O'Conner v. Director, Department of Corrections of Virginia, No. 7:2014cv00128 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 04/18/2014. (kab)

Download PDF

@ FRTS OFFI U,.DI COURT CE S ST. AT ROANOKE, A V F 2ri ' R AFt2 1 2 1 , r 29 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON JO SEPH CLI O' NE CONNER, Petti i oner, V. DI RECTOR, Res pondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ' p J AC ULI LE. CLERK i ' , w BY; DE 'Y CLERK I ' Ci lAc i No.7: 4- vvi ton 1 c 00128 M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O By: H on.Jam e C .Tur s k Se orUnie St e Dit itJudge ni t d at s s r c J e ClneO' me ,aVigi ai m a epr ee ngpr K , ied apeii f wrtof os ph i Cor r r ni n t oc di o fl tton or i h b a c pu , t s a tt 28U. C.j2 5 a e s o spl u n o r S. 2 4.Peiin rc aln e t v ldt o hs t o e h le g s he aiiy f i t c n i me t rua tt t eFe r a y2 , 01 ,u g n o teCic tCo r o teCiyo o fne n pu s n o h b u r 3 2 2 j d me t f h rui u t f h t f Sae .Afe r viwi t pe ii t c tfndst ti s d be dimis d sl ma iy lm tr e e ng he tton, he our i ha t houl s s e lm rl ptrua tt Rul 4oft RulsGoveni j2254Cas . ts n o e he e r ng esl A fd r l o r ma n tg a t j2 5 h b a p tto u ls t p tto e e ha se te e ea c u t y o r n a 2 4 a e s eiin n e s he ei n r x u td h i r m e esa ia ei t c t oft sa ei whi peii ne wasconvit d.28U. C. e di va lbl n he ours he t t n ch tto r ce S. j2 5 49; r ie v Ro rg e , 1U. 4 5( 9 3 ; a t nv. mi 40 U. 5 ( 9 ) 2 4 1 P es r . d iu z 41 S. 7 1 7 ) Slv o S t 4 S. 3 1 71. h, The e usi r quie ti s tsi d by s e ng r vi oft cli i t hi tsaecour xha ton e r men s a ife e ki e ew he am n he ghes t t t wi u idcint c n ie t ecam.O' u l a v. ec e, 2 U. 8 8( 9 9 .I t rs ito o o sd r h li hj S li n Bo rk l5 6 S. 3 1 9 ) n v Vigi a anon- ah r w convitc n e us sa er m e esi oneoft e wa ,de nd ng on r ni , de t o c a xha t t t e di n hr e ys pe i t naur oft cli r ied.Fis, hecon c c n fl adie ta he t e he a ms a s rtt vit a ie r c ppea t t Vigi a Cour of l o he r ni t Appe l wih as e nta alt t Su e eCour ofVigi ai t Co tofAppeasr es a s t ubs que ppe o he pr m t r ni f he ur l ul a ns t c c .VA. gai t he onvit CODEj 1 1411 Sec t c c ca atc t con ci 7.- . ond,he onvit n ta k he viton c lt r ly by flng asa ehabe pe ii wih t cr ui cour whe et co c was ola e a l ii tt as tton t he ic t t r he nvit c ceda t a alng a a s de iin t t Supr meCo tofVigi a l j8. onvit nd hen ppe i n dvere cso o he e ur r ni. d. 01 1A peii ma bedimis dpl s ntt Rul 4 i i i ce fom t pettont tapeiine i note ildt tton y s s e z ua o e f t s lar r he ii ha r tto r s ntte o ri . elef 65 A)1 ; Sup. . 5: a .Fi l t c c c e us rme e bytlngasae 4( ( ) Va. CtR. 9() naly,he onvit an xha t e dis ii tt h b a p tto dr cl wihteS p e Co r o Vig na VA. a e s ei n ie ty t h u rme u t f r i i. CODE j8016 4 A) 1. i . - 5 ( () W hihe rr e i t ke t con c uli t l m us pr s ntt c am st t Supr m eCour of c ve out s a n, he vit tma ey t e e he l i o he e t Vigi a a r c vea r i fom t tc t f ea f r diti tco tc n c i rt r ni nd e ei ulng r ha our be or ede al src ur a onsde he cli s A f r lha aspe ii rhasnote use saer medisi t pe ii rhast am . ede a be ttone xha t d t t e e f he ttone he rg unde sa e1 w t r ie t quesi pr e e by a aval bl pr e ea f ist do s i ht r tt a o a s he ton es nt d ny ia e oc dur nd a l o o. 28U. C. 2 5 /) S. j 2 4 . Thepe ii cea l s tton l ry howst tPe ii rhasnotpr s t d cli st t Supr meCour ha ttone e en e am o he e t ofVigi a.2 Pettone ' f iur t exha tsa er m e esm a t ssl ma y dim is oft r ni ii rs a l e o us tt e di nda e 'm r s s al he pe ii .3 Based upon t fndi t tPeii rha no madet r uiies t n i ls tton he i ng ha ttone s t he eq st ubsa ta howi ng o d na o ac nsi to a rg ta rq ie b 28U. C. 2 5 /) ac riiaeo f e il f o tt in l ih s e u rd y u S. j 2 3 , e t c t f f a a a lt i de e ppe l biiy s ni d. . E E T i ! dyo A r,04 NT R: hs ( a f pi 2 1. l # Se or ni t d St t Diti t dge e aes src 2Pe ii ra ttone cknowldg t thi saeha spetton i silpendi wih t Cic tCour f t CiyofSaem . e es ha s tt bea ii s tl ng t he r ui t or he t l 3 Pe ii rm a r ie hi f der ha a pe ii i he uns es uly pr ent t c a m st t Supr Cour of ttone y efl s e al be s tton f ucc sf l es s he l i o he eme t Vigi at oughoneoft t e r t sdes rbed.Peii ri a s howeve ,ha hi tmet fl saea r ni hr he hr e ou e ci ttone s dvied, r t t s i o ie tt nd fd rl a e sp tin i l td S e28U. C. 2 4 () VA. E j8016 4( ( ) Th c u tmdst e ea h b a eio s s i e . e t mi S. j 2 4d ; COD . -5 A)2. e o r f he sa ng t cas i no ne s a ybec us i a r Peiine ale dy be isfom t t lngpr son of28 tyi he e s t ce s r a e t ppeas tto r r a nett r he oli ovii U. C.j2 4 ( )2) S e e2,t ie v We r 5 4U.. 6 (0 5 . S. 2 4 d( . e . ..lhn s . be, 4 S 2 9 2 0 ) 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.