Griffin v. Stidham et al, No. 7:2014cv00032 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/18/2014. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL : oFFl u. nl ,tour ERK' ce :. sr J M NVI E, Lk VA o I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FO R TH E W ESTE RN DI STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI ' K EENEN D.GRI N, FFI Pl ntf , ai i f V. C/ STI O DHAM ,eta . 1, Dee fndants. t) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) B1 k J ULI BK # c * Ci lA c i n N o. 7: c 00032 D vi t o 14- v- L M E M O M ND UM O PI I N N O By: Jac k on L.K i er ls s Seni U ni ed St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct Ke n D.Grfi pr ee ngpr K ,ie a cvi rght co ait purua t 42U . C. ene ifn, oc di o tld i l i s mpl n , s nt o S. j1 983.ByOr re eedJ nuay22,201 t c t rce pl ntf t s mi wihi 1 day de ntr a r 4,he our die td ai if o ub t t n 0 s f o t dae oft Or rasg d c oft c pli ,a sa e r m he t he de i ne opy he om ant tt mentofas e s a i t s t , n nma e ac c ountf onn,a ac rii d c ofpl ntf t u tf a ountsa e e tf t sxnd e tfe opy ai ifs r s und cc t t m n or he i mont h pe i i medit l pr ce ngt tlng oft c rod m a ey e di he si he ompli ,obti d fom t a opraeprs ant a ne r he ppr it ion ofk i lofea h prs a whih pl i ifi orwasconfne dtrngt tsx- ont pe i a wel t a c ion t c antf s i d li ha i m h rod s l a e c i a s itng ave ik ai f r a a a c pa ng doc nt ton s xe utng nd ubm ti rt ton o m nd ny c om nyi ume ai de o tai t tpli ifhaseihe e use t a lbl r me e a t e h c am sr i e m nsr tng ha antf t r xha td he vaia e e di s s o ac l i a s d it c n he ompli ,orpli ifm us docl e tt ts h r m e esdi no e s a t pr s ntpl c ant a ntf t lm n ha uc e di d t xit t he e e a e ofc i m e o we enota ia et pl ntf a t pr e tm e.Pli ifwa a s d t ta onfne nt r r val bl o ai if t he es nt i antf s dvie ha fi r t c mpywo l r s l i d s sa o t sa to wih u p eu ie al e o o l ud eut n imis l f hi cin t o t rj dc . u M or t n 20 da ha e a e a pl ntf ha f ie t c e ha ys ve l ps d, nd ai if s a ld o ompl wiht des rbe y t he c i d c n iin .Ac o dn y tec u t imis st a to wi u p eu iea dsrk stec s o dto s c r igl,h o r d s se he cin t t rj d c n tie h a e ho fom t a tvedocke oft c t Pli ifma r fl t cai si a s pa ae a ton onc r he c i t he our. antf y e ie he l m n e r t c i e pli tf i pr pa e t c a n if s e r d o ompl w ih t no e co tons y t he t d ndii . The Clr i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e o a ek s r ce o e opy hi m r ndum Opi on a a compan ng ni nd c yi Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if E E Ti ) NT R: hs dyoFbur,04 a feray21. xN g. : ( S n r i dSae DitcJd e ei Unt tts situ g e r .
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
