McLean v. Pease et al, No. 7:2012cv00432 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 09/17/2012. (kab)
Download PDF
CL ERKS OFFI 1 ; RI COURT CR . , ST, AT ROFk: .. k: k. .t ' '. - x p jt-1 :.: ;f) sEP 13 2 1 22 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U RT CT FO R TH E W EST ER N DI STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A R O AN O K E DIVISI N O QUENTI M CLEAN, N J A C. ULI BY; DEP . L ERK , L ERK C i lA cton N o.7: vi i 12cv00432 Pl nt f , ai i f V. M EM O M ND U M O PIN IO N M s Pea e and M s M uli , . s . lns D ef endant s. By: Sam ue G.W is l l on U nied St es D i ri Judge t at st ct Pli ifQue i M c a aVigi ai t pr e di os brngst sa ton antf ntn Le n, r ni nmae oc e ngpr e, i hi ci purua t 42U. C.j1 a i tt mair empl sa RedOni Stt Prs ( s nt o S. 983 gans wo loom oyee t on ae ion whom M ce nie tfe o ya M s Pe s a dM s M uln ) M c a se sij nci erle t so la d niis nl s . a e n . lis. Le n e k nu tv eif o tp t de e n s f om alege y i e f r ng w ih hi m ai a de i ng hi ofl or e ponde e he f nda t r l dl nt r e i t s l nd prvi m t rs c nc rg t. Ho v r fd r lc u t h ved s se wi p eu ie p ru n t 28U. C. ih s' we e , e e a o rs a imisd t rj dc , u s a t o ' h S. j 1 1 ( )2 ( (i, tla t h e o Mc a ' p e iu p io rc mpli t. S cin 1 5 g o 9 5e ( )B)i a e s t re f Le n s rv o s rs ne o an sl e to 91 ( ) f ) Til 28 pr dest ta pr s r m ay no brng a c vi a ton w ihou pr pa e oft r quie te ovi ha i one t i i l ci t t e ym nt he e r d $350. flngf 00 ii ee i t pr s r ha ,on 3 orm o e pr o o asons w hie i a ce a e or de a ne i f he i one s r i r cc i , l nc r r t d ti d n a f ciiy,br ny a lt ought a ac i or a n ton ppea i a c toft Unie St t t tw a l n our he t d a es ha s dimis d on t gr s se he oundst ti i fi ous ma ii ,orf l t sa e a ca m ha t s rvol , lc ous ais o tt li upon whih r i m a be gr ntd,unls t prs r i unde i m i ntda r c elef y a e e s he ione s r m ne nge o s ro sp y ia ijzy. f e iu h sc ln l r M c a n ha net rpad t flngf nors tea s ihe i he ii ee, hown t the i û ha s i ri i ntda rofs ro unde mm ne nge e i us p y ia ij r . j1 5 g .Ac o d n l,h c u t e isM c a smo int p o e d i h sc ln u y' 91 ( ) c r i gy te o r d n e Le n' to o r c e n ' fr o mapa pe i pzs a t o j1 5 g , n ds se hsc mp an wi u p eudc . u rs l u n t 91 () a d imis s i o lit t t rj ie r ho 1 e Mcaa v F u tNo 2:9 v 2 ( D. .t 2 1 9 )(imisdwihp eu ief rfiuet sae S e le n . a s, . 9 c 6 5 E. Va Jme , 9 9 ds se t rj dc o alr o tt acam) Mcaa v Boln , 79 v 41( . Va J l 2 ,1 9 )(imisdwihp eu iefrfi r t sae li ; le n . l a No. :9c 3 W D. . uy 6 9 9 ds se t rj dc o al e o tt i u acam) Mc a v UntdSae, 2:6c 4 7( D. . e t 1 , 0 6 (imis dwi peu iefrfiuet li ; Len . ie tts No. 0 v 4 E. Va S p. 2 2 0 ) ds se t rj dc o alr o h saeacam) Th c ut oe ta i Mc a v. tdSae , 6 F.d3 (t Ci. 0 9 ,h UntdSae tt li . e o r n ts h t n Le n Uni tts 5 6 3 91 4h r2 0 ) te i tts e e Cour ofAppe sf t Fourh Cic tsatdt tM cLe n wasnotatr -ti .Howeve ,a t cour t al or he t r ui t e ha a h ee srker r Rer he t afr t diti cou ' dimis ofM c aa sca ef f ltet saeacli ,M c n r ei hi t r srke. fimed he srct rts s sal le n' s or aitr o tt am Lea ec ved s hid ti Asn tdb tedse tnta cs ,tgie t th mao i a re ta Mc a h sa latt p e iu srk s oe y h isn i h t ae ç qv n ha te j rt ge s h t Len a t e s wo rvo s tie, l y M c ans dher Re bede Le houl ea r emed at e srke . Si et n, cte hashadm uli ecai sdim isd ont s hr e-ti r' nc he M aan ' tpl l m s se hi b ss S e eg.Mc a v Ralf, 1 c 2 7( . Va Ma 2 , 01 ) ai. e . . , Le n . tif7:2 v 2 W D. . y 9 2 2 . TheCl r i diec e t s nd ace tfe c oft sm e o a ek s r td o e rii d opy M m r ndum opi on a t ni nd he ac om pa ng or rt t pl i i f c nyi de o he a ntf . ENTER:Se e pt mber1 201 7, 2. UN I TED STA TES D I STRI J DG E CT U 2