Brown et al v. Mathena et al, No. 7:2014cv00020 - Document 25 (W.D. Va. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Malcolm Muhammad Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/10/2014. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
e E K:X FO $6 DS C U L R ' I 1 IX O W AT M N u- VA . te, I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON K ELV I E.BR o w x , N JA coB x PEYTON,and M A LCO L M M U H A M M AD , ,. o , o M2! k A Ju BY: r o , # D V L E C i lActon N o. 1 c 00020 vi i 7: 4- v- M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O V. By: Jaclson L .K i k ser Seni Unied St es D itri Judge or t at s ct Dee f ndant . s M acol M uhn l m mmad, oc e ngpr K ,oi l fldacvi rght c antwihcopr e di o j nty ie i l i s ompli t pl ntfspurua t 42U. C.j 1 ai if s nt o S. 983.By Or e eedJ nuay22,201 t c t r ce der ntr a r 4,he our die td M uhn a t s i wihi 1 da fom t da eoft Or ra i ae a c mtr por, nd a mm d o ubm t t n 0 ys r he t he de n nm t c ot e ta c rii d c ofM thn mad' t s f a co f t sx- ont pe i i me ael e tfe opy l m s nzt und c unt or he i m h rod m di t y m e di t flng oft c ce ng he ii he ompl i ,obt ne fom t a opra eprs n ofi i lofea h prs ant ai d r he ppr it io fc a c ion a whih M uha a i orwa c i d durngt tsx- on h pe i On Fe u r 6, 4, t c mm d s s onfne i ha i m t rod. br a y 201 M uhn a s mm d ubmit a i ted n ncomplt i t a ountr por whih wa net rsgne by orfle e e nma e cc e t c s ihe i d ild outby t a o i t pr s of i a a die t d i t J nua y 22, 4 Or e .The co ts nt he ppr pr a e i on fci l s r c e n he a r 201 dr ur e M uha ma a he co tona l fl d or rgi ng hi t n da t core tt dei i nc e . m d not r ndii ly ie de vi m e ys o r c he tc e i s M uha ma wasa s d t taf l et c m d dvi e ha aiur o ompl woul r s ti dimi s loft sa ton wihout y d e ul n s s a hi c i t P eu ie rj d c . M or t n 20 da ha e a e a M uha ma ha f itdt c e ha ys vt l ps d, nd m d s al o ompl wih t de c i y t he s rbed c n iin .Ac o dngy tec u t imis sM u a d' camswi o tp eu iei t i o dto s c r i l ,h o r d s se h mma s li t u rj d c n hs h c pl i a t m i t s M uha m a f om t s c e. M uha m ad m a r ie t cl i si a om a nt nd er na e m d r hi as m y efl he a m n s pa a ea ton oncehe i pr pa edt c e rt ci s e r o ompl wih t notd c tons y t he e ondii . . - cus- ' Pl ntf s, ai if R AN DA LL C.M A TH E NA ,e aI, t . j r TheClr i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e or ndum Opi on a ac ompa ng e k s rce o e opy hi m a ni nd c nyi Or rt pli tf . de o a n if ENTER:Ths1 uc d yo i O . a , 4. 201 f # . . . e o Unied St t Diti tJ ni t aes src udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
