Wells v. Mirrett, No. 7:2014cv00048 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 02/11/2014. (kab)

Download PDF

* * Å : OFFI U. DI O URT CE S. SX AT BOANOKE, VA 2) ;. :t :7 'A Ãª @ I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E D I SI N VI O LESTER C.W ELL S, FE 1 12 1 B 24 J A C. ULt BK DEP 'Y. ERK - CL CLERK C A SE N O .7: 4C V 0004 1 8 Pl ntf , ai i f V. M E M O R AN D U M O PI I N N O JUSTI M I N RRETT, By: Jam esC.Tur k Se or Unied St esD i t i Judge ni t at s r ct D efendant . Lese C. W els a Vigi a i t pr e ng pr K , fl t s cvi rg s a ton tr l, r ni nma e oce di o ied hi i l i ht c i purua t 42 U. C. j1 s nt o S. 983. W el s s J tn M irt,algi t t whie W els was ls ue usi re' le ng ha t l l ic r eae a t eDa v leCi J i i Ap i o 2 3 s me n kc e a b o ePlitf sjw n ac rtd t h n il t al n rl f 01 , o o e ik d nd r k an if a y i t pl e . Upon rviw of t r or t c tfnds t he j1 a ton mus be n wo ac s e e he ec d, he our i hatt 983 ci t sl rl d s s e wi o t rj d c . tmmai imis d t u p eu ie y h The c t i r r t di m i s a ac i n or c a m tl d by a pr s r a i t a our s equied o s s ny t o l i ie i one ga ns gove n e ale iy orofk e i t cour dee mi t a ton o cli i fi ous m ai i , r m nt ntt t r f he t tr nes he c i r am s rvol , lcous o fist saeacam o wh c rle ma beg a td 2 U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) I o d rt r al o tt li n ih eif y rn e . 8 S. 91 A( )1 . n r e o sae acam i a y f d r lcv la to ,tep an ifsÃ§ta t a alg to mus bee o g t tt li n n e ea ii ci n h litf Ã§ l cu l le ains t n u h o g r s a rghtt r lefa ve t s c ai l ve ,'t one t ti Ã» a i e on is f ce' r t r aie i o ei bo he pe ul tve e l' o ha s t usbl pl t a ,' a he t meel tc eva e.'BelAt.Co . Twombl 55 U. 5 570( ) han r y sonc i bl ' l l p v. y, 0 S. 44, 2007 . To sae a ca e of a ton unde j1 a pli if mus esa ih t t he ha be n tt us ci r 983, antf t tbls ha s e d p i e ofrg t g rn e d b te Co si to o lws o t Untd Sae a t a ti e rv d ih s uaa te y h n tt in r a f he ie tts nd h t i s u de i ton r s t d f om cond tc m it d by a pe s ac i unde col of s a e l w . W e t pr va i e ule r uc om te r on tng r or t t a s v.At ns 48 U. 42 ( 988) The pli ifmus de ki , 7 S. 1 . antf t monsrt t tt c tae ha he onduc ca i t t usng he a l ged cons iutonal vi a i n i tf ry a ti a e t t St t ,'s as t qualf a l c i le tt i ol to s tail trbut bl o he a e ' o o iy s Ã§ tng a t rcol ofsaelw'(lokno a Ã§sat a to ). Luz rv.Edmons Oi Co.457U. mde or tt a ' as wn s Ã§t e cin' a on 1 , S. 9 2,9 7 ( 98 ) P an ifmus sae fcss o n t a hi alg d ij r wa c usd t y a 2 3 1 2 . litf t tt a t h wig h t s l e nu y s a e i e b per o f who t St t i r ponsbl 's one ' s n or m he a e s es i e,' ome i may f il bes i t be asa ea t ' who ary ad o t t c or' - a sa e e oye ors one who t sace t t rwih o ha obt i sgniia ad fom t t mpl e ome s ha td ogehe t r s aned i fc nt i r sae ofki l,' s t t f a s'or omeonewhos C nduc i ot r s c r ea et t St t ' I eÃ§ co t s he wie ha g bl o he ae. d. ' W el fist sae fcsd mo srtn t tt e p ro wh alg dy b o e h sj w i ls al o tt a t e n tai g ha h es n o le e l r k i a n Ap i o 20 3 wa Ã§ cig u d rc lro sae lw' s a t b s be tt s tt e j 1 8 . rl f 1 s i tn n e oo f tt a ' o s o e u j c o ui md r 9 3 a W el d e n talg t tte d fn a ti aj i e o e ,ta h o tie sg t n ad o ls o s o le e ha h ee d n s al mply e h t e ban d ini t i r ka a tdj itywihsaeo tcas o ta hi c n u ti,n a ywa ,atiu a l t t esaewhe ce on l t tt f il, r h t s o d c s i n y t b tbe o h tt i r n a u d n iidp ro b o eW el' a Be a s W el tusf ist alg f css p o t te n nie tfe e s n r k ls jw. c u e ls h al o l e a t u p ri h e ng ttt a tr'ee n o hi p r re j1 8 cam,ta cam mus be s mmaiy d s se i ae co ' lme t f s u po td 9 3 li h t li s t u rl imisd wih u p eu ie p rua tt j1 5 b ( ) a lg l fio o . An a p o rae o d rwi t o t rj dc , u s n o 91 A( )1, s e al rv lus y p r p it r e l l i s t s da s ue hi y. ENTER:Ths / d yo F bray 2 4 i / a f e u r, 01 . SÃ© erunie St t sDiti tJ d hi t d a e src ge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.