Keystone v. Scarberry et al, No. 7:2013cv00572 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 2/11/2014. (kab)

Download PDF
I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI RI T CO U R T ST C FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI I A CT RG NI R O A N O K E D I SI N VI O FEB 1 2j 1 J i u. è kCL K UL> 'w $. ER BY; DEPU M N D ALL J.K EYSTO N E, LERK CA SE N O .7: 3CV 0057 1 2 Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM O M ND U M O PI I N N O P. SCARBERRY, & , c By:Ja sC. k me Tur Se or U nie St e D it i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Dee fndants. t) Ra lJ. ysone aVigni i t pr ee ng pr K , e t sc vi Hg sa ton ndal Ke t , r i a nma e oc di o sld hi i l ht c i purua t 42U. C.j1 ale ngt tprs ofii sa RedOni Stt Prs aenot s nt o S. 983, lgi ha ion fcal t on ae ion r pr di hi s t e f ovi ng m ufki nt ood,i vi ai n ofhi c tmtonalrght .Thec tfndst tt n ol to s onsi i i s our ha he a ton mus besl ma iy dim is asfi ous ci t lm rl s s ed rvol . Lie al c n tungKe tn ' c mpan , ealg st ef l wigcams ( )sn e b rly o sr i yso e s o lith l e h ol n li : 1 ic e o De e ntSc r r yt ove asFood Se vi Die t ra Red Oni Keysonehasnot f nda a be r ook r r ce r c o t on, t rc i ds fkin f o ()f o sr ied e n tsr ef i a r q rdt e teG se e eve u t e t o d;2 o d e vc o s o e v nl s e uie md r h l tr t ma me w'i v oaino Vign aDe m me to Cor ci n (VDOC' p lc ( )f o s r ie n 'n i lto f r ii p n f re to s ç ç ' o iy; 3 o d e vc ) o t c n i n sfo Ke tn ' me l ryG s o tetme'( )f o s r ied e n tsr e mi o dme t r m yso e s a ta t t f h i ' 4 o d evc o s o e v s mo ; b sui a dbmsa r q ie u e teVDOC < se me u' ( )f o s r c sr e imae ic t n t s e ur d nd r h s z tr n ' 5 o d evie e v s n t s ma ; Emp o e sz da o t ae c ode ' ( )f o s r ies r e E tre l wnk o ads'a d ç r p r ie nd u d td o l s' 6 o d e vc e v s t e ld do o li ' n i ; wa ; ( )f o s r ied e n t os we kl me u a r q ie S eCo l6, ,1 ,1 .Ke so 7 o d e vc o s o p t e y n s s e urd. e mp . 7 0 1 y tne cli st t a ar s toft s pr emswih f s r i ,hehass f r weghtl s am ha , s e ul he e obl t ood e vce ufe ed i os , he c , tpa i a ot rdic f rs noneofwhi h has1 d hi t s e m e c l ada hes consi ton, nd he s om o t, c e m o e k di a te t e .Hi c r am nt s ompl nta s ofe sno i c i t thehass ai lo f r ndiaton ha oughta me c e ua i oft dial val ton he

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.