Leverich v. Dudley et al, No. 7:2013cv00352 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/3/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFNI 0. DI f COUA S CE 3. S' . ATM NVILE, L VA I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI F r (gQ I l ). S FJUL BY: D C i lAc i No.7: 3- vvi t on 1 c 003 EP H UBERT LEVEW CH, Pl ntf , ai if 1 cL u ' E M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI V. By: Jaclson L .K i k ser Se or U nied St e D it i tJudge ni t at s s r c B . .D UD LEY ,etaI, K . De e nts. fnda t) Hube tLe rc pr ee ng pr K, ie acvi rght co ai , s ntt 42U. C.j r ve i h, oc di o fld i l i s mpl ntpurua o S. . 1 .By Or ren e ed J y 31 201 t c tdie t d pl ntf t s 983 de t r ul , 3, he our r c e ai if o ubmi wihi 1 da fom t t n 0 ys r t da eoft Or rasa e e ofas e s a i e a c mtf m,a ac rii d c o he t he de t t m nt s t , n nmat c ot or nd e tte opy f pli ifstu tfmd ac ountsa e ntf t sxantf r s t c t t me or he i mont pe i i h rod mmedit l pr e ngt tlng a ey ec di he ii oft c he ompli ,obt ne fo t a opraeprs n ofk i la whih pl i ifi orwa ant ai d r m he ppr it i o t a t c antf s s co i d dtrngt tsxntne li ha i mont pe i Pl i ifwasa vie t taf itr t co pl woul h rod. antf d s d ha alte o m y d r s l i d s sa o t sa o wi o t eu ie e ut n imis l f hi din t u prj d c . h M or t n 20 da ha e a e a pl i ifhasf l t c pl wih t des rbe e ha ys ve l ps d, nd antf aied o om y t he c i d c n i o .Ac o dn l t ec t t imis st a to wi u p eu iea dsrke t ec s o dt ns c r igy,h oz ds se he cin t t rj dc n ti s h a e i r ho fom t a tve doc toft c t antf may r fl t cai si as pa a ea i n onc r he c i ke he our.Pl i if e ie he l m n e r t cto e pl i ifi pr pa e t compl wih t notd co tons antf s e r d o y t he e ndii . The Clr i die t d t s nd aco oft sM e andum Opi o a a compa ng ek s rce o e py hi mor ni n nd c nyi O r rt pl i if de o a ntf . -r C ENTER:Thi k .fCI s -z M o da of y t 201 , 3. ' . Se orU nied St esD i t ctJ t at sri udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.