Saunders v. Mondul et al, No. 7:2013cv00377 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/4/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
OFFI U. DI COUA CE S. SX AT ROANOTE, I VA FIEL L S I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COURT N TED S CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON D' NNTON A.SAUNDERS, QUI Pl ntf ai if, V. M O N DU L,ET A L, Dee da t) f n nts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) sE? 25 :)3 ' 1 JULI C. A BY: D 2' C E :' CL Ci lAc i No.7: 3-vvi ton 1 : 00377 M EM O R AN D UM O PI O N M By: G l n E.C onr e ad ChifUnied St e Dit i Judge e t at s s rd D' nnt A.Sa r,pr e ngpr K,tld acvi rg scompl nt ptrua t 42 Qui on unde s oc edi o ie i l iht ai , ls nt o U. C.j 1 S. 983. By or entr Augus 1 201 t co tdiecedplitf t s twihi der eed t 4, 3, he ur r t anif o ubmi t n 1 da fom t da e oft or rhi fna i i o ma i a ve iid sa e 0 ys ' r he t he de s i ncal nf r ton nd rfe t t ment. Pl i if s antf wa a v sd ta afit et c mp ywo l r s li ds s a o t sa to wi o tp eu c . s d ie h t alr o o l ud e utn imis l f hi cin t u rj die l h M or t n 1 da ha elps d,a pli if ha f l t c e ha 0 ys ve a e nd antf s aied o ompl wih t de c i d y t he s rbe condiins be us he ha not r t ne hi i t tus a c to ca e s e ur d s nma e r t c ount sa e e s a hi ve ii d tt m nt nd s rfe satm e wih a ompa ng doclme ai de onsr tng t the ha e t e nt t cc nyi l nt ton m tai ha s xhause ala ia e t d l va lbl rme is Ac o dn l t e c u tds se t e a t n wih u p eu ie a d srke t e c s e d e . c r igy, h o r imis s h ci t o t rj dc n ti s h a e o f om t a tve doc of t c t Pl i if m ay r f l t c a m s i a s pa a e a ton once r he c i ket he our . a ntf e ie he l i n e r t c i pli ifi pr par d t compl wih t no e c to . antf s e e o y t he t d ondii ns The Clr i die t d t s nd a co oft sM e or ndlm Opi o a a ompa ng ek s r ce o e py hi m a l ni n nd cc nyi Or rt pl i i f de o a ntf . EN TER: Thi s da ofSe e r 201 y pt mbe , 3. Chi Unied St es Di t ctJ ef t at sri udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
