u p eu ie cin t o t rj dc . M or t n 20 da ha e a ed,a pl ntf ha f ie t com pl w ih t des r be e ha ys ve l ps nd ai i f s a l d o y t he c i d c n iins Ac od n l t ec u t imis st ea to wi o t rj d c a srk st ec s o d t . c r i gy,h o r ds se h cin t u p eu ie nd ti e h a e o h f om t a tve doc toft c t Pl ntf m a r ie t cl i si a s pa a e a ton onc r he c i ke he our . ai i f y efl he a m n e r t c i e pl ntf i pr pa e t com pl w ih t not d c ai if s e r d o y t he e ondii ns to . K The Clr i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e or ndum Opi on a a ompa ng ek s rce o e opy hi m a ni nd cc nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf . E R:T i fO NTE hs dyo ln, 0 4 a f u e2 1 . / ./ u xm r .#.# .zz z ... Unie St t D it i tJ e t d a es s rc udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.