Pelletier v. Warden, No. 7:2013cv00599 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 01/31/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
a .*Š: oF:l t : :l - I ' e: / .r, e A R A d ïv T o s K ,l Flso L I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI RU SSELL AD AM PELLETI , ER J 3 1z l AN gj BJ u ca.,, cuYul ,s w, E A f ; , DEPU ' L ERK CA SE N O .7: 13CV 00599 Pet toner, ii V. M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O UN N AM E D W A R DEN , By: Jam e C . k s Tur Se or U ni e St t sD i t c Judge ni t d a e s ri t R espondent . Rus el Adn Pele ir a Vigi a i t pr ee ng pr K ,tl d t s a ton,whi he s l m lte , r ni nma e oc di o ie hi c i ch . syld asa M oton To Voi J m e Ba ed On Fr ud Upo The Cour. Pele i rstmoton' t e i d udg nt s a n t' ' lte ' l i ' r iesconsi i lc lnge t t va i t ofhi co i m e undert N ove as tmtona hale s o he ldiy s nfne nt he mber4,2002 j d me to t eLo s Co n yCic tCo r t e whc h sa d c n itdo c pia mu d r u g n f h uia u t rui u tmd r ih e tn s o v ce f a tl r e, r pe,a r l t fr r sc r s a s nt nce t t lf s nt nc ,pl fve ye r ,i prs a nd e aed iea m ha ge , nd e e d o wo ie e e es us i a s n ion. Spe ik a l Pe lte cai st tt pr e ut r t a ia e 'e de e d li ar z nt t t c t ly, le ir l m ha he os c o û brc t d' vi nc trng gtme s o he f c t Bas d on t natle ofPe lte ' c lnge t hi co i m e ,t c tc tu a our. e he tr le ir s hale o s nfne nt he our onsr ed nd doc tdhi s si asa peii f am 'tofha asc pus purua t 28U. C.j225 kee s ubmison tton or i be or , s nt o S. 4. Afe r viw oft pe ii a t c tsr or ,t c tc udest tt pe ii mus be tr e e he tton nd he our' ec ds he our oncl ha he tton t s ummarl dim is ass ce sve p ru n t 2 U. C. 2 4 49. iy s s ed uc s i , u s a t o 8 S. j 2 4 1 1 Cour r c ds i c t t tPeleirprvi l fl a j225 peiin c er ng t t e or ndiae ha lte e ousy ed 4 tto onc ni he s me c c i Ci lAc i No. 06CV00582.Thi c tadd e s d t peii on t m e is n onviton, vi ton 7: s our r s e he tton he rt a g a ed t moton t dimi s a t Unie Stt sCour ofAppe sf t Fourh Cic t nd r nt he i o s s , nd he t d a e t al or he t r ui dimi s d Pelte ' a s s e lei rs ppea . Thus Peletersc r ntpe ii i a s eq ntone,f li unde l , l i ' ure tton s ubs ue a lng r teprhiiini 28U. C. 2 4 b)a ans as c n o s c siepeiin. h o bto n S. j 2 4( g i t e o d r uc e sv t o t 1 Un e Rue4b o teRue Go enn j2 5 Cae ,h c u t y s mmai ds s a d r l () f h ls v r ig 2 4 s s te o r ma u rl imis y j22 peiin t ifipli y a pe r fo t epeiin a da atc de hi t t a t peil ri no 54 tto ç l t anl p a s r m h tto n ny ta he x bis h t he ttone s t l enttedt r i i t diti cour.' il o elef n he s rct t' Ptrua t j2244(9,afde a dititc t yco i ras ondors c svej2254 ls nt o 1 e r l src our ma nsde ec uc esi peii onl i peii tton y f ttoners ctr s s ik c rik ai n fom t Unie St t s Cour ofAppeas e le pect e tt to r he t d a e t l f rteFo rhCic i ta t camsi t p tto me tc ranc iei. j2 4 ( )3 .Be a s o h u t rut h t he li n he eiin e e ti rtra 2 4 b ( ) c u e Pel te doesnotde lei r monsr t t the hasobt i d s h ce tt a i by t Cour ofAppea s tae ha ane uc rik ton he t l, te c t twilds s te p tto wih u p eudc a s c e sv . Jn a p o rae o d r& l h ol l imis h eiin t o t rj ie s u c sie t p r p it r e Wl r e e tlsda ntr li y. The Cl r i die t d t s nd c es oft s me or ndum opi on a a ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi hi m a ni nd cc nyi or rt pe ii r de o ttone . E NTER:ThsZJ d yof a uay 201 i A a Jn r, 4. ' 2 nied St t sDitit t a e src e

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.