Gallimore v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al, No. 7:2012cv00535 - Document 15 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge James C. Turk on 12/28/2012. (tvt)

Download PDF
CL ERKSOFFI U,s. sT K Um ' GE D$ . ATROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI W ON M ATHEW LEE GALLI O RE, M DE2 23 2 1 22 J UL BY: CASE NO . 7: 2CV00535 1 . DLEY, D CLERK UW CL ERK Pe ii r ttone , M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI V. SU PER I TEND A N T NEw R I N VER V L YRE ONQ J L AL E GI AI , B :Jme C. uk y a s Tr Se orUnie St t sDit i tJudge ni t d a e sr c R e po nt s nde . M a t Le G a lm or ,a V i g ni i a e pr e ng pr s , f l d t s a ton i e l thew e li e r i a nm t oc edi o e ie hi c i n ary Nove r201 asacvi rght co ai t r42U. C.j1 algi t tt Vigi a mbe 2, i l i s mpl ntmde S. 983, le ng ha he r ni De rme to Co r ci n (VDOC' h dmic luae h str o c nfn me tc u i ghi pat n f re to s ç t ' a s ac ltd i em f o i e n , a sn m ) t bede aned pa tt e r ton ofhi s nt nc i lgh ofe ne good c o ti s he xpiai s e e e, n i t ar d onduc tme.Asr i , ti elef G a lm or s ug r l a e f om i a c r ton a m one a y c pe a i n. G i n t na tr of li e o ht e e s r nc r e a i nd t r om ns t o ve he tte Galm o e' cli a de li r s am nd mand f r las ,t cour c tu hi pladi asape ii f a or ee e he t onsr ed s e ng tton or wrto ha e sc r us p ru n t 2 U. C. 2 4, rn e hm i o mapa pe i saus i f b a op , u s a t o 8 S. j 25 ga td i nf r u rs tt , s b tttdt j is p rn e d n a tep o rrs o d n , n n tte Gal r ta hscam u si e he al u eitn a t s h r pe e p n e ta d oi d li e h t i li u i mo f monea y damag wasba r d a woul bedim is d. Se W iki on v. t on,544 U. or tr es r e nd d s se e l ns Do s S. 74,81 8 ( - 2 2005)(i ngt tç saeprs nersj 1 a toni ba e ( e pro fndi ha $ tt io ' 983 ci s n'd abs nt ir a iv l ain - n matrterle s u h ( a g so e utb erle n matr h tr e of n ai to l o te h eif o g t d ma e r q ia l eig, o t t e ag t d e tep io e ' s i (tt c nd te dngt c n ito o itr a p io p o e dn s- / h rs n rs u t sae o uc la i o o vcin r nen l rs n r c e ig l s c si t tac i woul ne s a iy de onsr t t i ldiy ofco i m e oris uc es n ha ton d ce s r l m t a e he nva i t nfne nt t dlrton' ( zai ' emphassi orgi ) ) i n i nal. I l t N ove be 201 G a lm o e no ii d t c e k' of i e t the ha be n r e e n ae m r 2, li r tf e he l r s f c ha d e el as d fo j i a dwo l s o p o iet ec u t t h sa de s Th rs nd n h sn w flda r m al n ud o n r vd h o r wih i d r s . e epo e t a o ie moton t dim isGali or spe ii n a ve ii st tonNovembe 20, i o s s lm e' tto nd rfe ha r 2012,Ga lm or wa , li e s i fc,ee s dfo j it s r ep o ain.Be a s Galmoe so l cam wa mic lu ai n n a trl ae r m al o ev r b to c u e li r ' n y li s s ac lto ofhi tr ofc i s em onfnemen a hi pr rf ha sr le wasi t nd s aye or bea eif mmedit r e s hi j225 ae ela e, s 4 peii n m us bedim is a m ootnow t hehasbe r l a e l Se La v. W ila ,455 tto t s s ed s hat en e e s d. e ne li ms U. 6 4, 31( 9 2 . S. 2 6 1 8 ) Fo t er a o sae t ec u t imis sGalmo esc us o a to wi o tp eu ie r h e s ns ttd,h o r ds s e l r ' a e f cin t u rj dc . i h An a opra eor rwile e t sda The Clr i die t d t s nd co esoft s ppr it de l ntr hi y. ek s rce o e pi hi m e or ndum opi o a a om pa ng or rt pe ii r m a hi n nd cc nyi de o ttone . E ER:ThsRJ a o Dee e,02 NT i Z y f cmbr2 1. A J Se rUnied St t Diti t udge m t aes src 1 Unde Rul 4( oft Rul Goveni j225 Cas ,hec t ys r e b) he es r ng 4 es t our ma ummmiy l d s s aj2 5 p tto tifi p anya p asfo t peiin a a yatc e e hi t ta imis 2 4 ei n ç l t lil p e r r m he t o nd n ta h d x bi h t i t t s t pettone i no e il d t r le i t dititc t' he ii r s t ntte o e if n he src our. '

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.