Whidby v. Aylor, No. 7:2012cv00353 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 8/8/2012. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U, DI COURT S CE S. SX AT ROANOKE, VA Fl uo t - At 2ë 2 1 l ' 22 I TH E U N I N TED STA TE S D I STR I T C O U R T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A R O A N O K E DIV ISIO N D AR R YL EV AN W H ID BY , Pett oner, ii V. AY LO R , Respondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JULA C. I D BY: DEP CL E R C i lA c i No.7: c 00353 vi t on 12- vM EM O M N DU M O PI IO N N By: Sam ue G . is l W l on U ni ed St es Di ri Judge t at st ct Pe ii rDa r Eva W hi ttone ryl n dby,a Vigi a i m ae pr ee ngpr s ,fld t s peii r ni n t oc di o e ie hi tton f m i ofhabe c pus purua t 28 U. C.j 225 chalngi hi c ci i t or t as or s nt o S. 4, le ng s onviton n he M a s Coun y Ci c tCour . The c tfnds t tW hi y ha notpr ry exha t d hi s a e di on t r ui t our i ha db s ope l use s t t c tr medis be or flng t s f r ha a pe ii a t r f e,t co tdim is hi our e e f e ii hi ede al be s tton nd, he e or he ur s s es s p tto wih u p eu ie ei n t o t rj d c . i 1. On J une 1 2012,t s adion Count Cic t Co tconvit d W hi ofhi s c 3, he 4 s y r ui ur ce dby s e ond o f e of dr vi a t be ng de a ed a ha t l of e r a s nt nc d hi t 5 ye r f ens i ng fer i cl r biua f nde nd e e e m o as i a ce a i w ih 3 ye s a 1 m ont s pe nc r r ton t ar nd 0 hs us nded. W hi s a es t the di no a ala dby t t ha d t ppe nd di notfl pe ii f r wr tofc r i a it t Supr m e Cour oft Unie St t s W hi a s d ie tton o i e tor r o he e t he t d a e . dby l o i ca es a s a e c tonlne r cor c im , ha he ha no fl d a pe ii f wrtofha as ndi t , nd t t our i e ds onfr t t s t ie tton or i be cor i any V igi a cour . pus n r ni t Il. A f der lcour cn e a t nnot gr nt a ha as pe ii unl s t pe ii r has e use t a be tton es he ttone xha t d he r medi a ia e i t c t oft sae i whih he wascon c e Pr ie v.Rod i z, e es val bl n he ours he t t n c vit d. e s r rgue 41 U. 4 ( 9 ) l t epeiine h sfie t e h u tsaec u t e de ,hefd rlc u t 1 S. 75 1 73 . f h t o r a ald o x a s tt o r r me is t e ea o r t mus dimist peii Slvt v.Smih,404 U. 53 ( 971 .l Vigni,anon- ahr w t s s he tton. a on t S. 1 ) n r i a de t o f l uli a ey m us pr e hi cai t t Supr me Cour ofVigi a a r c ve a r lng e on tm t l t es nt s l ms o he e t r ni nd e ei ui fom t tc tbeo ea f rldititc tma c i rhi cams Se Va.Code j8. r ha our fr edea src our y onsde s li . e 01 65 l t s c e,i i c e t t W hi ha y t pur ue hi ha as c a m s i t Supr m e 4. n hi as t s l ar ha dby s et o s s be l i n he e Cour ofVigi a.Ac di y,t c tfndst tW hi spe ii n i une use t r ni cor ngl he our i ha dby' tto s xha t d. 111. Ba e o t f r g ig t ec u tds se W hib sha e sp t in wih u p eudc sd n he o e on , h o r imis s d y' b a ei o t o t rj ie t ast mexhaus ed. t The Cl r i di e e t s nd a c rii d c ek s rd d o e e tte opy of t s M e or ndum Opi o a hi m a ni n nd a co pa ng O r rt t pe ii r c m nyi de o he ttone . .' .' p ?. .. . d.n . EN TER : Thi s a'.' ,. ' day ofAug t 201 us , 2. 7 ' . . 2 '+ .' . U 'e t t D i ti tJ a es s r c udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.