Robles v. Sturdinvant et al, No. 7:2014cv00070 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/27/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
CUERK' oFfp u,s, em eour S ice ol AT DANVI E,V LL A FI I TH E U N I N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI O SCA R R O BLES, Pl nt f , ai if V. LT.STURDI NVANT,e aI, t . Def endant s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MA2 21 2 J UL :Y; Ex r sRx u ' . D U cl - Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00070 vi t on 14- vM EM O R AND U M O PI I N N O By: H on. ls L.K i er Jac t on s Se or U ni e St esD i t i tJudge ni t d at s rc Os rRobl ,aVigi ai t pr ee ngpr K ,ie a cvi rght Compli ptrua ca es r ni nma e oc di o tld i l i s ant ts nt t 42U. C.j 1 o S. 983.Pli ifnn sa defnda sM r W hily,heSu rntnde oft antf me s e nt . te t pei e nt he Norhwetr AdulDee i Ce e Cia1';Ca anW ed ba a Lt Sur nva . t sen t tnton ntr J i' pti ) er um, nd . t di nt Pli ifalege t tDef nda sta f re Pl n ift t c t y oft Vigi aDe rm e a ntf l s ha e nt r ns e r d aitf o he usod he r ni pa t nt o Co rcins(i f re to ç VDOC' a trPlitf fldg iva c sa o t sr mo a fo t J i' wok ' fe an if i re n e b u hi e v l r m he als r ) e r eas pr am . el e ogr Ho v r imae ha en i e n e tc n ttto a rg t oap io j b, n a s c we e,n ts v o nd pe d n o si in l ih t rs n o a d s u h, u p io o fcasma g neal t r n t a imaefo apatc lrp io j bf ra yra o rs n fiil y e rly e miae n n t r m riua rs n o o n e s n wihou ofe ng f de alduepr s prncpl s Se e. ,Ali e v. de ik,5 F. 81 t t f ndi e r oce s i i e . es g. tz r Pa rc 69 2d 2 ( h Ci.1 ( r a sg nt a ege r l wihi t dicei oft prs n 4t r 978) wok sinme s r nealy t n he srton he io a mi srtr; lyv. g lne 9 2F. u p. 27 8 4( D. . 9 7 ( rs n rd dn th v d nitao ) Ale An eo , 6 S p 8 , 3 E. Va 1 9 ) p io e i o a e ap oe tditr s i c n iu de ly n) Bule v. i dS ae Bu e uo P io , 5 r tce n ee t n o tn e mpo me t; c r Unt tts r a f rs ns 6 e F.d4 , 0 51( t Ci.1 9 )(a ) Co ke v. u p v 88 F.d 1 8 1 21(t Ci. 9 9 3 8 5 - 5h r 9 5 s me ; a ly M r h , 4 2 21 , 2 9h r 1 8 ) (o dn ta imae h ven p oe tdp o ryitr s i c ni un i wo k rla ep o rm) h l ig h t n ts a o r tce r pet nee t n o tn ig n r -ee s r g a . Pl i if s i lgi lt t pm i i t i wor r ea e c ea l doesnotdepa tfom t e c ed a ntf ' ne i biiy o c pa e n k el s l ry r ' r he xpe t c tonsofc i me .See e. ,Sa nv.Conne,51 U. 472( 995) Be rt v.Smih, ondii onfne nt . g. ndi r 5 S. 1 , veai * t 1 F. 5 5 ( h Ci.1 .Pli ifalodoesnotha afdea rghtt us t J i' 20 3d 00, 02 4t r 997) antf s ve e rl i o e he als g i va pr ed es a c e re nce oc ur , nd ons quen l he c nnots e d o acai aboutar t la o y ty, a ucc e n l m e a it r ta frf flnggre nce .Se e. ,Ada v.m c ,40F. 7 7 75(t Ci.19 . rnse or ii iva s e. c. ms e 3d 2, 4- 4h r 94) Am. , Ci lLi ri Uni v. i mioCnt ,999F. 78 78 ( h Ci.1 .Acc di y, vi be tes on W co c v. 2d 0, 5 4t r 993) or ngl I ds s t ea to wih u p eu ief rfiigt saeacam u o whc r le ma b g a td. imis h cin t o t rj dc o aln o tt li p n ih eif y e r ne E NTER: hs'V! dyo Mac,04 T iv f a f rh2 1. Se rUnied St t D1 it udge ni t aes s c 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.