Dougherty v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al, No. 7:2012cv00549 - Document 21 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 05/09/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
* FFWQOFFI U % DI . UX e C; ST O - I TH E U NI N TED STATES DISTR I T C O U RT C FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I T O F W R G I I C N A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI R O BER T W .D O U G H ER TY , ë .. . ,. . A q A YQ,A ' ON V r yj yrn MAY 23 1 Jutl C. A Y, CLERK BK ' h DEP TY CL ERK -. CA SE N O .7: V 00549 12C Pl ntf , ai i f M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O V. C O M M O N W EA LTH O F VIR G INIA , c K , By:Gln E.Conr e ad C hi fU nied St e Di t i Judge e t at s s r ct De e f ndants. t) Rober W . a t D ughe t a V igi a i m a epr ee ng pr K ,f l d t s c vi rght ac i r y, r ni n t oc di o ie hi i l i s ton ptrua t 42U. C.j 1 Bypro me r ndlm opi ona or ,heco tsl rl zs nt o S. 983. ir mo a l ni nd dert ur lmmaiy d s se t ea to u e 2 U. C. 1 5 b ( ) fn i t a plitf alg to a d imis d h cin nd r 8 S. j 91 A( )1, idng h t an ifs le ains n s si fie t gi rs t a acinabl j 1 cli Pl ntf ha no move f ubmisons ald o ve ie o ny to e 983 am. ai if s w d or a ppoi m e ofcot s ,f l ve t fl a n ende c pl i ,a t a t rorn e t nt nt m el or ea o ie n m d om a nt nd o le m nd he j d me t Afe rve o plitf smo in a dter c r ,h c u t o cu e t a a1 h u g n . tr e iw f an if to s n h e o d te o r c n l d s h t 1t e m o i mus bede ed. tons t ni D oughe t f l t s a e a f c an orl ga r as t tt c tsopi on a or r r y ais o t t ny a fl l e l e on ha he our ' ni nd de s d be at r d orn e houl le e m nded. Si et c t e m i d Doughe t ss isonsdi not nc he our detr ne ry' ubm s i d i c t t thehada acina ej1983cli a ns a ndiae ha ny to bl am gai t nyone,heco talo tndsno t ur s i j tt to fralwig a a nd dc mplitt b fldi ti co e c s o f ra p itn usi in o l n n me e o an o e ie n h s ls d a e r o p on ig ka o c u e t a ss p an ifi d i s o ns lo sit litf n ong o.Th a to wa ds se wi o tp eudc , ihla e e cin s imis d t u rj ie wh c e v s h pl i iffe t fl ane c antf r e o ie w ompli t pr dedt thec a n , ovi ha ompleswih t Fe r Rul sofCi l i t he de al e vi Pr e le a ot rflng r quie e sa saesaci bl ca ms I ed,t rt s oc dtr nd he ii e r m nt nd t t tona e li . nde mde he e c r um slnce ,t t lng ofa ne c e w oul s em t be t m os a opr a e co zs f pl ntf ic ta s he i i w as d e o he t ppr i t lr e or ai i f t ptrs o l ue. Fort r a onssaed, a n ifsmotonsa ede e An a oprae o de wilis t s he e s t t pli tf i r nid. ppr i t r r l s ue hi da TheCl r i diecedt s nd c e oft sme or ndum o ni a a co pa ng or r y. e k s r t o e opi s hi m a pi on nd c m nyi de t pl n if o ai tf . E R:Ths Q dyo Ma, 0 3 NTE i a f y 2 1. . e Chi fUnied St t DititJ e e t aes src udg 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.