Wallace v. State of Virginia, No. 7:2013cv00208 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/30/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
ck sOFRGL u. DI . ERK' s. sT cour AT M NVILE. L VA FI Yq 9 0 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STR I T CO UR T C FO R TH E W E STER N DI STRI T O F V I GI I C R N A R O A N O K E D I ISIO N V R I H AR D A . A LLA C E, C W Pett oner, ii J UL U RK E C i lA c i No.7: 3- v- 208 vi t on 1 c 00 C i lAc i No.7: 3- vvi t on 1 c 00218 M EM O R AN DU M O PI I N N O STATE OF VI NI RGI A, R espondent . By: Hon.Jac on L. ie ks K sr Seni U nied St es D i ri Judge or t at st ct Rih r A. la e pr c e igwi c u s lfldas l-t ldpeiin? rawrto c ad Walc , o e dn t o n e, ie efsye t o o h t i f h b a c r u , u s n t 2 U. C. 2 4,oc aln espaaeci n l u g n se tr d a e s o p s p rua t o 8 S. j 25 t h le g e rt rmia j d me t nee by t Cic tCour ofRus el Count a t Cic tCour ofW a hi on Count By Or r he r ui t s l y nd he r ui t s ngt y. de entr o M ay 8,201 t c t r c e t Clr t ope a d i t ha asaci n i c e e ed n 3, he our die t d he e k o n uplcae be to n as 7:3 c - 0 8 wh c wo l c le g t j dg n fo t eCic i Co r o W a hn o 1 -v 0 21 , ih ud haln e he u me t r m h rut u t f s igtn Co n y a ddr ce t a t ec aln et tej d me tfo t eCic tCo r o Ru s lCo n y u t , n ie td h t h h le g o h u g n ' m h rui u t f sel u t r woul pr ee i c s 7: 3- vd oc d n a e 1 c 00208.Thec ta s diece peii ne t i e a i fl an our lo r td tto r o, nt r la, ie ame peii i e c a tont ts tntal f l t fr j2254peii nn sa nded tton n a h ci ha ubsa ily olows he o m tton, me p o rrs nd n , ndc aln e o l o esaec u tsj d me t S eRue Go enng r pe epo e ta h l g s ny n tt o r' u g n . e ls v r i e S cin22 4 Cae 2() ( )() Thec u t d ie p t in rt a fi r t c mpywiht e e to 5 s s a, d -e . o r a v sd ei o e h t al e o o l t h t u M a 8, 3,Or rwihi t nt da wo d r s ti dim is oft a tonswihout y 201 de t n we y ys ul e ul n s s al he ci t P eu ie rj d c . M or t n t nt da ha ea ed,a pe ii rhasf l t c e ha we y ys ve lps nd ttone aied o ompl wih t s y t he e condii ns l t d,pe ii rtl d af m peii i e h a ton t tagan cha lngesbot to . nsea ttone ie or tton n ac c i ha i le h j d me t fo t eCic i Co r o RuselCo n ya dt Cic tCo r o W a hngo u g n s r m h r ut u t f s l u t n he rui u t f s i tn C o y. Due t pl ntf s f lle t c pl t t r s oft M a 8, unt o ai i f aitr o om y he e m he y 2013,Or r t co t de , he ur dimis t a tonswihoutprj c a srkest c esfom t aci doc toft c t s ses he ci t eudie nd ti he as r he tve ke he our. Pe ii rm a r fl t cli si ne s pa a eaci nsoncepe ii ri pr pa e t c ttone y e ie he am n w, e r t to ttone s e r d o ompl y wiht c tsOr ra t RulsGove ni j2254Cas . t he our' de nd he e r ng es TheCl r i diecedt s nd acopy oft sM e a ek s r t o e hi mor ndum Opi on a t a compa ng ni nd he c nyi Or rt pe ii ne a couns lofr cor de o tto r nd e e d. EN TER : Thi G- d yo Ma , 2013. a f y 3 Se orUnie St t sDititJ t d a e src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.