Hairston v. Warden, FCI Morgantown, No. 7:2013cv00328 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 08/08/2013. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
r pv s OFFI U,s, sT ; CE ATROANO DI . O URT I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O U RT C FO R TH E W EST ER N DI STRI T O F W R G I I C N A RO M O K E DI SI N VI O STEVEN O ' AL H A I ST O N , NE R KE, VA FI LED ALC 98 2 1 23 JUL BK C A SE N O .7: 36+ 00328 1 o nuE cu x sax PJ YCL K IT ER Pe ii tt oner , M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O V. W ARDEN,FCIM ORGANTOW N By: JamesC.Tur k Se or Unied St e D i t i tJudge ni t at s s r c R espondent . St ve O' e Ha rt af der li t pr ee ng wiho c ms ,ha fld am oton e n N a1 ison, e a nma e oc di t ut ot el s ie i t thesylsa at I I FOR W RI OF HABEAS CORPUS,'wli t co t ha t e s TETITION T ' lch he ur doc tdasapeiin fram i ofha asc pust r28U. C.j2241. Upo rviw oft kee tto o t be or mde S. ne e he rc r ,h c u t i st tli peiinmu tb d s se wih u p eu ie e o d t e o r fnd ha tl t o s e imisd t o t rj dc . s t Hart i i a c rtdi afde a prs i Ke uc Or na iy, j2241peii ison s nc r eae n e r l ion n nt ky. di rl a tton mus befl d i t Unied St t Diti tCour wher t de e n i co t ie n he t aes src t e he f nda t s nsne I r J s d. n e one , 2 6F.d3 8 3 2( t Ci. 0 0 .l hsp tto ho v r Hartna pe r dt b c aln i g 2 3 2 , 3 4h r 2 0 ) n i eiin, we e , iso p ae o e h le g n t ev l iyo t ej d me te tr db ti c u tc n itn a d sn e cngt edee d n o a h ai t f h u g n ne e y l s o r, o v ci g n e tn i h fn a t n d l f r lc i i lofe e.Se Unie Stt sv.Har t Cas No. 11 ede a rm na f ns e td ae ison, e 7: CR00082. By or r de entr J y 25,201 t c rt nsnz d Har t ss e ed ul 3, he ou co t e ison' ubmison asam oto t va t s tasde si i n o cae, e i o c re ts ne eu d r2 U. C. 2 5 a dg a tdHart n 1 d y t o j c t t s r o rc e tnc n e 8 S. j 25 , n r ne iso 0 a s o b e t o hi c t ci ort s taj2255motonsai hi camsa dic sngt i tmei s onsnlton o ubmi i ttng s li nd susi her i lne s Hairston v. Warden, FCI Morgantown Doc. 3 t e j2 5 ( l r s o et t ec u tso d r Hartnh sn w s mitda j2 5 mo in, md r 2 5 9. n e p ns o h o r' r e, iso a o ub te 2 5 to whi h ha be n doc t d i t c i na pr ee ng, eNo.7: 1 c s e ke e n he rmi l oc di Cas 1 CR00082.Asa1 f t r 1 urhe a tononHartn' cli wilocc i t tc e,t sacin unde j2241wilbedimis d ci iso s ams l ur n ha as hi to r l s se wi u p eudc .Ana p o raeo d rwilsueti d y. t t rj ie ho p r p it r e l is h s a Dockets.Justia.com The Clr i die t dt s nd c esoft smemor ndlm opi on a a ompa ng e k s r c e o e opi hi a l ni nd cc nyi or rt pe ii r de o ttone . ENTER:Thi s a ofAug t 2013. y us, S Unie Stt DititJ e t d a es src u
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
