Blount v. Collins et al, No. 7:2012cv00476 - Document 47 (W.D. Va. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 09/09/2013. (kab)

Download PDF
CL S OFFI U. Dl COURT ERK' CE S. SX AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TE S D I STRI T C O UR T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E DI VISI N O D O N ELL J.BLO U N T,SR . , SEP 28 2 1 23 JUL . . DU ' , , r . rj' , , z ? CA SE N O .7: 12CV 00476 Pl ntf ai if, M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O V. SGT.LARRY ROSSCOLLI c & , NS, RK By:Gln E.Conr e ad C hi U ni ed Stat D i ri Judge ef t es st ct Deendants. f t) D o l J.Bl mt Sr,a Vi g ni i a e pr e di pr K ,fl t s c vi rght a ton ne l ot , . r i a nm t oc e ng o ied hi i l i s c i . purua t 42 U. C.j1 s nt o S. 983,algi t tt dee ntprs n ofki s a Re Oni Stt le ng ha he fnda io t al t d on ae Prs nusd e e sv f rea an thi Th c u t e id sl r j d me ta t d f n a t io e xc si e o c g is m. e o r d n e l mmay u g n s o ee d n s Coli ,Hae,Gibe tandYou ,a diecedt tt c ebes fraj yti att cour' lns l l r, nce nd r t ha he as et o ur ral he ts e r i tc a les onveni nc . N ow ,Bl nt m ove f a t m po a y r s r i ng or r die tng ot r Re e e ou s or e r r e t a ni de r c i he d Oni of i r w ho a e f i nds of t de e nt t s o r t i tng a ns Bl mt f brng ng on fce s r re he f nda s o t p e ala i gai t ot or i i t sl ws t Uponr viw oft r or t c r fndst tBl ' moton mus bede ed. hi a ui. e e he ec d, he ou t i ha ounts i t ni Bl ount s a es t t a t r r usng t pr de hi wih s he e r c e ton tm e a t t ha fe ef i o ovi m t c dul d e r a i i nd s w e s on t o oc as o i l t A ugus of 201 Sg .M il r a l gedl t d Bl t on A ugus ho r w c i ns n a e t 3, t le le y ol oun t 27,201 ià o ke p wr tng m e a m y of i e s up a you ha t o of m y s r s r a 3, ç r u e ii nd fc r nd ve w upe vi o s nd f i nds g ng t c tf r yotrbuls tl w s t 1 m goi t m a yo lf he lun i you l ar re oi o our o l l hi a ui. ' ng o ke ur ie l t l e n t l ve us a one. M il r a l dl t d Bl unt t t De e n s Yot ce a G ibe ta e hi o ea l ' ' le lege y ol o ha f nda t m nd l r r s f i nds La er t t s m e da whe M il r a Lt Fr nkln c m e t Bl ' ce l Bl r e . t ha n y, n le nd . a i a o ount s l, ount t d ol Fr nkln a a i bout M il ' be vi a t e t . M il r a l ge y s d, $ e' not goi t s ve ler s ha or nd hr a s le le dl ai ; s H ng o a you....151gas you and s 1 hock you w ih t bel ...untlyou s tyotr pant i w e gett t t he t i hi l sf o ake you t c t f yo ti l' Fr nkln a l ge y t d Bl m t t t w hie ta por i a her o our or ur r a . ' a i le dl ol ot ha l r ns tng not

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.