Washington v. Clarke, No. 7:2013cv00526 - Document 34 (W.D. Va. 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 1/27/2014. (tvt)

Download PDF
GLERK O/FI U..DIT X Uc V CQ S S . AT ROANOKE, A V FI LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I RI O F VI G I A ST CT R NI R O A N O K E D I SI N VI O J 27 2 1 AN 21 J A . U L P20 * ULI EX BK UW CL JEFFREY FR A N K LI W A SH I G T O N , N N Pettoner, ii Ci lAct on N o.7: - 00526 vi i 13 cv- V. M EM ORANDUM O PI ON NI H A R O LD CLA R K E,e aI, t . R e ponde s s nt . By: H on.M i hae F.U r c l bans ki Unie St e Dit itJudge t d at s s rc J fr y Fr nkln W as ng on,aVigni i t pr e ng pr K ,fld ape ii f a e fe a i hi t r i a nma e oc edi o ie tton or wrt fh be sc r u , u s a t o2 U. C. 2 5 , h le i gt ec i n l u g n e tr d io a a o p s p ru n t 8 S. j 2 4 c alngn h rmia j d me t nee byt Cic tCour oft Ciy ofW i se f muli ef oni .Cour r or i caet t he r ui t he t nche t r or tpl el es t ec ds ndi t ha Peiin r r vo l fldaj2 5 peiina u tesmej d me ti W a hngo v tt e p e iusy ie o 2 4 t o bo t h n u g n n s i tn . t Ang ln , vlAcinNo. 0 -v- 0 3 ( . Va Au 9 2 0 ) us tec re t eiin eo e Cii to 7:0 c 0 6 0 W D. . g. , 0 0 .Th ,h u rn p tto i as b e u n o , al gt e t ep o i to i 2 U. C. 2 4 4 )a an t sc n o s u s q e t ne fli md r h r hbi n n 8 S. j 2 4 b g is a e o d r n i s c s ve pe ii n. Pur ua t t ss c i a f r ldit i tc t a consdera s c or uc es i tt o s nt o hi e ton, ede a s rc our m y i e ond s c sve j2254peii onl uponc riiai fom aUnie Sae Cour ofAppe l t t uc esi tton y e tfc ton r td tts t as ha cli i t s e a ms n he ubs quen pe ii me c ti c ie i Bec us Pe ii rhasnots t tton et eran rt ra. a e ttone ubmit any ted e de et thehasobt ned s h ce tfcai n by t Fourh Cicui Cour ofAppe s t c t vi nc ha ai uc rii to he t r t t al, he our d s se t p tto wih u p eu iea s c e sv a dd ne a mo t t in rsmoin imis s he ei n to t rj d c s u c sie n e is s o Pei o e ' to s i t f a t a f ra f r s a e cour r cor . Bas upon t fndi t tPe ii rha notm a a or r ns e nd o t t t e ds ed he i ng ha ttone s de s b tn ils o n o ad na o ac nsi to l ih a rq ie b 2 U. C. 2 5 () a u sa ta h wig f e il f o tt ina rg t s e ur d y 8 S. j 2 3 c, u ce ttc t ofa a a lt i de e rii a e ppe l biiy s ni d. ENTER:Ths 9i 3 d yo Jn ay 2 4 a f a u r, 01 . * * C' . . * U nied St esD i ti Judge t at sr ct X' Z

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.