Mills v. Veterans Administration Hospital et al, No. 7:2014cv00183 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/25/14. (mka)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION VICKIE G. MILLS, Plaintiff v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00183 By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION Proceeding pro se, plaintiff Vickie G. Mills, filed the instant complaint. By order entered April 21, 2014, the court granted Mills leave to proceed in forma pauperis, due to her indigence. After reviewing the complaint, the court concludes that the action must be dismissed for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, district courts have a duty to screen initial filings and dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis at any time if the court determines that ¦the action ¦is frivolous or malicious ¦[or] fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted ¦ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii); see also Eriline Co. S.A. v. Johnson, 440 F.3d 648, 656 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations omitted) ( [Section] 1915 permits district courts to independently assess the merits of in forma pauperis complaints, and to exclude suits that have no arguable basis in law or fact. ). The court construes pro se complaints liberally, imposing less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-05 (1976)). However, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim of relief that is plausible on its face. Ashcroft 1 v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). Mills complaint fails to state a legal claim upon which relief may be granted. Mills allegations, set forth in an incoherent, stream-of-consciousness complaint, involve improper care of Mills mother during stays in nursing homes and hospitals, unhelpful or rude family members, neighborhood disturbances, and Mills son s incarceration. These allegations give no perceptible claim for federal relief. While the pleading rules are less stringent for pro se plaintiffs, Mills still must offer some foothold on which defendants could base an answer, or on which the court could base a judgment. Further, Mills has established no basis for federal jurisdiction. Generally, a case can be originally filed in a federal district court if there is federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or diversity of citizenship jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994) (citations omitted) ( [The federal courts] possess only that power authorized by [the United States] Constitution or a statute, which is not to be expanded by judicial decree. It is to be presumed that a cause lies outside this limited jurisdiction and the burden of establishing the contrary rests upon the party asserting jurisdiction. ) Accordingly, the court will dismiss Mills complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and the accompanying Order to plaintiff. Entered: April 25, 2014 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
