McLean v. Kiser et al, No. 7:2012cv00495 - Document 12 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/13/2012. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERKS OFFI U S. ST. CE DI COURT AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI N0V 13 2 1 02 J A ULi :Y: CLERK . QUENTI M CLEAN, N C .! 8 F : C i lAc i N o.7: 2c vi t on 1 v00495 Pl nt f , ai i f M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O M r.K i e etal, sr . Dee f ndant . s By: Sam ue G . is l W l on U nied St e D i t i Judge t at s s r ct Pl nifQue i M cLe aVigi ai t pr e ngpr se brngst sa to aitf ntn an, r ni nmae oce di o , i hi cin purua t 42U. C.j 1 a ns anumbe ofe o sa Re Oni Stt Prs algi s nt o S. 983 gai t r mplyee t d on ae ion, le ng voain o hsEih ha F u te t Ame d n rg t.M c va se sa ij n to od rn ilto s f i g t nd o re n h n me t ih s le n e k n n u cin r e ig t tt de e nt pr de hi w ih ne cl hi be ng,a s ha he f nda s ovi m t w ot ng, ddi nd hoes t tt de e nt sop ; ha he f nda s t i e f rng w ih hi r c ea i a s e prvieg ;a t tt g r i n c os pr m iy' t nt r e i t s e r ton nd how r i l es nd ha he ua ds l l e oxi t ' o i hi be c os l m onio e m l ey t r d. F d rlc u t h v d s s e wi p eudc , u s a tt 28U. C.j1 5 e( )B)i , e ea o rs a e imis d t rj ie p ru n o h S. 91 ()2 ( (i ) a las t e ofM c aa ' pr i prs rc anslSeci 1 5( ofTil 28prvi s t e t hre te n s evous ione omplit. ton 91 g) te o de t taprs rm a notbrng a cvi ac i wihoutpr pay e oft r r $350. flng f e ha ione y i i l ton t e m nt he equied 00 ii e i t prs rhas on 3 ormor proroc sons whiei r r t d orde aned i f he ione , e i ca i , l nca ce a e ti n a f iiy, oug a a ton ora ny aclt br ht n c i ppea i ac toft Unie St t st twa l n our he t d a e ha s di m i s d on t g o s se he r undst ti i f i ous m a i i ,orf ist s a e a c ai ha t s rvol , lc ous a l o tt l m upon w hi r le m a be gr nt d,unl st prs r i unde i m i ntdange ch e i f y a e es he i one s r m ne r o sro sp ysc lnu y f e iu h ia ij r . 'Se M cLe v. Fa s No 2:9 v 2 ( D. .u e2 1 9 )(imisdwi peu c frfi r t sae e an u t . 9 c 6 5 E. Va J n , 9 9 ds se t rj die o al e o tt h u acam)Mcaa v. li , . 9 c 3 ( D. .uy2 ,1 9 )(imis dwi peu c frfi r t sae li ; len Bol No 729 v 41 W. Va J l 6 9 9 ds se t rjdie o al e o tt ng h u acam) Mca-nv. tdSttsNo 20 c 4 7( D. . e t 1 , 0 6 (imisdwi peudc frfi et li ; -e Uni ae , . :6 v 4 E. Va S p. 2 2 0 ) ds se t rj ie o al o la e h ur saeacam) Th c u t oe t tnM cza v UntdSae, 6 F.d3 (t Ci. 0 ,heUntdSae tt li . e o r n ts ha i te n . i tts 5 6 3 91 4h r20 9)t i tts e e Cour ofAppe sf t FourhCicui satd t tM cLe n wasnotat e srke . Howeve ,a trt c t t al or he t r t t e ha a hr e-ti r r fe he our a fr e t dititc tsdim is ofM c e n' ca ef f l et saea cam , c nr ei hi t r srke. fim d he src our' s sal t a s s or aiur o tt li M Lea ec ved s hid ti Asnoe b tedse ti ta c s,dg ie ta temao i a re ta Mc a h sa latwop e iu srk s td y h isn n h t a e d qv n h th j rt ge s h t Le n a t e st rvo s tie , l y M c a n s ul heeaAe bedee e at eesrke .'Si t n, cLe hashadm uli ecam sdim is d ont s lea ho d r r m d hr -ti r' nce he M an tpl li s se hi b ss S e ea, lenv Ralf, . 1 c 2 ( . Va Ma 2 201 . Le nv. ae No 71 c 43 a i. e . ..Mcaa . tifNo 7:2 v 27 W D. . y 9, 2)Mc a Pe s, . :2 v 2 , ( . Va Se t 1 , 01 ) W D. . p. 7 2 2 . M cLe n hasneihe pad t flng f nors a t r i he ii ee, hown t the i tunde i ne da rofs rous ha s ç r mmi nt nge ei p ysc l nu y' j1 5 g .Ac o dn l,hec u t e isM c a smo int p o e d i h ia ij r . 91 ( ) c r igy t o r d n e Le n' to o r c e n ' fr o mapa pe i p ru n t 28U. C.j1 5 g , n d s se h sc mpan wih u p eu ie u rs u s a t o S. 91 ( ) a d imis s i o lit t o t rj d c . The Cl r i diec ed t s nd a c r ii d c oft sm e or ek s r t o e e tf e opy hi m andum opi on a t ni nd he a com pa ng or rt t pl i if c nyi de o he a ntf . ENTER:Nove r1 201 mbe 3, 2. ym hy' . ; z.. . ' ' r z) ,. . Z . . x' > * . -'' UN I TED STATES D I STRI J DG E CT U

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.