Wells v. Mirrett, No. 7:2013cv00492 - Document 10 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 11/21/2013. (kab)

Download PDF

R = Å 8 OFFI U. . DI M URT CE S SI ATROANOKE, VA jIF( 't i. 2. 7 ' N0# 2 1 23 1 I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI R O AN O K E DI SI N VI O LE STER C . ELL S, W JULA C. . D , ERK CL BY; DEP CLERK C A SE N O .7: 3C V 0049 1 2 Pl ntf , ai if M EM O R AN D U M O PI O N M JUSTI M I RET T, N R By: Jam esC .Tur k Se or Unied St e D i t i tJudge ni t at s s r c D e endant f . Le t r C. W e l , a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr .K , fl t s cvi rght aci n se ls r ni nm t oce di o ied hi i l i s to plrln t 42 U. C. j1 3. W el s s J tn M irt,algi t t whie W el wa zslnt o S. 98 ls ue usi re t le ng ha l ls s ic r eae a t eDmwi eCi J i i Ap i o 2 2 ,h d fn a tE r bge jt ej ib r a d n ac rtd t h l t al n rl f 01 3 te ee d n t a b d h al a s n l y g kik d r m)i t ej m 'b e kn i i t plc s Up n rv e oft erc r , h c u tfn s c e hi n h a ' r a ig t n wo a e . o e iw h e o d t e o r i d t a t ej1 8 a to mu tb sl rl d s se wih u p eu ie h t h 9 3 cin s e l mma i imis d t o t rj dc . y The co t i r quied t dim is a aci or c am fl d by a prs r agans a ur s e r o s s ny ton l i ie i one i t gover nt le iy orofk e i t c tde e mi st a ton orcli i fi ous m ai i , nme a ntt t r f he our t r ne he c i a m s rvol , lcous o f i t saeacam o wh c rle ma beg a td 28U. C.j 1 5 b () l ode t r al o tt li n ih eif y r n e . s S. 91 A()1 . n r r o sae acam i a y f d r lcv la to t ep an ifsÃ§ta t a alg to mus b e o h t tt li n n e ea ii cin, h litf ll cu l le ains t e n ug o l r s a rg t r le a ve t s c ai l ve n t one t ti G a i e on isf ey r t r aie i ht o ei f bo he pe ul tve e l' o ' ha s l usbl pl t ac ' ahe ' t a meeyG o c ia l . Bel lCo v Two l 5 0U. 5 4 5 0( 0 7 . h n rl t n ev b e' lAt. p. . mby, 5 S. 4 , 7 2 0 ) c ' To sae a c us o a to u e 51 8 ,a plitf mus etb ih t a h ha b e tt a e f cin nd r 9 3 an if t sa ls h t e s e n de i of rg s gua a e by t Consiu i or lws of t Unie St t a t tt s prved i ht r nt ed he tt ton a he t d aes nd ha hi de i ton r ule fo c prva i es t d ' m onduc comm itd by a pe s a tng unde c orofsa e l r t te r on c i r ol tt aw. W es t v Ati ,48 U. 4 ( 9 8 .Th panifmus d mo tae t a t e c n u tc u ig t e . kns 7 S. 2 1 8 ) e litf t e nsr t h t h o d c a sn h a lged co tt i lvi a i i t ary ati a e t t St t ' s as t qua iy a Ã§ c i le nsiutona olton s t il trbutbl o he ae,' o f o lf s i tng a u d rc lro saelw' (lok o a Ã§tt a to ' Lu a v. mo s nOi Co.4 7U. n e o o f tt a ' as n wn s t ee cin). g r Ed n o 1 , 5 S. sk 9 2,9 7 ( 9 2 . Plitf mu ts e fcss wi t th salg d ij r wa c usd E y a 2 3 1 8 ) an if s lt a t ho ng ha i le e nu y s a e Ã» b pe s f whom t Stt i r s nsbl ' s e Gwho m a f ry be s i t be asa eacor' r on or he ae s e po i e, om one t ' y ail ad o tt t ' a sae e pl t t m oyee ors e who E s a t d t t rwih orha ob ai d sgnii a ad fom om one Ã§ ha c e oge he t s t ne i fc nt i r saeofi i s'ors tt fcaly' omeo whos l onduc i o he wiec r a et t St t ' 1 ne eÃ§ c t s t r s ha ge bl o he ae. d. ' W el fist sae fcsd mo taig ta t pes n who alg dy b o e h sj w i ls al o tt a t e nsrtn h t he ro le e l r k i a n Ap i o 2 3 wa G ci g t e c lro sae lw' s a t b s be tt s tu d r j1 8 rl f 01 s t tn md r oo f tt a ' o s o e u jc o ui n e 9 3. a W el d e n talg ta t ed fn a ti aj i e lye ,t a h o t ie s> iia tad o ls o s o le e h t h e e d n s al mp o e h t e b an d i fc n i r a td j ity wih sae o t as o t a h s c n u ti,i a y wa ,atiu a l t te sae ce on l t tt fkil, r h t i o d c s n n y trb tbe o h tt . Be aus W e l t f l t al ge f t s c e ls hus ais o le acs uppori t isae a t ' eeme ofhi pur re tng he tt t cor' l nt s po td j 1 8 cam, t a cam mu t b sl rl ds se wih u p eu c , pu s a t t 9 3 li h t li s e l mmai imis d t o t rj die ru n o y j 1 5 b ( ) a lg lyfio o . An a p o rat or wilis t sday 91 A()1, s e al rv lus1 p r p i e der l s ue hi . The Cl r i dieced t s nd c e oft s me or ndum o ni and a compa ng e k s r t o e opi s hi m a pi on c nyi or rt pl i if de o antf. E NTER:Ths ; / a o No e r2 3. i y f v mbe, 01 J Se ' Unie St t sDititJ e t d a e src u 1 The cour not t t W els alo f l t doc t es ha l s ais o ument as diect t t he exhaused avaiabl r ed, ha t l e , ad nitai r me e a t j lbeor flng t s lws t Se 42 U. C.j l e a (e ii mi srtve e dis t he ai f e ii hi a ui. e S. 997 ( ) r qurng p ion r t e us a ia erme e beo e fl fde a c ur a to . W el idiae o hi i ta rs e s o xha t valbl e dis fr ii e r l o t cin) ls n c t d n s niil ng compl ntt he di notfl any pievanc aboutt aleged ass ul. ai hat d ie es he l a t

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.