Carroll v. W.R.S.P., No. 7:2013cv00275 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 07/09/2013. (kab)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U.S.DI S CE ST. COURT AT ROANO KE, VA FI LED I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON J 292 1 UL 93 J IC i ULA BY: DEP CHARLES ELLERSON CARROLL,IR. , Pl ntf , ai if V. W . . P. R S. , Dee nts. fnda t) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLERK . , CLERK C i lA c i N o.7: 3- vvi t on 1 c 00275 M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O By: G l E .C onrad en Chi fUnie St t sDit c Judge e t d a e srit Cha l sEle s Ca r l J .pr e di pr K , ied a c vi r g s c pl i ,pur ua t re l r on rol, r, oc e ng o f l i l i ht om a nt s nt o . 4 U. C. 1 8 .By Or e e tr dJ n 1 , 01 ,h c u t ie tdpli tf t s b twihn 2 S. j 9 3 d r nee u e 3 2 3 t e o r drce anif o u mi ti 1 da fom t da eoft Or rhi t s a countsa e e sf t sx0 ys r he t he de s nlt c tt m nt or he i mont pe i h rod i me ael pr ce ng t flng ofhi c m di t y e di he ii s ompli . Pli ifwa a s t taf itr t c ant antf s dvied ha a lze o ompl y wo l rs l i d s sa o t i a to wi u p eudc . ud e ut n imis l f hs cin t t rj ie ho M o et n 1 da ha e a e a pl i ifhasf ie t c r ha 0 ys ve l ps d, nd antf a ld o ompl wih t des rbe y t he c i d c tonsbe aus hehasnotrt ne t fnanc a docz e a i Ac di y, he c t ondii c e eur d he i i l lm ntton. cor ngl t our ds se tea to wi o t rj d c a d srk stec s fo t a tved c e o tec u t imiss h cin t u p eu ie n tie h a e ' m he ci o k t f h o r. h r Pli ifmay r fl t c am si as r t a ton oncepl ntf i pr pa edt c pl wih t antf e ie he l i n epa a e c i ai if s e r o om y t he not condii . ed tons The Clr i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e andum Opi on a a ompa ng ek s rce o e opy hi mor ni nd cc nyi Or rt pl i if de o antf. E ER:T i d' NT hs 5 / Carroll v. W.R.S.P. d yo Jl, 0 3 a fuy 2 1. Doc. 8 Chi Unied St esD i ti tJ ef t at sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
