Whidby v. Aylor, No. 7:2012cv00353 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2012)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 8/8/2012. (tvt)
Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U, DI COURT S CE S. SX AT ROANOKE, VA Fl uo t - At 2ë 2 1 l ' 22 I TH E U N I N TED STA TE S D I STR I T C O U R T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A R O A N O K E DIV ISIO N D AR R YL EV AN W H ID BY , Pett oner, ii V. AY LO R , Respondent . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JULA C. I D BY: DEP CL E R C i lA c i No.7: c 00353 vi t on 12- vM EM O M N DU M O PI IO N N By: Sam ue G . is l W l on U ni ed St es Di ri Judge t at st ct Pe ii rDa r Eva W hi ttone ryl n dby,a Vigi a i m ae pr ee ngpr s ,fld t s peii r ni n t oc di o e ie hi tton f m i ofhabe c pus purua t 28 U. C.j 225 chalngi hi c ci i t or t as or s nt o S. 4, le ng s onviton n he M a s Coun y Ci c tCour . The c tfnds t tW hi y ha notpr ry exha t d hi s a e di on t r ui t our i ha db s ope l use s t t c tr medis be or flng t s f r ha a pe ii a t r f e,t co tdim is hi our e e f e ii hi ede al be s tton nd, he e or he ur s s es s p tto wih u p eu ie ei n t o t rj d c . i 1. On J une 1 2012,t s adion Count Cic t Co tconvit d W hi ofhi s c 3, he 4 s y r ui ur ce dby s e ond o f e of dr vi a t be ng de a ed a ha t l of e r a s nt nc d hi t 5 ye r f ens i ng fer i cl r biua f nde nd e e e m o as i a ce a i w ih 3 ye s a 1 m ont s pe nc r r ton t ar nd 0 hs us nded. W hi s a es t the di no a ala dby t t ha d t ppe nd di notfl pe ii f r wr tofc r i a it t Supr m e Cour oft Unie St t s W hi a s d ie tton o i e tor r o he e t he t d a e . dby l o i ca es a s a e c tonlne r cor c im , ha he ha no fl d a pe ii f wrtofha as ndi t , nd t t our i e ds onfr t t s t ie tton or i be cor i any V igi a cour . pus n r ni t Il. A f der lcour cn e a t nnot gr nt a ha as pe ii unl s t pe ii r has e use t a be tton es he ttone xha t d he r medi a ia e i t c t oft sae i whih he wascon c e Pr ie v.Rod i z, e es val bl n he ours he t t n c vit d. e s r rgue 41 U. 4 ( 9 ) l t epeiine h sfie t e h u tsaec u t e de ,hefd rlc u t 1 S. 75 1 73 . f h t o r a ald o x a s tt o r r me is t e ea o r t mus dimist peii Slvt v.Smih,404 U. 53 ( 971 .l Vigni,anon- ahr w t s s he tton. a on t S. 1 ) n r i a de t o f l uli a ey m us pr e hi cai t t Supr me Cour ofVigi a a r c ve a r lng e on tm t l t es nt s l ms o he e t r ni nd e ei ui fom t tc tbeo ea f rldititc tma c i rhi cams Se Va.Code j8. r ha our fr edea src our y onsde s li . e 01 65 l t s c e,i i c e t t W hi ha y t pur ue hi ha as c a m s i t Supr m e 4. n hi as t s l ar ha dby s et o s s be l i n he e Cour ofVigi a.Ac di y,t c tfndst tW hi spe ii n i une use t r ni cor ngl he our i ha dby' tto s xha t d. 111. Ba e o t f r g ig t ec u tds se W hib sha e sp t in wih u p eudc sd n he o e on , h o r imis s d y' b a ei o t o t rj ie t ast mexhaus ed. t The Cl r i di e e t s nd a c rii d c ek s rd d o e e tte opy of t s M e or ndum Opi o a hi m a ni n nd a co pa ng O r rt t pe ii r c m nyi de o he ttone . .' .' p ?. .. . d.n . EN TER : Thi s a'.' ,. ' day ofAug t 201 us , 2. 7 ' . . 2 '+ .' . U 'e t t D i ti tJ a es s r c udge