Kidd v. Lynchburg Adult Detention Center, No. 7:2014cv00094 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 04/18/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
r CE 'l pQr: OFFI U,S. sT Cour Dl . AT RCANOK ,VA I E fl ) . -LE( AP t2 z l ' F gj I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STR I C OU R T CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI T O F V I I I C RG N A RO AN O K E D I SI N VI O M I H A EL W A Y NE K I , C DD Pl ntf , ai if V. LYNCHBURG ADULT DETENTI ON CENTER oe dn. kn a t ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JULA C. L CL I EY, ERK BK i ' DEP CL ERK C i lA c i No.7: 4- vvi ton 1 c 00094 M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O By: H on. m esC .Tur Ja k Se or Uni e St e Di t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c M iha lW a Ki aVigi ai aepr e ng pr K ,fl d aci lrght Compl i c e yne dd, r ni nm t oc edi o ie vi i s ant p ru n t 4 U. C. 1 8 .P an ifn me t eLy c b r Ad l Dee to Ce tr(çal)a u s a t o 2 S. j 9 3 litf n s h n h u g ut tn in n e C i' s J ' t s edef nda a c pl nsa he ol e nt nd om ai boutt c tonsofc i he ondii onfneme a me a - at nt nd nt 1he 1h te t e a t J i. Thi m a tri be or t c tf rs r e ng, ls ntt 28U . C. r am nt t he al s te s f e he our o c e ni ptr ua o S. j 1 5 Afe r e ngpli ifss si ,hec tdimis st Compli wihout 91 A. tr eviwi antf' ubmisons t our s se he ant t p eu iea fio o . rj dc s 'v lus r Thec t us dimi sa aci orcai fld by a i t i t co tdeer nest t our m t s s ny ton l m ie n nma e f he ur t mi ha t a ton orcli i fi ouso f ist saea cai on whi r le may begr nt d. See28 he c i am s rvol r al o tt l m ch ei f a e U. C. j1 5 e( ) 1 5 b () 4 U. C. 1 9 ec.Thefrtsa d r icud scams S. j 91 ()2 , 91 A( )1; 2 S. j 9 7 () is tn a d n l e li bas upon t n i s t bl me il sl lt or 'Ecai ofi rnge ed t ndipu a y rtes ega he y,'çl ms nfi mentofal ga it r t a e l n e es whi h cea l doesnote s 'orc am swhe et ç a t c e i ar cla l ba ees .' c l ry xit' l i r he l cual ont ntons e e ry s l s' f Netkev W iln , 9 U. 31 , 27( 9 9 .Alh u ht ec u ti rl c n t e p oî iz . l ms 4 0 S. 9 3 1 8 ) t o g h o r l al o snls r t i be y c mp an s Han sv Ke n r 4 4U. 5 9 5 0 21( 9 2 ,hec u t o sno a ta a imae s o lit, i e . r e, 0 S. 1 , 2 - 1 7 ) t o r d e t c s n n t' a dvoc t ,s s e de o ng s a ut y a co tt i a e ua pont vel pi t t or nd ns iutonalc ai snotc e l r i e i a lm l ary a s d n c ant Se Br kv.Car l 107F. 241 243( h Ci.1 ( tg,J.c uri ) ompli . e oc rol, 3d , 4t r 997) Luti , onc rng ; Be u et Ci o Hn t n 7 5F.d 1 4,1 8( t Ci.1 8 ) s eas God nv. e e a d tv. t f mp o , 7 2 27 27 4h r 9 5 ; e lo r o Le k , y

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.