Obataiye-Allah v. Clark et al, No. 7:2014cv00159 - Document 78 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/17/2014. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
z. gtf..rj.9pjy. q )ggo .e,.g . x- ,. y2 o ., t : ' p : . a / ,7E <? k . ' 7, v ' ' I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A R O A NO K E DI I O N V SI U H U RU ' SEK O W O B ATM Y E - LLAH , A k. n , . . t . .' . , . t 7j<' .' t. J .fI1 'l ,. - J?j j,. . . - .r kuLp'k . k t . ' z w ,>. w., .. . . . k BY: DEP i CLERK CA SE N O .7: 14CV 001 59 Pl nt f , ai i f V. M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O HAROLD CLARK, AL , :I By: GlnE. nr d e Co a Chi U nied St e D i t i Judge ef t at s s r ct Defnda t) e nts. Th panif Uh nf k u Ob ti eAl h, a fld amoi nf rp ei nay ij n tv e litf, u se o aay - l h s i a e to o rlmi r nu cie r le a t mpo a y r tani or r alegi va i c pl nt aboutr ce e nt a Red ei f nd e r r esr i ng de , l ng rous om ai s e nt ve s t Oni n St t Prs Upon r vi w oft r cor t c tfndst tt moton mus be de e o ae ion. e e he e d, he our i ha he i t ni d. The c t c t es t pli ifs s ison a a m oton s e ng i eroc o y our onsnl he antf ubm s i s i e ki nt l ut r ij n tv rle dr ci u s cfe o fcas t ta fr te p an if a y fo wetm nu cie eif ie tng n pe iid fiil o rnse h litf wa r m se Vigni, a e o alg to so rtlain.I tro u o y ij n tv r le E yne e is et r i a b sd n l ai n f eaito ne lc tr nu cie eif i e ma v r su o p e e ta ij r o h r whih n te e temo ig p ry c ne d wa c usd b t ewrng r v n n nu y r a m c o v n h vn a t o tn s s a e y h o cli d i t undel ng acin. Ome W ord Trve v.TW A,111 F. 1 1 ( h Ci. ame n he ryi to ' ' ca l a l 3d 4, 6 4t r 1 97 ;nr M ir s f An i utLii , 3F.d51 , 2 (t Ci. 0 3 . 9 ) l e co o t t r s tg.33 3 7 5 6 4h r 2 0 ) t The pl n if does no al ge t t t po e i l ha m he s e t pr ve t o h a aitf t le ha he t nta r e ks o e nt k ug n i tro uo yij n to aie fo t ep s wr ng h h scame a ans t ed fn a t nn d ne lc tr nu cin rs s r m h a t o s e a li d g i t h e e d n s me i Cas No.7:4CV001 ba e on e nt i De e be 201 Ra he ,t pli ifalege a n e 1 59, s d ve s n c m r 3. t r he antf l s Obataiye-Allah v. Clark et al new s t of c ai s prm mi y a i tot r ofk i l w ho a e notpa tes t t s l s t c ai i e l m , i l ga ns he t a s r r i o hi aw ui, l m ng Doc. 78 t t i Augus a Se e r 201 t y de toye s e of hi l ga ma e il, r f e t ha , n t nd pt mbe 4, he sr d om s e l t ra s e us d o pr e shi gre oc s s ivanc ,i e f r d w ih hi out ng m al plce hi on srp c l sa us m a es nt re e t s goi i, a d m ti e l tt , de ve ba t ea sa i thi ,orr us t c r l hr t gans m ef ed o hangehi c a st a i saus i r t la i f rhi us s l s ik ton t t , n ea iton o s e Dockets.Justia.com oft g ivan pr es an hi purui oft sl ui. Be aus t pl i ifba eshi m o i he re ce oc s d s s t hi aws t c e he antf s s ton f i e l ut y r le on e iel ne c am s hi m o i mus be de e i t s pe ng c s or nt roc or e if ntr y w l i , s ton t ni d n hi ndi a e. Howeve ,t co twildie tt cer t fl t moton asane a s pa ae cvi a ton. An r he ur l r c he l k o ie he i w nd e r t i l c i a oprat or wilis t sda ppr i e der l s ue hi y. The Cl r i dieced t s nd c e oft s me or ndlm opi on a a compa ng e k s r t o e opi s hi m a l ni nd c nyi or rt pl i if de o a ntf . N ExTsR:Thi lN da ofocobe, 2014. s y t r Chi Unie Stt DititJ ef t d a es src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
