Hopkins v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2014cv00087 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 04/18/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
Bas upo t al ge f t ,Pli tf ss c iy cas ik a i a i e -ac lt ta f ed n he le d ac s a n if e urt l st ton nd ntr f iiy r nser doesno e e a s nt nc i s h a e r m ewa a t gi rs t t pr t c i oft Due t xce d e e e n uc n xte y s o ve ie o he o e ton he Pr s Clus byisownf c SeeBe r tv.Smih,1 F. 5 503( hCi.1 oce s a e t ore. ve ai t 20 3d 00, 4t r 997) ( di t ta nitai s grgainf rsxmonhswihve mi hlma wat toode hol ng ha dmi sr tve e e to o i t t r n; l n se;l d t l t unbe r bl he ;c d f oie ; a a e at ol ood;dit cl hi lne , ndbeddi ,l rpe i i c l no ry ot ng, i ns a ng' onge rods n el; out i r cr a i no e a i orr lgi s r i s a l sf wasnots a y c la t sde e e ton; duc tonal e i ous e vce ; nd es ood o t pia s o i esg fc hads p) Nordoesa i r s i Pl ntf sscliycls ikai c tt e mpos iniiant r hi . n ncea e n ai if e trt a st ton onsiut a ç t ca a sg fca 'ha ds p i r a i t t or na y i i nt ofprs lf be us n t ypi l nd i nii nt' r hi n elton o he di r nc de s a ion ie ca e Pl i ifhasno c tt i lrg t r ma n i a c r t d i apa tc a prs ort behed i a antf onsiutona iht o e i nc r e a e n riul r ion o l n s e i s cliyca sfc to S eMo d v. g et 4 9U. 7 , 8n9( 9 6 (ee t a p ct e t t lsii ain. e o y Da g t 2 S. 8 8 . 1 7 ) rj ci k r ng prs rsa gume t tapendi wa r nta de anera r e y a f c e hi prs ione ' r nt ha ng ra nd t i dve s l fe t d s ion cas ii a i a qua ii a i f i tm tona pr nmsbe a e no e y sae a ton c ryi l sfc ton nd lfc ton or nsi i l ogr c us t ver t t c i a r ng a v rec ns q e c sf rp io i mae a tmaial a tv tsad ep o e srg t.Eve i d es o e u n e o rs n n ts uo tc ly ciae u r c s ih) nf VDOC ofi i l vi aed VDOC pr e esby i tt i Pli ifstanser ac am t tprs n fc a s ol t oc dur nsiutng a ntf r f , l i ha io ofi a sha no f l d t rown i pe n polc e orpr e esa s do notsae a tcil ve t olowe hei nde nde t ii s oc dur l o es tt c tt ina cli .Se Unie Sttsv.Ca e e ,440U. 741 752- ( 978 ;tc ov.Cnt onsiuto l am e td ae crs S. , 55 1 ) lici y. ofFaifx. ,907F. 1 9,1 ( hCi.1 ( di t ti sae1 grnt mor ra Va. 2d 45 469 4t r 990) hol ng ha f tt aw a s e pr e a rg st n t Consiu i n r quies asa e' f iur t abi by t t1 w i no a oc dur l i ht ha he tt to e r , tt s a l e o de ha a s t fd r l u p o e sis ) Ac o dngy teCo lit sd s s e wih u p eu ief rfiig e e a d e r c s sue. c r i l ,h mpan i imis d t o t rj dc o aln t sa ea c am upon whi h r le m a begr t d. o tt l i c e if y an e ENTER:Ths / i d yof rl2 4 a Api, 01 . t Se o ni u nie Stt DititJ td a es src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.