Whiting v. Tucker, No. 7:2013cv00466 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 10/10/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
ct sOFF6E U.B Ds W ERK' C .vAm l AT ROANOKE, FI LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOK E DI SI W ON ROGER DARNELL W HI NG, TI Pl ntf ai it V. I ATE M R.TUCKER, NM Def endant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 22T 12 2 1 23 JULA - ' I BK o E Ci lA d i N o.7: v00466 vi on 13c M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI By:Sam ue G . is l W l on Unie St t sDit c Judge t d a e srit Pl i t f Roge D a nel W hii a V igi a i a e pr e ngpr s brngst s c vi r g s a n if r r l tng, r ni nm t oce di o e, i hi i l i ht a to p ls n t 4 U. C.j 1 8 ,a an ta imae h n me o l a M r Tuc e . Up n cin trua t o 2 S. 9 3 g i s n n t e a s ny s . k r o c i a i of t Co pl nt t c tfnds W hii has f ie t sat a c ai o w hi h r le onsder ton he m ai , he our i tng a ld o t e l m n c ei f maybegrntdund 42 U. C.j 1 bec us t dee n i notape s a tngt rc o of a e er S. 983 a e he fnda t s ron ci mde olr saelw a d te eo e ds se W htn sCo lit t o tp eu ie tt a n ,h rf r , imis s iig' mpan wih u rj dc . Tosaeac u eo a to t e 4 U.. j 1 8 , plitf mu t l g f csi iaigh tt a s f cin md r 2 SC. 9 3 a anif s al e a t ndc tn e e hasbe n de i ofrg sgua a e by t Consiuton orlw soft Unie S a e a t tt s e prved i ht r nt ed he tt i a he t d t t s nd ha hi d p iainr s l dfo c n u tc mmitdb apes n a tn u d rc lro tt lw. W etv. e rv to e ut r m o d c o te y ro cig n e oo fsa e a e s At ns 4 7 U. 4 ( 9 8 (mph ssa d d . W htn h sa sre u itliil camst c u t ki , 8 S. 2 1 8 ) e a i d e ) iig a se td nn elgb e li he o r cn nnot dec phe . l i c ea , how e r W hii ha not a l ge M r Tuc r was a sa e ac or or i r ts l r ve , tng s le d . ke tt t a tng unde col ofsa el w. Norc t c tgl n a i or ton fo W hii sCom pli t ci r or t t a an he our ea ny nf ma i r m tng' an t s g e tt e s me Th r f r,t c u td s se W htn ' Co an ,wi o tp eu ie f r o u g s h n . e eo e he o r imis s iig s mplit t u rj d c , o h fiuet saeacam o whc rle ma b ga tdu d r28U. C. 1 5e()B)i . alr o tt li n ih eif y e rne n e S. j 91 ()2( i ) r .. ' .. EN TER : s 1 t da ofOc obe , 201 Thi 0 h y 3. t r .2 ' Uhfe stt DititJ -id aes src udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
