Lonewolf v. Garrett et al, No. 7:2013cv00519 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/20/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK S OfFI EU.S. ST. J Ci DI GOURT AT ROANOKE,VA FI LED IN TH E U N I TED STA TES DISTRIC T C O UR T FO R T H E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E DI SI N VI O JO H N E.LO N EW O LF, Pl ntf ai if, ) ) ) V. ) ) ROCKBRI E REG I DG ONAL JAI e al, ) L, t . D ef endant s. ) NûV 2 12 1 23 JUL , UDL CLERK I EY BY: - UW CL EM Ci lAdi No.7:3-vvi on 1 c 00519 M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Hon. ihae F.Ur ns M c l ba ki Unie St t sDititJudge td a e src J m E. ol Lone ol,a V i g ni i a e pr ee ng pr K ,fl d a ci lrght a ton, w f r i a nm t oc di o ie vi i s c i purua t 42U. C.j 1 wihj idi i vese i 28U. C.j 1 a j 1 s nt o S. 983 t urs cton td n S. 331 nd 343.Pli if antf nnmesa dee n st Roc i Re onalJ i Cia1',J i Supe i e n J Hi ns J l s fnda t he kbrdge gi al J i' al rntnde t ohn ggi , ai ) S t Se Gart a df r rJ i imaeJ e Be j mi Co p r Pli tf ag st a g . tve re, n o me al n t o l n a n p e . anif rue h t De enda sa e la ef dama bec us Coppe a tc d Pl i ifi t J i a trSgtGa r t f nt r ibl or ges a e r ta ke antf n he al fe . re alege y a l dl nnou e t i a e t tPl i tf w a a c nc d o nm t s ha a n if s onvi t s x of e rf r pi a ni c ed e f nde or a ng ne- yea- d gr.Afe r viwi t Compli puruantt 28U. C.j 1 5A,hec tfndst t rol il tr e e ng he ant s o S. 91 t our i ha camsa an tteJ ia Co pe mus b ds s e wih u p eu ie li g is h al nd p r t e imis d t o t rj dc . Tosaeacam unde j1983, pli ifmus al Shevi ain o arghtscu e by tt li r a antf t lege t olto f i e r d t t Cons iuton a l w soft U nie St t s a m us s he tt i nd a he t d a e , nd t how t tt alege de i ton w a ha he l d prva i s commitdbyape s aci unde c orofsaelwv W es v. ki , U. 42,48( 988 . te ron tng r ol tt a ' ' t At ns 487 S. 1 ) TheJ i i nota( ron's jctt la lt vi j1 3, nd Pli ifdoe notdesrbea bass als t s ' ube o ibiiy a 98 a antf s pe ci ny i f t c t o c udet tCoppera t d unde col ofsae lw whe beai Pl n ifa t or he our t oncl ha ce r or t t a n tng aitf t he Se Unie Sttsv.Prce 383U. 787,79 (1 66)(e e td ae i, S. 4 9 rcogni ngaprvat pe s who zi i e ron j itye g g swi saeofcasi tec aln e a to a t u d rc lro lw frp r s s on l n a e t tt fiil n h h le g d cin cs n e oo f a o u po e h ofj1 ; c v.Ches pe keCo r Ct.788F.Supp.8 8 ( D. 1 ( i a 983) M cov a a r. r, 90, 94 E. Va. 992) notng j lca beaû ron'f pur esofj1 3) Ac r ngl Pli ifc nnotpr e i t s ai nnot k s ' or pos pe 98 . codi y, antf a oce d n hi a ton a i tt J la Cop r a t c a m saga ns t s de e nt a e di m i s w ihou c i ga ns he ai nd pe , nd he l i i t he e f nda s r s s ed t t p eu ie Plitf camsa ans S t Garta S p rn e d n Hign rmanp n i g rj d c . anifs li g i t g . re nd u eitn e t g is e i e d n be or t c t f e he our. ENTER:Ths Q D i d yo No e e, 01 . a f v mb r 2 3 4 / -2. A. &v, . . vŠs 4Unie Stt DitiiJ e t d a es src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.