Dickens v. Department of Corrections/Patrick Henry Corrections Unit #28, No. 7:2013cv00579 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 01/03/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
R m Š8 Y FI U, Dl X URT CE S, 8X AT ROANOKE, VA Fà7%. ! T' I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROAN OK E DI SI VI ON JAM M I RAY DI ENS,SR. E CK , J û3 2 1 AN 2j JULI C. ) 'Y CL A C , ERK BY: DEP CL ERK CASE NO . 7: 3C V 0857 1 9 Pl i i f a nt f , M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI DEPARTM ENT OF CORRECTI ONS, c & , By:Gln E. nr d e Co a Chi fUnie St esDit i tJudge e t d at src Dee da ts. f n n t) J mm i Ra Di ke Sr, a Vigni i ae pr e di pr K , fld t s cvi rght a e y c ns . r i a nm t oc e ng o ie hi i l i s a to p ru n t 4 U. C.j1 8 . l h sa n e c mp an ,Dike salg st to o e ci n u s a t o 2 S. 9 3 n i me d d o lit c n le e ha n n occ son durnghi i a c r ton, wa de edt rgh t fe e r s ofhi r lgi be if . ai i s nc r e a i he s ni he i t o ' e xe cie r s ei ous le s Upon r vi oft r co d, hecou tfndst tt a ton mus be s e ew he e r t r i ha he c i t umm a iy dim is d. rl s s e Dike i i aceae a t Parc He yCoreci lUni 28(G t285 .Healege c ns s nc r rtd t he tik nr r tona t G uni ' ) l s t ti Augus of201 he wa f r e t wo k d i t Ei AlFir whih he i iis asa ha n t 3, s o c d o r urng he d- - t, c dentfe M usi Hol Da i vi a i of li r lgi bei f a prs pr edtr s Dike ' lm y y, n olton ls e i ous le s nd ion oc le . c ns s ubmisons i cae t thi gre nc on t sm a trwasdee d f s i ndi t ha s iva e hi te me ounded,a he r ceved an nd e i o fca a l g frt er r Dike ss e o l t eDe rme to Co r cin (t fiil poo y o he ro . c n u s n y h pat n f re to s L VDOC' a d ' n ) U ni 28,s ki a m one a y s tl m e . t ee ng t r e te nt Tosaeac us ofacin unde j1 pli ifmus etbls t theha bee de i tt a e to r 983, antf t sa ih ha s n prved ofrg sgua ante by t Unie Stt Consiu i orlwsa t tt s de i ton r s t d i ht r ed he t d a es tt ton a nd ha hi prva i e ule fom co uc c mitd by a pe s a tng t rc o ofsa e lw . W es v.At ns 48 U. r nd t om te r on c i mde ol r t t a t ki , 7 S. 42 ( 988) A compl ntfldby a i t c lengi t c 1 . ai ie n nmae hal ng he onduc ofanofie o e oye of t fc r r mpl e a g v mme tle tt ma b d s se u e 28 U. C.j 1 5 b ( ) i t e c mp an i o e na niy y e imisd nd r S. 91 A( ) 1 f h o lit s fi ous ma ii ,or f is t sa e a cam upon whih r le m a be g a t d. N et v. rvol , lc ous al o tt li c ei f y r ne izke I W il ms 49 U..31 ,3 7 ( 9 9 (i dn t tp e ius v rin o j 1 5 gv sj d e li , 0 S 9 2 1 8 ) fn ig ha rv o e so f 91 ie u g s n a t o iyt d s s acam b sdo a i d s u y meils lg lhe r ) u h rt o imis li a e n n n ip ubl rte s e a t o y . l i welstld t a a sae a d is a e ce c n o b s e u e j 1 8 W ilv. t s l e t h t tt n t g n is n n t e u d nd r 9 3. l e M ihg n De to S aePoie 491U. 5 , ( 9 9 CiNl i e aSaeno iso t asa tng c ia p' f tt lc , S. 8 71 1 8 ) g et r tt r t fkil ci h i t i ofii c pa ii ae 'ero 'unde j 1 3.) Bec us t VDOC and Uni 28 ae n her fcal a ctes r p s ns r 98 5 . a e he ' t r pr ry c i r d as a nc e oft Commonwe t of Vigi a,net roft s def nda s ope l onsde e ge i s he alh r ni ihe he e e nt c nb s dt e j 1 8 Be a et eVDOC a dUnt2 aeteo ydee d n st a Dik n a e ue md r 9 3. c us h n i 8 r h nl fn a t h t c e s n me i h s c mpan ,t i a to mu t b sl rl ds se wih u p eu ie t e a s n i o lit hs cin s e l mmaiy imisd t o t rj d c md r j1 5 b ( )a lg lyfi l u .Ana p o raeo d rwil ne t sd y 91 A()1 s e al rvoo s p r p it r e le tr hi a . TheClr i diecedt s nd c e oft sme o a l o ni a a co pa ng e k s r t o e opi s hi m r nddm pi on nd c m nyi or rt pl i if de o antf . ENTER: Thi s X W d yo Jn ay 2014. a f a u r, ChifUnie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.