Brown et al v. Mathena et al, No. 7:2014cv00020 - Document 27 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Jacob X Peyton. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/10/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
't -'owc usp8;: izl s gl: ..I4e ue AT9AN lLK,V . k A I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI K ELV I E.BR O W N , N JA C O B X PEY TO N ,and M AL CO L M M U H A M M A D , q1 ô i k J c u s uu x By: Ci lA cton N o.7: 4- vvi i 1 c 00020 Pl nt f s, ai i f M EM O RANDUM O PI ON NI V. M N DA LL C .M A TH EN A ,e aI, t . By: Jaclson L .K i t ser Se orUnie St t sDit i tJudge ni t d a e sr c Defendant s. J c X Peyt pr e ngpr K ,oi l tldaci lrg sc antwihc pli if a ob on, oce di o j nty ie vi iht ompli t o- antfs pu s a tt 4 U.. j1 8 ByOr e e trdJ n ay 2 , 01 ,h c u t ie t dPe o t ru n o 2 SC. 9 3. d r n ee a u r 2 2 4 t e o r drce ytn o s i wihi 10daysfom t da eoft Or ra e c ed ve ii d sa e e tf m s ubm t t n r he t he de n xe ut rfe t t m n or ubmit ted wih ac ompa ng doc e ai n de t c nyi um nt to monsr tng t the e usedt a ia er m e esast ta i ha xha t he val bl e di o e ch oft cli sr ied i t c a he am a s n he ompli ,orPe on mus doc ntt ts h r medisdi not ant yt t ume ha uc e e d e s a t pr e pl ce ofc i m e orw e e nota ia e t Pe o a t pr s nttm e;a xi t t he es nt a ontne nt r va l bl o yt n t he e e i sa e ntofa s t;an i t ac ountr por, ac rii d c ofPe on' tus f a c mt t t me s es nma e c e t and e tfe opy yt s r t und c ot f t sx- ont pe i i m e a e y pr e ng t tlng oft c pl i ,o a ne f om t or he i m h rod m di t l ec di he i i he om a nt bt i d r he a opraeprs ofii lofea h prs n a whih Pe on i orwasc i dtrng t tsxppr i t ion fc a c io t c yt s onfned li ha i mont pe i Pe on wa a s d t ta f lzet co pl woul r ul i dim is oft s h rod. yt s dvie ha ailr o m y d es t n s s al hi a to wih u p eudc . cin t o t rj ie M or t 31da ha ea ed,a Peyt hasf l t c e han ys ve lps nd on aied o ompl wih t des rbed y t he c i c n t ns Ac o digy,h c u t imis sP yo scamswi o t eu iei t i c mp an o dio . c r n l t e o r ds se e tn' li i t u prj d c n h s o lit h a t r i t Pe on f om t s c e. Pe o m a r ie t cl i s i a s pa at a ton o e he nd e m na es yt r hi as yt n y efl he a m n e r e c i nc i pr pa e t c pl w ih t not d condii . s e r d o om y t he e tons nx ? The Clr i diec e t s nd a c oft sM e o a ek s r td o e opy hi m r ndum Opi on a a compa ng ni nd c nyi or t pl ntf . der o ai i r E E :Ti l =- dyo Yay21. NT R hs C a f r,04 ? . C c V irUntdSttsDititJ d e -' o ie ae src u g

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.