Rodriguez v. Orange County Regional Jail, No. 7:2013cv00436 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/30/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
a - u oFFl s >:m- I L oEu v A R o d iv . -.; 1 T o x ,A ., FI LED I TH E U N I N TED STATE S D I STR I T C O U R T C FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F V I G I A CT R NI R O A NO K E D I I O N V SI L O U I R O D R I U EZ,JR . S G , Pl nt f , ai i f OM NGE COUNTY REGI ONAL JAI L, Dee fndants. t) 02 39 2 T 2 JULI C. A BK D ,GL IM l ERK ) Ci lAci No.7: c 80436 vi ton 13-v) ) M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI ) ) By: Gln E.Conrad e ) Ch e Un td S a e Dit itJ e if ie t t s src udg ) Loui Rodrgue ,J . pr ee ng pr K ,fl d a cvi rght co pl nt pur uan t 42 s i z r, oc di o ie i l i s m ai , s t o U. C. 1 3.Byo d r e trd S p e e 2 , 01 a dOco e 3 2 3 tec t'drce S. j 98 r e s n ee e tmb r 4 2 3 n tb r , 01 ,h out ie td pl n ift s i wihi 1 da fom t da eofea h or ra i t ac aitf o ubm t t n 0 ys r he t c de n nma e coun f m a a t or nd c rii c ofpl ntf st s f a ountsa e e t f t sxe tfed opy ai if nlt und cc tt m n s or he i mont perod i medit l h i m a ey pr c ng t flng oft c pl i ,o a ned f om e h pr s a whi h pl i ifi orw a e edi he i i he om a nt bt i r ac i on t c a ntf s s c n ie d rn ta p ro .Plitf rt r e tea c u tsae n f rt o emo t ( / 7 1 o fn d u ig h t e id an if eu n d h c o n ttme t o he n nh 4 1 / 3 t ough5/ 0 1 t thewa i a c rtda t Or Cot y f iiy.Howe , aitf ha hr 1 / 3) ha s nc r eae t he ange mt aclt verpl nif s notpr - d t a c mtsa e nt f t m o hst theha be n confned a t Rocki m ovi he c ot t t me s or he nt ha de s e i t he ngha f ciiy. Pli ifwa a s t taf itr t c a lt antf s dvied ha a lle o ompl woul r ul i dimi s loft saci y d es t n s s a hi ton wi o t eu ie t u prj d c . h Pli ifhasf ie t c antf a ld o ompl wih t de c i d c tonsbe us hehasno r t ne y t he s rbe ondii ca e t e ur d t er q ie a c l sae n s Ac o dn l t ec u t imisstea to wi u p eudc h e urd c omt ttme t. c r igy,h o r ds se h ci n t t rj ie ho a s rkest c e f om t a tve doc toft co t Pl i ifm ay r fl t c a m s i a nd t i he as r he c i ke he ur . a ntf e ie he l i n s r t a ton oncepl ntf i pr pa e t c pl wih t not c tons I t at m a i epa a e c i ai if s e r d o om y t he ed ondii . n he le tve, pl n ifm a t nde t e ieflng f e i t a o of$400. aitf y e r he ntr ii e n he m unt 00. The Cl r i die t t s nd aco oft sM e andum Opi o a a ompa ng e k s r ced o e py hi mor ni n nd cc nyi Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if ENTER:Th s 38* , d yofOco e , 01 i a t b r 2 3. Chi fU nie St t s D it i tJ e t d a e s rc udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.