Uzzell v. Lee et al, No. 7:2013cv00453 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/20/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cÅ RK' OFFI t..(I GQURT s CE Js IST. ATK ANQV , VA I FIED L I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STRI T C O U RT C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI A R TH U R UZZELL, Pl nt f , ai i f ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V. JA C K LEE , aI, et . De e n t) fnda ts. N0V 2I 2 1 23 JUL BY; DL , W CLERK UW CL ERK Ci lA ct on N o.7: :vvi i 13- 00453 M EM O R AN DU M O PI O N NI By: M i hae F. rbans c l U ki Uni St es D i ri Judge ted at st ct Arhur Uzz l pr ee ng pr K , ie a c vi r g s c pl i , ts ntt 42 U . C . t el, oc di o f l d i l i ht om a nt ptr ua o S. j1 983.ByOr re ee Oco r1 201 t c tdie tdpli ift s twihi 1 da de ntrd tbe , 3,he our r ce antf o ubmi t n 0 ys fo t da eoft Or ra i ae a cou r por a ace tfe co ofpl i ifstu tfmd r m he t he de n nm t c nt e t nd rii d py antf r s t a co sa e tf t sxc unt t t men or he i mont pe i i h rod mmedit l pr e ng t flng oft c a ey ec di he ii he ompl i , ant obt ne fom t a o it prs ofi a ofe hprs n a whih pli ifi orwa c i ai d r he ppr pra e ion fcil ac io t c antf s s onfned durng t s x- o h pe i On Oc o r 1 201 pl n i fr t ne a i a e ac ot tr por i hat i m nt r od. t be 8, 3 ai tf e ur d n nm t c m e t howe r t mont ofM a c Aprl M a a J we enoti ude Thec ts ntpli if ve , he hs r h, i, y, nd une r ncl d. our e antf a he c tonaly f l d o de o Oc obe 21, 3 a s i at d t tpl i ifha 1 da t not r ondii l ie r r n t r 201 nd tpul e ha a ntf d 0 ys o c pl t a r tm lt i a e ac t r por f t r qui e m i s ng m on hs Pl i ifw a om e e nd e t he nm s co mt e t or he e r d s i t . a ntf s a v s dt a afiu et c mpl wo l r s tn ds sa o t i a to wi o t rj d c . d ie h t alr o o y u d euli imis l f hs cin t u p eu ie h M or t n 20 da ha elps d, ndpli tf hasf l t c e ha ys ve a e a a n if aied o ompl wih t de c i y t he s rbed c n iin .Ac o dngy tec u t imis st ea t nwi u p eu iea dsrk st c s o dto s c r i l ,h o r d s se h ci t t rj dc n tie he a e o ho fom t a tvedoc toft co t Pli ifm a r fl t cai si as pa a ea ton onc r he c i ke he ur . antf y e ie he l m n e r t c i e pl ntf i prpa e t c ai if s e r d o ompl wih t not c tons y t he ed ondii . The Clr i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e o a l Opi on a a compa ng ek s r ce o e opy hi m r ndlm ni nd c nyi Or rt pl i if de o a ntf . i ENTER:Th s &Y d y o No e e, 2013. a f v mb r 4/ U zmr .? ' -V n s V* ' Unied St t D i ti tJ t a es s r c udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
