Via v. Holloway, No. 7:2012cv00403 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 8/29/12. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFS t. DI COtRT S CE JS, ST. l AT C ANOKE, X VA Fli I ED . IN TH E U N ITED STA TES D ISTR ICT C O U R T FO R TH E W ESTER N DISTR ICT O F V I G I IA R N R O A N O K E D I ISI N V O BA RR Y LYN N V IA , Pett oner, ii V. G RE G O R Y H O LL O W A Y , Res pondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ALz 2 9 2 1 22 J A C. ' L C ULi BY; D LE C i lA cton N o.7: cvvi i 12- 00403 M E M O M N D U M O PIN I N O By: Sam ue G .W is l l on U nied St es D i ri Judge t at st ct Pe ii r Ba r Lynn V i a V igi a i a e pr e ngpr s fl t spe ii f rw rt ttone r y a, r ni nm t oce di o e, ied hi tton o i ofha sc puspurua t 28 U. C.j 225 c le ng hi 2011 c ci i t W ie bea or s nt o S. 4, halngi s onviton n he s Count Cicui Court The cour tnds t Vi has notf l exhaus ed hi st e courtr edi y r t . ti hat a uly t s at em es bef e flng t s f r ha or ii hi ede al beas pe ii a t r f e,t c tdi m i s hi pe ii wiho tton nd, he e or he our s s es s tton t ut P eu ie rj dc . 1. On s r h 31,2011,t W i e Count Cicui Cour c 4a c he s y r t t onvi t Vi of a s ul a ba t r c ed a s a t nd te y a s e d hi t 1 m ont i r e a i nd ent nce m o 2 hs nca c r ton. V i di not a al V i di ho e r fl a a d ppe . a d, w ve , ie pe ii f w rt of ha as c pus i t Supr m e Cour of V igi a. O n A ug t 2,201 t tton or i be or n he e t r ni us 2, he Supr m e Cour of V igi a gr nt d V i s ha a pe ii lm ied t t i s of t de a ofhi e t r ni a e a' be s tton i t o he s ue he ni l s r gh t a i t o ppea a gr nt d V i l a t fl a no i e of a l nd a e a e ve o ie tc ppea i t Cour of Appea s of l n he t l Vigna Th c u ts cfc ly n td ta isd cso wa wih u prj dc t Vi' rg tt r i i. e o r pe iial o e h t t e iin s t o t eu ie o a s ih o fl a s e ie ubs quen ha as pe ii l i unc e r whe he V i has ye t fl an a t be tton. t s l a t r a t o ie ppea i t Cour l n he t ofAppe s V i f l d hi f der lha aspe ii on Augus 22,2012. al . a ie s e a be tton t I I. A f r l c t c nno gr nt a ha a pe ii n unl s t pe ii r ha e us e t ede a our a t a be s tt o e s he ttone s xha t d he r edi avaiabl i t court of t s at i whi he w as convi ed. Pr s v.Rodrguez, em es l e n he s he t e n ch et ei er i 411U. 475( 973) I t peii rhasfie t e us saec t e es t fdealc t S. 1 . f he ttone ald o xha t tt our r medi ,he e r our mus dimist peii Slvon v.Smih,40 U. 53 ( 971 .l Vigi a anon- ah r t s s he tton. a t t 4 S. 1 ) n r ni, de t ow f l n uli a e y m us pr e hi c ai s t t Supr m e Cour of V i gi a a r c i a r i e o tm t l t es nt s l m o he e t r ni nd e e ve ulng fom t tc tbeor a f r dititc tma c i rhi cams Se Va.Code j8. r ha our f e edeal src our y onsde s li . e 01 654. I t s ca e t Supr m e Cou of V igi a' Augus 2,201 or rgr nt d V i l a t n hi s , he e rt r ni s t 2 de a e a e ve o a a hi crm i lc e. Theco tsaed t tçalc ppe l s i na as ur t t ha il omput tonsoftm e ...s lc ai i hal ommenc on e t da e of e r oft s or r or ...f om t da e of e r of t or r of t c r ui cour s he t nty hi de r he t nty he de he i c t to a ppoi tng c n i ouns ,w hi verda e s l be l t r' Pur ua tt t r esoft Supr m e Co tof el che t ha l a e . ' s n o he ul he e ur Vigni,an tc o a pe lmus b tldwi n 3 d ysal rte e ty offn l ud me t r i a oie f p a t e ie t 0 a fe h nr hi ia j g n. Sup.Ct R.5 : Pur ua t t co ts or r V i s ilha tm e t f l a notc of a ala . A 6. s nt o he ur ' de , a tl s i o ie ie ppe nd t r afe purue hi a ali t Supr me Cour ofVigi a. The e or Vi silha die t he e tr s s ppe n he e t r ni r f e, a tl s r c a alr m e es a ia e t hi . Furhe ,bec us t Vigi a Supr m e Cour' Aug t2, ppe e di va lbl o m t r a e he r ni e ts us 2 2 d cso wa wi o tp eu iet Vi' rg tt fl as bs q n ha e sp tto , si 01 e iin s t u rj dc o as i h o ie u e ue t b a eiin he tl h l ha sa e ha as r m e a l e t hi . Ac r ngl t c tfnds t t Vi ha notf l s tt be e dy vaiabl o m co di y, he our i ha a s uly e usedhi s t c tr medi bef eflng hi f de alha spe ii xha t s ae our e es or ii s e r bea tton. 1 11. Ba e o t e f r g ig,te c u tds se Vi' h b a pei o wih u p eu ie a s d n h o e on h o r imis s as a e s tt n t o t rj dc s i u ha t d. nex us e The Cl r i di e t d t s nd a c ri i d c ek s rce o e e tfe opy of t s M e or ndum O pi o a hi m a ni n nd a co pa ng Or rt t pe ii r c m nyi de o he ttone . EN TER : Thi 2 s d yo Au u t 2012. a f g s, 1ed St esD i r ctJudge at sti

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.