Hopkins v. Akers et al, No. 7:2013cv00049 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2013)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 3/19/2013. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT r mRK'AT ROANO.S.DI . COURT CT a s OFFI U CE ST FO R TH E W E STERN D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R NI KE, VA * FI LED ROANOKE DI I ON V SI MA2 1! 2 1 23 JO SEPH G M N T H O PK INS,JR . , Pl i i f a nt f , Ci l to No 71 -v0 j 2 c u uxcu x viAcin . :3c -0 j z . a u ua BE TTY A K ER S,e aI, t . By: M i chaelF.U rbanks i Uni e St e Di t i Judge t d at s s r ct BY : M EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI a PU CL RK R . E Defnda t) e nts. J e Gr ntHopki , r,pr e ng Dr K ,fl d aci lrght c os ph a ns J . oc edi o ie vi i s ompli ,pur u t ant s ant o 42U. C.j1 .ByOr re ee Fe u ' 11 201 t co tdiece pli ift s t S. 983 de ntrd br al , 3,he ur r td antf o ubmi y wihi 1 da fom t daeoft Or rr tun t sgne Co e t Fe f r . Pli ifwas t n 0 ys r he t he de e t' he i d ns nt o e o m antf a vs dt tafi r t c mpywo l r s l i d s sa o ti a to wih u p eu ie On d ie ha al e o o l ud e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t rj dc . u Fe ua y 1 201 t Clr sOfk e r c ve a lte fom pli ifsa i t thewoul s br r 3, 3 he e k' t e ei d e tr r antf t tng ha d oon be movi t Blnd Co r c i lCe e . Cl r sOfk er s ng o a r e tona ntr The e k' t e ponde on t s me daea d he a t nd saedt tt Cour doe notupda ea es esprort a i vi lbeng m o dbuta trhe t t ha he t s t ddr s i o n ndi dua i ve fe wasm o d,heco d wrt t Cour a sa et thei f c bee m o d. The Or rand ve ul ie he t nd t t ha n a t n ve de Cons ntt Fe f m we er t ne ast i a e o Fe ua y 1 201 The Cl r sOfk e e o e or r e ur d mdelver bl n br r 9, 3. e k' t confr imed wih t I t Loc t rt tt pl i ifha be n move t Blnd Fa m Co r to l t he nma e a o ha he antf d e d o a r reci na Ce er The O r ra Cons n t Fe f m w e e t n m aied o Fe ua y 1 201 t t ne nt . de nd e t o e or r he l n br r 9, 3 o he w plceofc i me a l ng t a tona da f rt pl i ift sgn a r blnt Co e a onfne nt lowi en ddii l ys o he antf o i nd e r he ns nt t Feef m . o or M oet n20(went da ha ea ed,a pl ntf ha fie t co ywiht r ha t y) ys ve lps nd ai if s ald o mpl t he d s rb dc n iin .Ac o dn l t ec u t imisstea to wih u p eu iea dsrk s e cie o dto s c r igy,h o r ds se h ci n t o t rj dc n tie t ca efom t a tve doc toft cour.Pl n ifm a r fl t c am si as pa a ea ton he s r he c i ke he t aitf y e ie he l i n e r t c i o epl i ifi pr pa e t c nc antf s e r d o ompl wiht not d c tons y t he e ondii . The Cl r i die t t s nd aco oft sM e andum Opi on andac m pa ng e k s r ced o e py hi mor ni co nyi Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if EN TER : Thi s V dyoMac,03 a f rh21. / J r ,x m r' . . Unie St t s D it i tJ t d a e s rc udge pe . #.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
